Category Archives: headline

Powerful Japan earthquake sets off landslide, injures dozens

Residents in northeastern Japan today are cleaning up clutter in stores and homes after a strong earthquake set off a landslide on a highway, stopped trains and caused power blackouts for thousands of people.

The 7.3 magnitude temblor late on Saturday shook the quake-prone areas of Fukushima and Miyagi prefectures that 10 years ago had been hit by a powerful earthquake that triggered a tsunami and a meltdown at a nuclear power plant.

Tokyo Electric Power Co., the utility that runs the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant that was hit by the March 2011 disaster, said the water used to cool spent fuel rods near the reactors had spilled because of the shaking.

READ MORE: Newly-found Fukushima plant contamination may delay cleanup

But there were no radiation leaks or other irregularities, TEPCO said.

About 100 people were injured, according to public broadcaster NHK TV, mostly spraining their ankles while falling on stairs and getting cut by broken glass.

There were no reports of major injuries.

The quake did not cause a tsunami, and power had been restored by early Sunday, although some bullet train services were still halted.

TV footage and video shared on social media showed boxes, books and other items scattered on floors.

Experts warned of possible aftershocks.

Yasutoshi Nishimura, the minister in charge of economic and fiscal policy, expressed sympathy for those who had suffered damage and injuries.

“The government will continue to do our utmost to respond,” he said.

Some homes reported problems with water supply.

The Japan Meteorological Agency said the quake was centered about 55 kilometers beneath the ocean.

First batch of COVID-19 vaccine arrives in St. Kitts and Nevis

Prime Minister, Dr. the Honourable Timothy Harris.

BASSETERRE, St. Kitts — The Federation of St. Kitts and Nevis has secured its first batch of Novel Coronavirus vaccines.

Prime Minister Dr. the Honourable Timothy Harris, in a national address on Saturday, February 13, confirmed that the Federation received 2,000 doses of vaccine this week, courtesy of the Government of the Commonwealth of Dominica.
Continue reading First batch of COVID-19 vaccine arrives in St. Kitts and Nevis

NSW hits major COVID-19 milestone

New South Wales has hit a major milestone in its fight to contain COVID-19, recording 28 days of no new locally acquired cases.

It is the first time New South Wales has reached the 28-day milestone since the start of the pandemic last March.

A previous 26-day streak last November ended on December 2 when a hotel quarantine worker tested positive.

READ MORE: Two new COVID-19 cases in Victoria as new exposure sites revealed

https://twitter.com/NSWHealth/status/1360741721026424837?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

The result comes after 16,302 people were tested across NSW yesterday.

Two new cases were detected in the state's hotel quarantine program.

The 28-day milestone is significant as it marks two infection cycles of the virus – the length of time medical experts consider is needed before the virus can be said to be eliminated from the community.

NSW Health's Dr Stephen Conaty described the results as "pleasing" but warned "this does not mean we can drop our guard".

"Cases are present in other states and are regularly being detected among international travellers arriving from overseas," he said.

The state now faces a fresh threat to remaining COVID-free, with its border to Victoria remaining open.

https://twitter.com/NSWHealth/status/1360741809777827842?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Thousands of travellers who flew into Sydney are being tested for coronavirus after potentially being exposed to an infectious cafe worker at Terminal Four of Melbourne Airport.

The person worked at Brunetti Cafe on February 9 between 4.45am and 2pm, Victoria's Department of Health says.

Two new local cases were recorded in Victoria today and a fresh list of potential exposure sites were released.

Trump labels impeachment trial 'a witch hunt' after acquittal

The US Senate has acquitted former president Donald Trump in his second impeachment trial, voting that Mr Trump was not guilty of inciting the deadly January 6 riot at the US Capitol.

However, the verdict amounted to a bipartisan rebuke of the former President with seven Republicans voting he was guilty.

The final vote was 57 guilty to 43 not guilty, short of the 67 guilty votes needed to convict.

EARLIER: Democrats mull calling witnesses, extending impeachment trial

In a statement following the vote, Mr Trump said members who supported him "stood proudly for the Constitution".

