‘The republic will be crushed’

Henry assumed the premiership with international backing a few weeks after Moise’s death, after a brief standoff with the previous Prime Minister. In the absence of a president, he will now lead Haiti until its long-overdue elections — which have been postponed again, until sometime next year.

The Prime Minister has often described solving the murder case as a personal mission. “Nothing. Absolutely nothing. No political maneuver, no media campaign, no distraction can deter me from this goal to bring justice for President Moise,” Henry told world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly last week.

According to Henry’s office, both Vincent and Claude were fired for breaking the law, which forbids prosecuting top officials without permission from the head of state — currently Henry himself.

Migration will continue as long as inequality persists, says Haiti’s prime minister as Del Rio bridge crisis ends

But Vincent says he was sacked for refusing to fire Claude, which he describes as an ethically impossible demand given the ongoing investigation. “I told [Henry], ‘This is not possible.e are going to have problems. The republic will be crushed if you dismiss the public prosecutor,” Vincent said.

In the end, Haiti’s Interior Minister Liszt Quitel stepped in to fire Claude.

Quitel, an engineer by training, was also given Vincent’s job — and is now doing double-duty as head of both Haiti’s interior and justice ministries.

Speaking to CNN this weekend, Quitel dismissed the phone calls in question as insufficient for a warrant against the Prime Minister, and noted that the investigation under Vincent’s leadership had led to no clear answers.

“I don’t see what would be the motive to ask the Prime Minister to appear before a judge, just because he had a phone call,” he said.

“This is obviously something that’s politically motivated,” he said — a claim Vincent rejects.

A troubled investigation

The probe into Moise’s death has long been troubled by allegations of obstruction and missing pieces.

In July, sources close to the case told CNN they were troubled by the fact that Justice Ministry staffers had not been given immediate access to crime scenes and key evidence, including surveillance footage from inside and around the president’s mansion during the attack.

Clerks involved in the case also received death threats, forcing some to flee the capital.

At the time, Vincent did not respond to requests for comment. Now, however, he defends his oversight of the months-long probe, insisting investigators were free to work as they needed.

He says he too receives death threats from the armed groups that control large parts of Port-au-Prince.

The assassination probe is currently with an independent investigating judge, who has not publicly called for the Prime Minister’s testimony.

Additional foreign support will also be needed to close the case, according to Henry and Vincent — a rare point of agreement.

The US and Colombia did send investigative teams to assist in the early days of the investigation. But with fingers now pointing in all directions, potential foreign partners in Haiti’s intrigue-plagued investigation may feel wary of getting involved.

Correction: An earlier version of this story misspelled the first name of Justice Minister Rockfeller Vincent.

Reporting contributed by CNN’s Matt Rivers in Mexico City and Melissa Bell in Paris.

The post Fired Justice Minister Calls for Haiti PM To Quit Over Moise Murder Probe appeared first on The St Kitts Nevis Observer.

Taiwan is preparing for potential war with China following a series of increasingly aggressive military activity from Beijing, with Taipei’s foreign minister warning that should the nation attack, it would “suffer tremendously.”

China on Monday sent 52 military aircraft into Taiwan’s airspace, the largest military provocation seen yet.

In anticipation of further aggression, the self-ruled island is preparing to repel any strike and has asked Australia to increase intelligence sharing and security cooperation, Taiwanese Foreign Minister Joseph Wu told the Australian Broadcast Corporation’s “China Tonight.”

“The defense of Taiwan is in our own hands, and we are absolutely committed to that,” Wu told ABC’s Stan Grant in an interview to be broadcast Monday.

“I’m sure that if China is going to launch an attack against Taiwan, I think they are going to suffer tremendously as well.”

China, which claims that Taiwan is part of its territory, in the past week has stepped up its saber rattling against the island to press it to back down and accept Chinese rule. Taipei, meanwhile, maintains it is a sovereign country separate from Beijing.

China’s latest show of force follows a similar move on Friday, when it sent 38 military aircraft into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone — at the time the largest number of aircraft it had sent in a single day — and 30 warplanes on Saturday.

