An early US and Israeli war goal was to install a former president of Iran famous for hating them.

Australia is frittering away $1 billion every year by building unnecessary carparks that homeowners and renters don't actually want or need, according to a new report.

Local and state law mandates off-street parking for newly-built apartments and townhouses in most Australian capital cities – and it comes at an eye-watering cost.

Researchers from the Grattan Institute have called for an urgent law change to abolish these minimum-parking requirements, which could save $5.2 billion in construction costs by 2031.

NATIONAL: Australian watchdog takes action against viral AI 'nudify' site

READ MORE: One dead, four wounded in shooting at Sydney home

The report, aptly titled "Wasted Space", claims developers could afford to build around 9000 extra homes over five years with this saving.

Meeting the current standards is forcing homebuyers to pay tens of thousands more in an already severe housing crisis.

It can blow out the construction budget for a new two-bedroom apartment by an average of $70,000 in Sydney, by $137,000 in Perth, $113,000 in Brisbane, $62,000 in Melbourne and $95,000 in Adelaide, according to the report.

For three-bedroom units, this cost exceeds $100,000 in most capital cities.

Grattan researchers found that a large chunk of people living in apartments don't need parking.

CRIME: Phone boast got Australia's youngest murderer re-arrested

Around 40 per cent of those living in studio or one-bedroom apartments don't own a car, while 19 per cent of households in two-bedroom apartments don't have a vehicle.

In Sydney and Melbourne, there are more car spaces in apartment buildings than cars.

As much as 40 per cent of these spaces sit vacant each night, the report found.

The experts at Grattan say reducing or scrapping the legal requirements would lower the price of new homes and drive down rent.

They suggested that developers "unbundle" car spaces so that renters or buyers can opt out of using them.

The report also recommended that state and local governments better manage on-street parking, including more permit schemes, time limits and user charging in high-demand areas.

READ MORE: Urgent vaccine warning amid 'biggest outbreak in decades' of rare disease

Some councils have already abolished minimum car-parking requirements.

Brisbane City Council relaxed the rules for inner-city developments in March 2025 and several Sydney councils, such as the City of Sydney, City of Parramatta and the Inner West, have introduced maximum parking requirements.

And last year, the Victorian government axed minimum requirements for areas that are a short walk from public transport.

If every council and state government does the same, the report notes, Australian cities will have "livelier streets, more productive economies, and a higher quality of life".

NEVER MISS A STORY: Get your breaking news and exclusive stories first by following us across all platforms.

• Download the 9NEWS App here via Apple and Google Play
• Make 9News your preferred source on Google by ticking this box here
• Sign up to our breaking newsletter here

Forty Australian business owners under 40 have penned an open letter to the prime minister, saying his tax reform is an "aspiration ambush".

The self-described "young business builders of Australia" from technology, artificial intelligence, retail and manufacturing sectors told Anthony Albanese that his budget has hit them the hardest.

"We work the hours. We carry the risk," the letter read. 

READ MORE: Business owners hail '47 per cent partner' PM in meme trend

"We do it because we believe in the business we are building, and because we have been told, repeatedly, that this spirit of having a crack is exactly what the country needs.

"Unfortunately, the budget your government just announced tells us a very different story."

The budget has decreased the generous capital gains tax (CGT) discount to 30 per cent, adjusted to a cost base indexation, grandfathered negative gearing and discretionary trusts as a way to support younger people to enter the housing market.

But business owners have been swept up in the changes, which the founders claim will affect every growing business in Australia.

Most of the signatories said they supported the CGT changes on the sale of residential investment properties but drew a line at shares.

"The changes to the CGT discount on shares will do nothing to make houses more affordable; all they will achieve is to suck the ambition, drive and hope out of the hearts of young business builders nationwide," the letter reads.

"Surely that can't be the plan?"

READ MORE: Is rentvesting dead? Tax reform to push people away from popular strategy

The letter was signed by 40 business owners, including those from workout supplement company Pillar Performance, link-in-bio tool Linktree and AI-led menu and ordering platform me&u.

"Prime Minister, we respectfully look forward to your reply," they concluded in the letter. 

Albanese is being mocked by small business owners around the country who have taken to social media to post AI-generated photos depicting the prime minister as their new business partner, claiming he will be taking 47 per cent of their earnings when they sell their company.

The budget's tax reform has not yet passed parliament. The Coalition have vowed to fight them but the Greens are undecided.

Albanese and senior members of his cabinet are currently on a nationwide campaign to spruik the budget and explain the changes. 

READ MORE: KFC workers urged join class action for slice of $28.8 million payout

They have reiterated that there is a one-year grace period before the CGT changes come into effect, consultation with the start-up sector and support for businesses who want to restructure their discretionary trust to a fixed trust.

Businesses with existing concessions will not be affected by the changes.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers told reporters yesterday he chose to include shares in the CGT changes so he does not "introduce new distortions into the system".

"Those distortions which were introduced by Howard and Costello made a negative impact on housing in particular, and we don't want to replace one set of distortions with another set of distortions," he said.

"This is about a fairer, more neutral treatment of capital gains."

NEVER MISS A STORY: Get your breaking news and exclusive stories first by following us across all platforms.

• Download the 9NEWS App here via Apple and Google Play
• Make 9News your preferred source on Google by ticking this box here
• Sign up to our breaking newsletter here