An "amorous couple in a stairwell" has been blamed for sparking a major flood in Melbourne's city loop last week

Two stations packed with commuters were evacuated after the Olivia Rodrigo concert on Thursday, causing significant delays for weary concertgoers.

CCTV from the incident later revealed the incident was caused by a couple in a stairwell who may have accidentally triggered the sprinkler mechanism.

READ MORE: German airline whacked for violating 128 Jewish passengers' rights

"It would appear that an amorous couple in a stairwell dislodged a sprinkler," Minister for Transport Infrastructure of Victoria Danny Pearson told reporters on Wednesday.

"There was extensive flooding. Metro will be investigating these matters further and police are investigating.

"Perhaps a stairwell may not be an appropriate place to find yourself in after dinner."

It was initially believed the flooding at Melbourne Central and Flagstaff stations was caused by an act of vandalism.

READ MORE: Why only 538 people out of 330 million get to decide the US election

Police released CCTV and images of two people they believed could assist with their investigation.

It's alleged the duo gained access to a stairwell about 10.40pm and damaged a water pipe and sprinkler. 

Victoria Police said the offenders had fled the scene after the extensive flooding.

"The delays affected big crowds trying to get home from the Olivia Rodrigo concert at Rod Laver Arena," police said at the time.

Investigations into the incident continue.

The deer then had its throat cut in a ‘gratuitous and violent act’ that was posted online.

New talent, big ideas, and deep pockets are heralding an exciting new era in Kiwi sport.

An Australian homeowner's alarm has been raised after their neighbour installed a security camera that points over the dividing fence and directly into their backyard.

The homeowner posted the situation to Reddit, claiming the Ring Spotlight camera turned on when they walked around their alfresco.

Ring describes that particular model as its "most advanced battery-powered spotlight camera" which has motion sensors and captures both audio and video.

READ MORE: Pedestrian killed after being hit by car near tourist hotspot

It also has a bird-eye view which can "see precisely where someone's been and how they got there with an aerial view of your home".

The homeowner asked: "Am I justified in asking them to disable the spotlight and adjust the camera's angle?"

While many Reddit users suggested the homeowner try to obscure the camera's view, let's see what the federal government says.

The Privacy Act does not cover security cameras operated by individuals acting in a private capacity, according to the office of the Australian Information Commissioner.

While some state and territory laws may apply, the office advises coming to an agreement with your neighbour yourself.

"If your neighbour has a security camera pointed at your house and you're worried about your privacy, first try to talk to your neighbour," the Australian Information Commissioner's office said.

READ MORE: Harvey Norman opens giant store in England

"If this doesn't fix the problem, you could ask your local community justice or neighbourhood mediation centre for help."

In the instance that mediation has failed, you can then contact your local council to find out if the practice contravenes any local laws.

"Some councils require planning permission for security cameras," the Australian Information Commissioner's office said.

"If your property is part of a strata title, check the by-laws to see if they cover installing or using security cameras."

For more information on whether any laws apply in your state and territory, contact your local Attorney-General's Department.

Dog trials at the Show started well yesterday despite a bit of sheep unpredictability.

OPINION: The Government risks undermining public confidence in the justice system.

The 45-year-old accused is facing charges of failing to stop and dangerous driving.

Anthony Albanese is copping heat from both parties over his $4.3 million coastal property purchase.

After the PM acquired the cliff-top home in Copacabana on NSW's Central Coast he acknowledged his "good income" and privilege as a well-paid politician.

While some Labor MPs have defended Albanese's right to buy property, members of the coalition are furious and several anonymous federal MPs have reportedly raised eyebrows.

READ MORE: German airline whacked for violating 128 Jewish passengers' rights

Deputy opposition leader Sussan Ley took the opportunity to blast the PM over the huge purchase.

Ley described the PM as "out of touch with ordinary Australians who are really struggling and really worried in the lead up to Christmas" to Sky News.

Opposition leader Peter Dutton wished Albanese and his fiancé Jodie Hayden well on Tuesday and said the couple were "obviously planning for the next stage of life post-politics".

READ MORE: Popular Sydney beach shut down by mysterious debris

Nationals leader David Littleproud also defended Albanese and implied he was setting himself up for retirement.

"The prime minister has made smart decisions, and he shouldn't be brought down for that," Littleproud said.

Labor insiders are said to be privately baffled by his decision to acquire a $4.3 million waterfront home in the current economic climate.

"Several Labor insiders have spoken out. They're angered by the PM's decision, especially in the lead up to an election that's going to be fought on the issue of cost of living," Ben Fordham, who broke the news yesterday, said on-air today.

"The feeling inside Labor is that the PM has completely misread the room… ALP insiders are conceding this is his Hawaii moment, you know, there's trouble in paradise."

Ley responded to claims the ALP was not so chuffed with the news.

"I'm not surprised that the Prime Minister's Labor colleagues are starting to suggest that he's out of touch, out of touch with ordinary Australians," she added.

Labor frontbencher Chris Bowen admitted the PM didn't consult with his party over the purchase. 

"Of course he didn't and nor should he have. Every Australian is entitled to buy and sell property," he told ABC Radio.

"He cops it when he provides a rent holiday to his tenants. He cops it when he buys a property. I think most average Australians say fair enough. You know, this is what aspiration is about."

Amanda Rishworth, minister for social services, said Albanese was unfairly copping it over something plenty of politicians have done.

"It's entirely a matter for the prime minister and his fiancé," she said.

"He wouldn't be the first politician, or indeed person, in Australia to buy and sell property."

After news of his purchase broke, Albanese defended his lavish property portfolio and said he knew what it was like to struggle.

"My mum lived in the one public housing [home] that she was born in for all of her 65 years," he said.

‘My heart goes out to those people and families.’

Johnny Sexton uses his book to get plenty of gripes related to NZ off his chest.