In response, the State Department said Sunday that the U.S. is “very concerned” about China’s “provocative military activity near Taiwan” and urged Beijing “to cease its military, diplomatic, and economic pressure and coercion” against the island.

=========================================

Biden Warns China  Over Provocations

The Biden administration is warning China over its increasing provocations against Taiwan, a critical flashpoint amid the ongoing poor relations between Washington and Beijing.

Taiwan raised the alarm after Chinese warplanes violated its airspace nearly 150 times over the course of nearly four days, leaving top Taiwanese — and some American — officials worried about a military confrontation.

A warning from the White House: “We urge Beijing to cease its military diplomatic and economic pressure and coercion against Taiwan and we have an abiding interest in peace and stability across the Taiwan strait. That’s why we will continue to assist Taiwan in maintaining a sufficient self-defense capability,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters Monday.

What’s the relationship?: The U.S. has a unique relationship with the tiny island territory, providing military and other types of support since Taiwan severed ties with Beijing in 1949 at the end of China’s civil war. But the U.S. has held back from creating official ties with the territory as part of agreements with Beijing.

Taiwan considers itself the legitimate government of the Chinese people while Beijing criticizes it as a rogue territory. Taipei and Beijing have gone through periods of rapprochement, but the Chinese Communist Party has increasingly threatened reunification through military intervention.

Beijing also takes exception with Washington’s support of Taipei, accusing the U.S. of meddling in internal Chinese affairs.

Worsening relations: The Biden administration says it is not seeking conflict with Beijing, but relations with China nevertheless seem to be growing more tense on a number of fronts.

U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai said Monday that she will begin direct talks with her Chinese counterpart to press Beijing about its failure to comply with aspects of the Trump-era “phase one” trade pact.

And the administration has sought to shore up its alliances to better direct resources toward countering Chinese influence in the Asia-Pacific region, last month announcing a new pact between the U.S., United Kingdom and Australia to cooperate on security, which in part involves helping Australia acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

Lawmakers weigh in: There is strong, bipartisan support in Congress for close relations between the U.S. and Taiwan.

The island nation is viewed as a democratic bulwark against the ambitions of the Chinese Communist Party, and a key U.S.-trading partner for essential commodities like semiconductors and electronics.

“China’s intimidation tactics will only redouble our commitment to stand up for our democratic friend, Taiwan,” Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, tweeted on Monday.

Likewise, Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho), ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, denounced China’s provocations in the region and called for supporting “the people of Taiwan,” in a tweet on Monday.

China’s response: “Taiwan belongs to China and the U.S. is in no position to make irresponsible remarks,” Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying said in a statement on Monday, reacting to warnings issued by the Biden administration.

The post Taiwan in War Preparations, US Warns China appeared first on The St Kitts Nevis Observer.

NIA CHARLESTOWN NEVIS — Clerk of the Nevis Island Assembly Ms. Myra Williams issued an amendment to the Order Paper which was circulated on October 01, 2021, ahead of the assembly sitting at Hamilton House in Chambers on Tuesday October 05, 2021.

According to the revised Order Paper, under the Public Business segment of the proceedings, Hon. Spencer Brand, Minister of Physical Planning and Environment will move the first, second and third readings of the Nevis Physical Planning and Development Control (Amendment) Bill, 2021.

The Bill when passed will amend the Nevis Physical Planning and Development Control Ordinance, Chapter 6.09 (N) and for matters related thereto or connected therewith.

Under the same segment, Minister Brand will also seek leave to withdraw the Nevis Building Contractors Registration Bill, 2021 which had its first reading at the July 13, 2021 sitting.

The Physical Planning Minister will also move the first, second and third readings of the Nevis Contractors Registration and Regulation Bill 2021.                          

Hon. Mark Brantley, Minister of Finance will move the second and third readings of the Nevis International Insurance (Amendment) Bill, 2021. That Bill had its first reading during the July 13^th sitting of the Assembly.

