Tag Archives: oceania

Matilda's create $7.6 billion economic boost across country

The Matilda's have generated a $7.6 billion economic boost for retail and travel industries across Australia, with expectations a win tonight could further increase figures.

The FIFA Women's World Cup side is facing France in the quarter finals in Brisbane at 5pm after drawing a 75,000 strong crowd in Sydney.

Airwallex global accountants tracked sales and revenue for the retail and travel sectors after tickets went on sale for the World Cup to monitor spending.

READ MORE: Australia's friendly win 'out the window'

Australian fans celebrate as the Matildas beat Denmark

It found $4.53 billion of the $7.6 billion was from travellers and foreign exchange.

Airwalles general manager for Australia and New Zealand Luke Latham said dollars, pounds, yen, euros, pesos and dinar are pouring into Australia's travel and retail sectors thanks to the World Cup.

"The Women's World Cup teams are drawing record crowds and they're also drawing record spending in our hotels and retail stores," Latham said.

READ MORE: Maui death toll rises again as resident describes being 'caught off guard'

Matildas players pose for a team photograph ahead of their international friendly match with France.

"In the current environment, this has been a screamer of a goal for the Australian economy."

He said he hoped a Matilda's win tonight would "keep working its magic on our economy".

A state-by-state breakdown is below.

  • New South Wales: $2.98 billion- hosting 11 matches
  • Victoria: $2.30 billion- hosted 6 matches
  • Queensland: $1.55 billion- hosting 8 matches
  • Western Australia: $663.2 million- hosted 5 matches
  • South Australia: $160.9million- hosted 4 matches

FIFA has previously said one fifth of ticket holders were from overseas.

Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox.

Your rights as an Airbnb renter in Australia, explained

Airbnb has revolutionised the short-stay industry.

Launched in 2008, it now eclipses the world's biggest hotel chains.

In Australia alone there are about 100,000 listed properties.

READ MORE: Petrol prices hit 13-month high as drivers urged to shop around

But in dealing with both a digital platform and a private owner (or "host", in Airbnb-speak), your legal rights as a renter (or "guest") can be unclear – at least without reading lengthy terms and conditions.

This article answers six very common questions about using Airbnb in Australia.

Please note that your legal rights may differ in other countries.

Even if Airbnb's terms and conditions are near identical – and they generally are – there may be differences in consumer laws.

What if an Airbnb property doesn't match its description?

Airbnb's terms and conditions require the host to provide "complete and accurate information" about their property.

Content, including photos, must be "up-to-date and accurate at all times".

Airbnb's Host Ground Rules state that listings "should accurately describe the home and reflect the features and amenities that will be available".

If a property does not match its description or photos, report this to Airbnb.

False advertising will also likely breach the Australian Consumer Law, which prohibits (Section 18) commercial conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive.

Report to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission here.

Airbnb listings must provide "complete and accurate information" about the property.

There are no specific provisions to claim a refund or a discount for misleading listings.

Your only recourse would seem to be to initiate the cancellation policy that applies to your booking.

READ MORE: Virgin Galactic launches first space tourists flight

So when can I get a refund?

If you cancel your booking or leave the property early, your refund rights are determined by your cancellation policy (see "show trip details").

There are various policies (from which a host selects when listing).

Most allow full refunds if you cancel one to five days prior to check-in, while others require up to 30 days' notice or only provide partial refunds.

If the host cancels on you, they may be penalised by Airbnb.

READ MORE: What's behind the war being waged on social media against a cashless society

Can an Airbnb host impose harsh and unreasonable 'house rules'?

If an owner wants to make rules against visitors without their permission or how many times you can use the washing machine, they generally can.

When you rent a property through Airbnb, you are entering into a private agreement with the owner.

Under contract law, they can stipulate whatever terms they like, so long as those rules aren't illegal.

A Reddit user posted this list of "additional rules" they say they say was stuck on the door of their Airbnb accommodation.

READ MORE: Experts' solutions to 'completely unacceptable' rental crisis

Airbnb guest shares note of additional rules left by host

What Australian Consumer Law does prohibit are unfair terms in standard form "consumer contracts" – which an Airbnb contract likely qualifies as.

An unfair term is one that:

• causes a significant imbalance in your rights and obligations
• is not reasonably necessary to protect the host's interests
• would cause you detriment (financial or otherwise) if it was enforced.

The problem is that you will need to sue the host (that is, initiate civil litigation) to prove this.

Your best option is to carefully review the rules before you confirm your reservation.

Once you confirm, you are legally agreeing to all of the host's terms whether you've read and understood them or not.

If you disagree with a rule, ask the host to waive or amend it.

If they won't budge, your choice is to book or not.

What are the boundaries for an Airbnb host/owner?