He called the proceedings "another phase in the greatest witch hunt in the history of our country" and portrayed himself as the victim, stating that "no president has ever gone through anything like it" and touted the fact that more than 74 million people voted for him in November.

But the Republican senators who voted against Mr Trump amounted to a number higher than even Mr Trump's legal team had expected, marking a stark departure from the first impeachment trial where only one Republican, Mitt Romney of Utah, found Mr Trump guilty.

This time, Republicans Senators Richard Burr of North Carolina, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowksi of Alaska, Romney, Ben Sasse of Nebraska and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania voted to convict Mr Trump today.

Perhaps the biggest surprise was Sen. Burr, the former Senate Intelligence Committee chairman who led the Senate's Russia investigation, after he voted earlier in the week that the trial was unconstitutional.

Both Sen. Burr and Sen. Toomey are retiring from the Senate at the end of 2022 and will not face voters again.

Sen. Burr said that while he believed the trial was unconstitutional, he decided to put that aside after the Senate voted on Tuesday that the trial was constitutional and should proceed.

"As I said on January 6, the president bears responsibility for these tragic events. The evidence is compelling that President Trump is guilty of inciting an insurrection against a coequal branch of government and that the charge rises to the level of high Crimes and Misdemeanours. Therefore, I have voted to convict," Sen. Burr said in a statement.

But enough of Sen. Burr's colleagues sided with the constitutionality argument in their votes to acquit.

Donald Trump is accused of instigating a violent insurrection against Congress.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell offered a blistering criticism of Mr Trump's actions surrounding the January 6 riots on the Senate floor after the vote, but Sen. McConnell said he voted to acquit because he did not believe convicting an ex-president was constitutional.

"The Senate's decision today does not condone anything that happened on or before that terrible day," Sen. McConnell said.

"It simply shows that senators did what the former President failed to do. We put our constitutional duty first."

Vote comes after surprise call for witnesses

The final vote came quickly Saturday on the fifth day of the Senate trial after a surprise Democratic request for witnesses earlier Saturday threw the trial briefly into chaos.

The Senate voted 55 to 45 to consider witnesses – with five Republican joining Democrats – after the managers said they wanted to hear from Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, a Washington Republican who had told CNN new details about House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy's phone call with Mr Trump.

But after several hours of intense negotiations between Senate leaders, the managers and Mr Trump's legal team, the managers agreed to enter Rep. Herrera Beutler's statement into the trial record as evidence and move forward without hearing from witnesses.

Democratic senators had expected House managers to move past witnesses onto closing arguments and a final vote.

But the lead impeachment manager, Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, announced when the trial got underway that the managers wanted to subpoena Rep. Herrera Beutler about her knowledge of McCarthy's phone call, following a CNN report on Friday.

Rep. Herrera Beutler, one of the 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Mr Trump last month, confirmed in a statement Friday that Mr McCarthy said the president told him on the call, "'Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are.'"

The trial recessed after the witness vote and Senate leaders tried to hash out the next steps.

Calling witnesses could have opened up the trial to a lengthy new phase, as Mr Trump's team vowed to call hundreds of witnesses in response, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Republican senators demanded that each side receive an equal number of votes.

Closing the House managers argument, Rep. Raskin played to senators' sense of history in urging them to convict the former President for inciting the rioters to attack the Capitol on January 6 and failing to stop them after the violence had unfolded.

"This is almost certainly how you will be remembered by history," Rep. Raskin said.

"That might not be fair. It really might not be fair. But none of us can escape the demands of history and destiny right now. Our reputations and our legacy will be inextricably intertwined with what we do here, and with how you exercise your oath to do impartial justice."

Mr Trump's lawyer Michael van der Veen argued that Mr Trump did not incite a riot that had been preplanned, again repeating the falsehood that the rioters represented both left and right fringe groups, when video evidence and court documents conclusively show that the riot was perpetrated by Trump supporters.

Concerns that calling witnesses would have backfired

After the last-minute decision calling for witnesses, House Democrats ultimately decided to cut a deal because of the unpredictability of how that would turn out and fears that doing so could backfire and undermine their case, according to multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions.