Under the Introduction of Bills and First Readings, Mr. Brantley, will seek leave to introduce and have read a first time the Nevis International Banking Bill, 2021, while Minister Brand will seek leave to introduce and have read a first time the Nevis Contractors Registration and Regulation Bill, 2021.

The post Nevis Island Assembly Revises Order Paper for October 05 Sitting appeared first on The St Kitts Nevis Observer.

SAO PAULO, Oct 4 (Reuters) – Brazilian healthcare company Hapvida Participacoes (HAPV3.SA) said in a securities filing late on Sunday it has prescribed hydroxychloroquine to COVID patients.

Hapvida admitted prescribing hydroxychloroquine in the early days of thehealth crisis when it still believed it could benefit patients. But it said those prescriptions never corresponded to the “majority” of drugs it prescribed.

The company added it is no longer prescribing the drug.

Local media have reported doctors in the northeastern state of Ceara alleging the company forced the prescription of ineffective drugs for COVID patients such as hydroxychloroquine.

A Brazilian congressional investigation has been probing Prevent Senior, a privately owned health insurance company, for allegedly prescribing ineffective drugs and delaying ICU admissions during the pandemic.

Hapvida said it has opened 1,000 ICU beds, hired 6,000 health professionals and expanded its hospital network during the pandemic.

(This story corrects spelling of hydroxychloroquine)

The post Brazilians Given Wrong Medication, Pfizer Effective 6 Months, US Long Covid Patients Need Help appeared first on The St Kitts Nevis Observer.

The star prize at last year’s Conservative party fundraising ball was a game of tennis with Boris Johnson. The party’s co-chair Ben Elliot was enlisted to play too. But when bidding started there was little drama. Well-heeled guests already knew who was going to outbid everyone: a tall, outgoing blond woman from Moscow who – as one person put it – “dominates the room”. “She always gets top prize. She wins every auction,” the guest said, wryly.

The victorious bidder was Lubov Chernukhin, one of the biggest female donors in recent British political history. Since 2012, she has given the Tories £2.1m. This extraordinary sum has paid for two tennis matches with the prime minister, including in 2014 when Johnson was mayor of London, as well as dinner with his predecessor Theresa May.

Chernukhin, a former banker married to the former Russian oligarch Vladimir Chernukhin, reportedly donates enough to the Tories to qualify for membership of a small group of ultra-rich donors who meet monthly with Johnson and his chancellor, Rishi Sunak. What this exclusive club discusses is not made public. “She’s deep in the party,” the Tory ball guest said.

Yet nothing really is publicly known of Chernukhin’s views. That she is rich is self-evident. Her huge donations suggest a desire to nudge Downing Street and the country’s politics in her preferred direction. She is simultaneously a public figure – named as a donor in electoral commission updates, the subject of BBC and Daily Mail reporting – and an enigma. The couple appear to prefer to keep it that way. As Vladimir Chernukhin acknowledged, giving evidence in a 2018 legal case against a fellow tycoon, it has been “modus operandi” to disguise his commercial interests. He spoke of using “fronts”, “camouflage”, and “silent participation” in specific commercial deals, adding: “I want to be invisible.”

Russian connections

The Pandora papers shed a revealing light on the Chernukhins. Leaked files reveal their extraordinary reliance on the hidden offshore world, and thereby offer a clue as to their interests. The couple go to remarkable lengths to keep their wealth and financial arrangements secret, the leak suggests, instructing lawyers over a tax authority dispute that spanned France, Switzerland and the British Virgin Islands (BVI)

The papers also suggest Lubov Chernukhin’s money flows, at least in part, from her husband’s multifarious corporate structures. That raises the question over the extent to which it is Vladimir, not Lubov, who may be the ultimate source of some of the cash flowing into the Conservative party. Other documents raise questions about a source of Vladimir Chernukhin’s wealth: a lucrative Moscow property deal he secretly struck when he was a senior public official in Russia.