Hosts are required to ensure every property is secure and safe.

Airbnb's Community Policy states properties must be properly lockable and free of hazards, and hosts must be responsive and willing to answer guest queries within a reasonable time.

According to Airbnb, a host cannot physically intrude or interfere with your stay.

They can only re-enter their property (or a guest's room in a shared stay) if there is an emergency or with express permission.

In a shared stay, the host must not enter the bathrooms or guest bedrooms when the guests are inside.

The host is also forbidden from sharing private details, photos, or videos of you without consent.

Where your safety is threatened, you should contact law enforcement and notify Airbnb.

If you decide to leave, you may be entitled to a partial refund.

Your rights depend on the cancellation policy applying to your booking (discussed further below).

An Airbnb host is forbidden from sharing private details, photos or videos of you without consent.

READ MORE: How strong is Australia's passport, and how long does it take to get one?

Airbnb is under fire from the Australian consumer watchdog for misleading thousands of Australian users over a three year period.

If I am injured in or get sick because of an Airbnb property, can I claim compensation?

Clause 4.2 of Airbnb's terms and conditions states that, by staying at a listed property, you acknowledge and "freely and willfully" accept the risk of "illness, bodily injury, disability, or death".

Further, clause 19 contains a broad disclaimer absolving Airbnb of any liability for "personal or bodily injury or emotional distress" incurred in using its services.

Clause 20 also contains an indemnity preventing you from making any claim against Airbnb in relation to your stay.

This gives Airbnb legal protection.

But you may make a claim against the host.

The first step would be to formally write to the host outlining your claim.

Airbnb may also assist with any disputes.

If this fails, you can sue the host but whether the cost and effort are worth it will depend on the extent of your injury or illness.

If you do make any claim against the host, they will likely rely on Airbnb's insurance.

Every Airbnb host is insured up to about $1.5 million through Airbnb's Host Liability Insurance Programme.

This covers any bodily injuries incurred by guests (or others) and damage to or theft of any property belonging to a guest (or others).

Staying at a listed Airbnb property means "freely and willfully" accepting the risk of "illness, bodily injury, disability, or death".

There are some exceptions to what Airbnb's insurance will cover, such as intentional violence, mould and communicable disease.

If you want compensation for something the host is personally liable for, you are more likely to have to take legal action, using a lawyer.

Consider the costs carefully.

READ MORE: Research claims relief is in sight for renters. Not everyone's so sure

16 April 2018, Germany, Berlin: Airbnb's logo can be seen on different screens in Airbnb Germany GmbH's office in the Neue Schoenhauser Street. Airbnb is a community marketplace for people to book and rent accommodations Private and commercial lessors rent apartments with the support of agencies. Photo: Jens Kalaene/dpa-Zentralbild/dpa (Photo by Jens Kalaene/picture alliance via Getty Images)

What's the maximum cleaning/damages fee an Airbnb host can charge?

Cleaning fees are set by the host. Airbnb provides a pricing tool to help them calculate a reasonable fee – generally based on size and facilities – but there is no maximum, presumably on the rationale that market forces (and reviews) will deter hosts from charging too much.

Nor is there a maximum damages fee. You can formally dispute the amount with Airbnb, which will determine if it is reasonable, relying on information provided by both parties.

Charging exorbitant prices is not illegal though Australian Consumer Law does prohibit "unconscionable conduct".

But, again, you need to initiate legal proceedings and have a court agree you deserve compensation.

Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox.

Where to go for help and advice

You can contact Airbnb for any account, listing, or reservation-related questions.

Online forums can also be useful for advice and support.

You can report consumer complaints to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission but the federal regulator does not resolve individual complaints or provide legal advice on your rights and obligations.

For preliminary advice go to the following state and territory consumer advice agencies:

ACT Access Canberra
New South Wales NSW Fair Trading
Northern Territory Northern Territory Consumer Affairs
Queensland Office of Fair Trading
South Australia Consumer and Business Services
Tasmania Consumer, Building and Occupational Services
Victoria Consumer Affairs Victoria
Western Australia Commerce WA

This article written by Mark Giancaspro, Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Adelaide, is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence. Read the original article.

Why aerial shooting is back on the table to control Kosciuszko brumby numbers

When NSW Environment Minister Penny Sharpe announced earlier this week that aerial shooting was back on the table as a possible brumby control option, passions rose to the surface, as they always do on this issue.

"NSW Labor has revisited… gunship slaughter," brumby advocate Alan Lanyon told Today in his trademark emotive language.

"For far too long, the most humane and effective control method has not been available for feral horses in Kosciuszko National Park," Invasive Species Council Indigenous ambassador Richard Swain countered in more measured tones.