Democrats didn't make a decision to call Rep. Herrera Beutler to testify until shortly before the proceedings began Saturday morning, sources said.

The managers debated until nearly 3am on Saturday (local time) about whether to call witnesses following news of the McCarthy call.

According to a Democrat familiar with the matter, House Democratic impeachment managers did not tell top Senate Democrats they wanted witnesses until five minutes before the proceedings.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer didn't even know until that point, but he told the managers Friday night and Saturday morning that Senate Democrats would support whatever decision the mangers made – and reiterated that point on a caucus call Saturday.

"After the vote, it was clear the managers had no plan," the Democrat said.

"Senate Democrats gave them the votes, but the managers didn't know what their next step was."

They ultimately settled on submitting her statement to the record as long as Mr Trump's attorney made a public statement agreeing to submit it as evidence.

The reason: they believed that pushing forward with her testimony would add little beyond her statement and could potentially cost them GOP support, while dragging out the proceedings further.

GOP Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mitt Romney of Utah and Ben Sasse of Nebraska voted in favor of witnesses.

Before the vote was finalised, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said he was changing his vote to yes – the idea being to support Mr Trump's lawyers also calling witnesses in addition to the managers' request.

The sources told CNN that Democrats were uncertain how Rep. Herrera Beutler's testimony would come across after she was subject to cross examination, with some concerns that she could potentially undercut their case if there were holes in her account.

Moreover, if they called other witnesses, it could also backfire.

For instance, Mr McCarthy could provide testimony that defended Mr Trump, undermining what they believe is a rock-solid case that Mr Trump incited the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol, the sources said.

Plus witnesses would not ultimately change GOP senators' minds, they concluded, while hearing from witnesses could bog down the Senate for weeks and imperil President Joe Biden's agenda.

With Senators Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Angus King of Maine, who are two centrist members of the Senate Democratic Caucus, telling CNN there needed to be an equal number of witnesses on both sides, that meant that the trial could be delayed for an indefinite period, perhaps weeks.

The concern was that the Trump team could try to call witnesses like Ms Pelosi and put them in an awkward position.

And with a weeks-long delay, it could threaten Democrats' ability to advance Biden's agenda since they need consent from Republicans to schedule votes on nominees and other matters.

With no consent, the Senate could be in a state of gridlock because Sen. Schumer would be forced to take procedural steps to overcome an objection, a process that takes days for each objection.

Democrats had been debating whether to call witnesses leading into Saturday's session in light of new details that have emerged with the trial underway this week.

In addition to the McCarthy call, Alabama GOP Sen. Tommy Tuberville confirmed that, in a call he had with Mr Trump as the riot unfolded, he told Mr Trump that Vice President Mike Pence was being evacuated.

Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, whose phone Mr Trump had called when he spoke to Sen. Tuberville, submitted phone records showing the call at 2.26pm came two minutes after Mr Trump had tweeted an attack on Mr Pence.

Rep. David Cicilline of Rhode Island, one of the impeachment managers, argued that the call showed Mr Trump was more concerned about delaying the certification of the November election than Mr Pence's safety.

Mr Trump took no actions after learning Pence had been evacuated, Rep. Cicilline said.

GOP senators focus on constitutional argument

While there was plenty of drama over witnesses at the trial Saturday, the reality for Democrats was that additional evidence was unlikely to have changed the final outcome of the trial.

The final vote was already telegraphed earlier in the week, when the Senate voted 56-44 that the impeachment trial was constitutional.

The GOP senators who voted the trial of a former president was unconstitutional said that was what would determine their final vote, leaving the Senate well short of the two-thirds – or 17 GOP senators who would have to join all 50 Democrats – needed for conviction.

Senator McConnell told his colleagues this morning he would vote to acquit Mr Trump, according to a source familiar with the conversations.

Senator McConnell plans to explain his decision after the final vote.

The House managers had argued throughout the trial that Mr Trump should be convicted and barred from holding future office because he was responsible for the rioters who attacked the US Capitol on January 6 and endangered the lives of lawmakers and Mr Pence.