In 2015, Johnson boldly stated that checks by the party had assured him Vladimir Chernukhin was not a Vladimir Putin “crony”. All checks had been carried out, he said. The leak nonetheless suggests that Chernukhin may have in recent years remained on good terms with Kremlin-connected figures in Moscow: among them the wife of a government minister, with whom he owned a factory. At least until recently, Vladimir Chernukhin appears to have retained assets in Russia, some of them dating back to when he was a deputy finance minister under Putin and a powerful state banker.

As part of a joint investigation with BBC Panorama, the Guardian put a detailed list of issues and questions to the Chernukhins about disclosures in the Pandora papers and issues covered in this article. Their lawyers did not respond in detail to most of the questions, but stressed that their failure to address each allegation put to them should not be construed as an admission of their accuracy. They said the invitation to comment had raised “a number of serious, false and defamatory allegations” about their clients.

The Chernukhins’ lawyers did not respond directly to the suggestion their clients appear to have taken elaborate steps to move their money around various offshore structures, in what may amount to lawful but morally questionable tax avoidance. Vladimir Chernukhin does not pay regular UK tax. Instead, he is a “non-dom”, the leak suggests, with Russian and British citizenships. Being non-domiciled in the UK can bestow certain tax advantages, such as not paying UK tax on foreign income. Lubov Chernukhin refuses to disclose her tax status. She acquired a British passport in 2011, which – as the Tory party is keen to point out – makes her donations legal.

Private jets and superyachts

The Chernukhins use a sprawling network of shell companies to maintain their opulent lifestyle, the Pandora papers suggest. Even by oligarchic standards, the details are remarkable. Several times a year the couple have “chartered” their own superyacht to sail around the south of France and the Caribbean. They have also rented their own private jet registered in the Isle of Man. In both cases money to pay the bills is provided from UK entities to offshore companies. Between 2011 and 2014 yacht hire alone cost them £11m.

It is a similar story with the Chernukhins’ £30m London townhouse, overlooking Regent’s Park. They spent nearly £100,000 installing CCTV cameras and a vault with a bombproof metal door. The security guard gets his wages from an offshore company. So do the butler and housekeeper. Even the firm that maintains the swimming pool using an underwater robot sends its invoices to a low-key family office in Singapore, from where they are forwarded to the BVI.

The pair own a £10m country house in Oxfordshire, bought in 2006, two years after Vladimir relocated to the UK. Its quad bikes, beehives and chicken house are offshore-owned. In response to disruption during renovation works, an angry letter was sent to the contractor. It complained of blocked paths, and “inappropriate language” by workers. The author? An anonymous shell company, General Development Group Ltd, based in the BVI.

While there is nothing to suggest illegality, the couple’s reliance on offshore companies for even the most routine transactions is striking.

It is another Chernukhin property, however, that came to the attention of tax authorities, the leak reveals. In 2016, the French tax authorities sought information about Vladimir and Lubov’s offshore wealth – something the couple fiercely resisted. It centred on a turreted villa, once the home of English aristocrats, on Cap d’Antibes, a retreat popular with billionaires. Above the door is a Latin motto: small but convenient. The house belongs to a paper Portuguese entity. French tax officials wanted to know: who actually owns it?

The French wrote to the BVI’s tax authority, the ITA. It in turn demanded information from the Panamanian law firm Alcogal, which managed the Chernukhins’ island companies. Alcogal carried out its own research into the couple’s offshore empire. It found 32 BVI companies linked to the Chernukhins, 28 of them owned by Vladimir.

The ITA’s request for information caused alarm inside Alcogal, as it suggested to them potential concern over their clients’ tax arrangements. Internal emails at the offshore provider show them pondering how best to respond. One possible solution was to “stop providing” the Chernukhins’ companies with agent services, a supervisor suggested. It is not known what came of the French tax inquiries. However, documents in the Pandora papers do suggest the Chernukhins reacted aggressively when they discovered their offshore provider was in touch with French tax officials.

Their Swiss adviser demanded to know what information Alcogal had shared with international authorities. When Alcogal refused to say, the Chernukhins sued it – ultimately losing the case in early 2020. The east Caribbean supreme court ruled the Chernukhins were not entitled to see documents disclosed by Alcogal to tax authorities. Lawyers for Alcogal said the case demonstrated that it was a “responsible service provider which acts in accordance with applicable laws and cooperates fully with regulators”.

Separately, the Chernukhins took legal action against the tax authority in Switzerland, demanding it reveal its communications with France’s tax authority, which had requested information about who sat behind an opaque Swiss company. Multiple Swiss courts have dismissed that case. The Chernukhins’ lawyers did not comment on the status of the French tax inquiries or their failed lawsuit against Alcogal. However, they said their clients “have at all times been advised by reputable tax advisers and have complied with all applicable laws”.

Other files in the leak appear to shed light on the apparent source of at least some of Lubov Chernukhin’s wealth. In Companies House filings she has in the past described herself as a banking consultant and “investment director”. She came to the UK around 2003. A few years later she met Vladimir Chernukhin, after he left his native Russia having apparently fallen out with Putin. By 2014, one of her husband’s companies had loaned her UK company as much as £9.4m, the documents suggest. They appear to show the loans were written off as “bad debt”, a process the couple seemingly used at other times after they lent cash between their firms.

There is no suggestion these intracompany loan structures were unlawful. However, they do appear to show substantial funds were transferred to Lubov Chernukhin from her husband’s offshore empire. One key document in the files appears to confirm she is at least partly reliant on her husband’s funds. It is an email exchange from 2017, after the BVI introduced new financial transparency legislation. Under the new rules service providers were obliged to pass the names of company beneficial owners to the authorities.

The provider described Vladimir as an “investor in high-profile properties in the UK and abroad”, adding that Lubov, who was referred to as a “housewife”, was “financially supported by her husband”. The Chernukhins’ lawyers said it was not accepted that any of Lubov Chernukhin’s political donations had been funded by improper means or affected by the influence of anyone else.

Humble beginnings

Like other wealthy Russians, Vladimir Chernukhin started from nothing. “All of us came from the Soviet Union with zero money in the pocket,” he said in 2018. The “all” referred to future oligarchs who began as budding entrepreneurs back in the early 1990s, as the communist system fell apart. After a stint in the army Chernukhin went into finance. He founded his own company and joined the ministry of foreign trade.

At some point he must have attracted the attention of Putin, a KGB operative turned St Petersburg politician. In September 1999, a month after becoming Russia’s prime minister, Putin made Chernukhin deputy chairman of Vnesheconombank (VEB). This was a plum role in a state bank. Chernukhin oversaw huge loans, to industry and to the regions.

His financial dealings in Russia came under scrutiny in 2018 when he testified in a high court legal battle brought against him by the oligarch Oleg Deripaska. The dispute centred on the ownership of a Moscow textiles factory, which the two men acquired in 2002 as a lucrative property development. Ultimately, Chernukhin won the case when a judge ruled in 2019 that he was Deripaska’s true joint-venture partner in the project. Deripaska was ordered to pay $95m (£70m) to resolve the dispute.

Speaking on oath during the trial, Chernukhin made rare and previously unreported comments about his time as a senior Russian state official. He said there were few rules preventing state or state-connected employees from doing private business of their own. But it was better to be discreet about it, he said. Rather than holding the investment in his own name, Chernukhin said he used a previous girlfriend as a proxy. “She was my front,” he said of the woman, who was not Lubov.

Under cross-examination Chernukhin accepted that when he and Deripaska acquired the Moscow development, one of the things he could “bring to the party” was his relationship with Moscow’s then mayor, Yuri Luzhkov.

According to Chernukhin’s testimony, when the project encountered planning difficulties, he and Luzhkov negotiated an agreement. As part of the arrangement – and in return for Luzhkov agreeing to smooth over the planning issues – Chernukhin suggested to the court he agreed to use his influence as chair of VEB bank, a cabinet-level position, to help an acquaintance of Luzhkov on another business matter. There is no suggestion Luzhkov’s acquaintance was aware of the arrangements between the two men.