They've made the case that Mr Trump incited the rioters through months of false claims that the election was being stolen from him, then failed to take any action to stop the violence or condemn the rioters afterward.

The defence team offered its rebuttal on Friday in a brief presentation, in which they sought to equate Mr Trump's rhetoric with that of Democrats, arguing that political rhetoric is protected by the First Amendment and Mr Trump's language did not incite a riot that was pre-planned.

READ MORE: Capitol rioters intended to 'capture and assassinate' elected officials

Trump Aquitted, But McConnell Blames Him for Riot, Could Face Criminal Charges

Senate Republicans handed former President Trump his second impeachment acquittal on Saturday, clearing him of charges that he incited the mob that attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Senators voted 57-43 on whether to convict Trump of high crimes and misdemeanors for “willfully inciting violence against the Government of the United States.”

Every Democrat voted to find him “guilty,” the question technically before the Senate, and they were joined by seven GOP senators — falling short of the necessary 67 votes, or two-thirds majority, needed for conviction.

The vote comes roughly five weeks after the attack on Jan. 6, when a pro-Trump mob stormed the Capitol in an effort to stop the counting of President Biden‘s Electoral College win. The Democratic-led House moved to impeach Trump exactly one week later, with 10 Republicans supporting the effort.

The aftermath of the attack is still visible around the Capitol, where a fenced perimeter surrounds Capitol Hill and National Guard troops remain stationed around the complex.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Saturday unleashed blistering criticism of former President Trump, blaming him for sparking the attack on the Capitol while also explaining why he didn’t vote for a conviction.

McConnell also suggested that Trump could face criminal prosecution for his actions.

“There’s no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day. No question about it. The people that stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president,” McConnell said.

“And having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories and reckless hyperbole, which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on the Earth,” McConnell added.

McConnell’s remarks came after the Senate fell short of the 67 votes needed to convict Trump. Though McConnell voted to acquit him, arguing it fell outside the Senate’s jurisdiction, his remarks are a stinging rebuke of Trump’s actions and rhetoric.

McConnell said the mob breached the Capitol because it was fed “wild falsehoods” by Trump, who was “angry he had lost an election.”

McConnell, like most Senate Republicans, refused to acknowledge for weeks that President Biden had won the election. But he publicly congratulated Biden on the floor in mid-December after the Electoral College certified the victory.

McConnell marked the day as when Trump “opened up a new chapter of wilder and more unfounded claims.”

“The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise,” the GOP leader said, adding that Trump “seemed determined to either overturn the voters decision or else torch our institutions on the way out.”

Trump’s legal team defended his actions on Jan. 6, when he repeated false claims that the election was “stolen” and encouraged his supporters to march on the Capitol just as former Vice President Mike Pence and lawmakers were counting the Electoral College votes.

Trump’s team also argued that the former president did not realize that Pence was in danger.

McConnell rejected those claims, noting that attack played out on live television.

“We know that he was watching the same live television as the rest of us. A mob was assaulting the Capitol in his name. … The president did not act swiftly. He did not do his job. He didn’t take steps so federal law he could be faithfully executed and order restored,” McConnell said.

But the GOP leader also said that impeaching Trump falls outside the Senate’s jurisdiction because Trump is no longer in office. McConnell voted twice previously to try to declare the trial unconstitutional, an argument that has been rejected by a swath of legal scholars.

Though the House impeached Trump while he was still in office, the Senate trial didn’t start until after Biden was sworn in. Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) tried to get McConnell to bring the Senate back into session early to start the trial before Trump left office, but the GOP leader shot down the request.

“The question is moot because former President Trump is constitutionally not eligible,” McConnell said.

McConnell, however, hinted that Trump could still face legal repercussions.

“President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office, as an ordinary citizen, unless the statute of limitations has run. … Didn’t get away with anything yet,” McConnell said.

The post Trump Aquitted, But McConnell Blames Him for Riot, Could Face Criminal Charges appeared first on The St Kitts Nevis Observer.