Chernukhin’s testimony raises questions about whether he used his influence as a senior public official for his own private gain. After reviewing the oligarch’s evidence about the deal with Luzhkov, at the request of the Guardian, Tim Owen QC said that while the “you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours” agreement apparently described by Chernukhin in court was not proof of corruption, it “raises an obvious red flag” for a political party accepting donations that could be derived from Chernukhin’s wealth.

In their response to the Guardian, the Chernukhins’ lawyers said Vladimir had not accumulated any of his wealth in a corrupt manner. They added that none of the high court proceedings, nor the findings made in the case, which Chernukhin won, supported any suggestion of corruption by their client.

Among the Tory elite

Other Pandora files suggest that in 2004, when he exited Russia, Vladimir Chernukhin was allowed to leave the country with the assets he had acquired during his government and VEB years – equating to about $500m (£366m). These were bundled into offshore firms. This very Russian story would have ended there were it not for the fact that Lubov Chernukhin, after she had become a British citizen, started donating large sums to David Cameron’s Conservatives. Behind the scenes, and over non-public drinks and dinners, the couple were quietly building up a network of high-level British establishment contacts.

The files suggest the Chernukhins retain senior Russian connections. In 2017, Vladimir Chernukhin sold the St Petersburg factory plot he bought in the 1990s to a major Russian construction company. Purchase price: £20m. His business partner in this deal was the wife of Yevgeny Yelin, a former deputy governor of St Petersburg who served as Putin’s acting minister for economic development until 2017.

In July, the Financial Times suggested Lubov Chernukhin was a member of the Tory party’s advisory board, the elite donor group that meets monthly with Johnson and Sunak. Conservative officials say it was set up before Johnson took power, but will not say when. Its existence was a closely guarded secret. Several of those who are reportedly part of this group have given £250,000 or more in 2020 and 2021, including Lubov Chernukhin.

The Conservative party said Lubov Chernukhin was a British citizen “which gives her the democratic and legal right to donate to a political party”, and added that donors did not influence government policy. One former donor disagrees. “It’s about access and political influence. When you sit next to an MP or minister or secretary of state you have one-on-one time. You can tell them your agenda. You can question them or make requests. They have to give their time.” The donor was unimpressed with Lubov Chernukhin’s gifts to the party. “People suck up to her because of her money,” they said.

This accusation may be unfair. But if nothing else, the leak suggests the Chernukhins are likely to be opposed to greater offshore transparency. The government is committed to introducing legislation that would reveal the true owners of offshore companies that buy property in the UK. If it is passed, the Chernukhins will be forced to declare their ownership of multiple homes – worth at least £40m. So far, Johnson has not followed through on a 2018 draft law.

The post Pandora Papers: UK’s Wealthiest & Secretive Offshore Family? appeared first on The St Kitts Nevis Observer.

Well known attorney and former President of St. Kitts and Nevis Football Association Anthony Johnson passed last evening after a brief illness according to reports.

Johnson who was an active lawyer and the immediate past President of the SKNFA vacating the role in late August after not seeking a fourth term.

Tributes to Johnson started pouring in Monday morning from football clubs and executives as well as other organisations.

The Rams Village Superstars football club were amongst those who paid tribute to Johnson on social media.

They described his passing as a “sad – painful day in the footballing fraternity.”

“As we heard the shocking news of the most recent former SKNFA President, Mr Anthony Johnson’s demise, our hearts broke and lost for speech.

“We are eternally grateful for your unwavering service and love to football and the wider community here in St. Kitts & Nevis.”

The Rivers of Living Waters Christian Centre Football Club also published a tribute to Johnson noted they are ‘shocked and deeply saddened” by the sudden death of immediate past President of SKNFA Mr Anthony Johnson.

“Our Club’s Executive and Players wishes to extend our most sincere and heartfelt condolences to his family.”

The SKNFA in a statement extended my sincerest condolences to his family
and friends.

“Mr. Johnson served as President from 2009 to 2021 and was instrumental in the
growth of the game of football in St. Kitts and Nevis. We’ll pray for peace and comfort during this time of mourning. May his soul rest in eternal peace.”

The post Attorney and Former SKNFA President Anthony Johnson passes appeared first on The St Kitts Nevis Observer.

The post Covid Antiviral Pill Halves Hospitalisations, Deaths, Maker says appeared first on The St Kitts Nevis Observer.

 NIA CHARLESTOWN NEVIS — A sitting of the Nevis Island Assembly is scheduled for October 05, 2021, from 10 a.m. at the Assembly Chambers at Hamilton House on Samuel Hunkins Drive in Charlestown.

According to the Order Paper dated October 01, 2021, circulated by Ms. Myra Williams, Clerk of the Assembly, Hon. Mark Brantley, Minister of Finance will seek leave to introduce and have read a first time the Nevis International Banking Bill 2021.  Hon. Spencer Brand, Minister of Physical Planning will also seek leave to introduce and have read a first time the Nevis Contractors Registration and Regulation Bill 2021.

During the Public Business segment of the sitting, the Minister of Finance will seek to have read a second and third time the Nevis International Insurance (Amendment) Bill, 2021. The Bill had its first reading at the July 13, 2021, sitting of the Assembly.

Minister Brand will also seek leave to withdraw the Nevis Building Contractors Registration and Regulation Bill, 2021. The Bill had its first reading at the July 13, 2021 Assembly sitting. This Bill will however, be replaced with the Nevis Contractors Registration and Regulation Bill, 2021.

The post Nevis Island Assembly Meets October 5 appeared first on The St Kitts Nevis Observer.

“As we strive to provide them with a path to status, we will not work in conflict by spending resources seeking to remove those who do not pose a threat and, in fact, make our nation stronger,” he added.

Mayorkas said enforcement priorities for apprehension and removal remain focused on noncitizens who are a threat to US national security, public safety and border security.

But he said the guidelines are a break from a “categorical approach to enforcement.

“They require an assessment of the individual and the totality of the facts, and circumstances to ensure resources are focused most effectively on those who pose a threat,” said the US Homeland Security Secretary.   

“There is also recognition that the majority of the more than 11 million undocumented or otherwise removable noncitizens in the United States have been contributing members of our communities across the country for years,” he added.

He said the immigration enforcement guidelines require the protection of civil rights and civil liberties, stating that a noncitizen’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation or gender identity, national origin, political associations, or exercise of First Amendment rights cannot be factors in deciding to take enforcement action.

He said continuous training, a process to review their effective implementation, extensive data collection and a case review process will all be required.

Mayorkas said the new guidelines replace the interim priorities issued by ICE Acting Director Tae Johnson in February and become effective November 29, 2021.

On Wednesday, the Homeland Security Secretary met with Haitian Ambassador to the United States Bocchit Edmond to discuss the nations’ continued cooperation.

“I appreciated the opportunity to speak directly with Ambassador Edmond about our shared commitment to ensuring that Haitian migrants are treated with dignity and respect,” Mayorkas said.  “I look forward to continuing to work with the government of Haiti and other partners throughout the hemisphere as we work toward safe, orderly and humane management of migration in the region.”

Mayorkas thanked the Government of Haiti for supporting the safe return and re-integration of Haitian nationals.

Mayorkas said he assured the Haitian ambassador that “the dignified and humane treatment of all individuals, regardless of their immigration status, is his top priority.”

The Secretary also said he shared that the investigation into mistreatment of Haitian migrants in Del Rio, Texas, is ongoing.

The post US with New Immigration Enforcement Priorities Amid Haitian Crisis appeared first on The St Kitts Nevis Observer.

The post Nine Players on Cuba’s U23 Baseball Team Defect in Mexico appeared first on The St Kitts Nevis Observer.