Australian brumbies (Getty)

READ MORE: Wild horses blamed for ecological disaster in national parks

Why people love brumbies

Brumbies have roamed the high country of NSW and Victoria for up to 200 years.

They were celebrated in the poetry of Banjo Paterson and in The Silver Brumby stories penned by the late Elyne Mitchell.

Because of their celebration in literature, and because a wild horse thundering across the snow grass tussocks is a hell of a sight, many Australians see brumbies as the heart and soul of the mountains.

Show them the grandest vista from the highest summit, and it'll pale in comparison to the swish of a brumby's tail as it hides among the snow gums.

Why brumbies pose an environmental problem

Unfortunately, brumbies cause terrible damage to the alpine landscape.

The presence of huge herds of 300kg horses with hard hooves is devastating to fragile alpine plants which evolved for thousands of years alongside only small, soft-footed animals like wallabies.

Across the mountains, brumbies are turning crystal clear mountain streams to stinking, stagnant mudheaps.

They are trampling and destroying the spongey sphagnum moss that is home to the endangered corroboree frog.

They are grazing fields of snow grass to bare earth, exposing native ground-dwelling mammals that rely on grass for cover from predators.

And they are increasingly a menace to motorists.

Take a look at these two images.

The first shows the state of a creek in brumby country in northern Kosciuszko National Park.

The second shows a pristine creek in a nearby valley where brumbies generally don't go.

Ecologists liken the damage to coral bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef.

Their numbers just keep growing…

Kosciuszko National Park head ranger Dave Darlington first became concerned at rising brumby numbers back in the late 1990s.

He says there were "only" about 1000 brumbies then, but even that number was considered a problem.

Today, the estimate is as high as 23,000.

Brumby advocates dispute that number, and while they have no evidence to back up their claims, in a sense the actual number of horses is irrelevant.

What's apparent to everyone in and around Kosciuszko National Park is that there are far, far more brumbies than ever before.

Sadly, rehoming brumbies on a mass scale is not feasible, as there are simply not tens of thousands of people out there who are capable of taking a horse.

Even ground shooting has become relatively ineffective as a control method with so many brumbies in the park, as authorities just can't get the job done quickly enough.

It's also worth remembering that the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Management Plan specifies that there should be around 3000 brumbies.

That's the plan put in place to protect the brumbies by former NSW deputy premier John Barilaro – the first piece of legislation in Australian history prioritising non-native animals in a national park.

Wild Brumbies seen in the park from a NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service helicopter.

That's why aerial shooting is being put on the table again

Aerial shooting of horses has effectively been banned in NSW since the year 2000, after one horse was found alive and severely wounded a full week after a cull of 600 brumbies in Guy Fawkes River National Park in northern NSW.

Amid a public outcry, the then-state environment minister Bob Debus put a moratorium on the practice.

The snow grass plains of northern Kosciuszko are less tricky terrain than the gorge country of Guy Fawkes, which is why Kosciuszko National Park rangers believe the likelihood of a similar mishap is extremely remote.

Aside from the need to protect Australia's unique alpine environment from hard hooves, a large brumby cull this summer may prevent an animal welfare tragedy in the coming years.

The land won't be able to sustain a herd this size when the summer rain stops falling after three wet La Niña years.

In the severe drought of the late 2010s, thousands of brumbies perished from starvation in Kosciuszko National Park, many on the banks of the iconic Snowy River in extremely distressing scenes.

As cruel as any aerial shoot might appear, it wouldn't be that ugly.

Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox.

Climbers deny walking over dying porter on K2

An avalanche of hate is being directed the way of climbers who are accused of ignoring a dying man while trying to summit the world's second-highest mountain K2, the forbidding 8611 metre peak in Pakistan's Karakoram Range.

Confronting footage captures the controversial moments that climbers step around dying porter Mohammed Hassan on their way to the top of the mountain renowned for being the world's deadliest on July 27.

Norwegian mountaineer Kristin Harila is at the centre of the controversy. On reaching K2's summit, the 37-year-old set the speed record for climbing the world's highest 14 peaks (the planet's only summits above 8000 metres), achieving the feat in just 92 days.

READ MORE: Sherpa who saved climber in Everest death zone says it was his hardest rescue

But at what cost? Harila and other climbers have been accused of putting personal glory ahead of humanity.

Austrian mountaineer Philip Flämig shot the footage and claims that Hassan was still moving three hours after his serious fall and remained alive.

"This man was still alive while around 50 people climbed past him," Flämig told Austrian newspaper Der Standard.

Harila faced the full fury of the public, with a blizzard of hateful comments on her Instagram account claiming she walked on by and did nothing.

The Norwegian took to both Instagram and her personal website to defend her actions vigorously.

READ MORE: Ten-time Everest climber dies after scaling peak in Nepal

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cvws-XDtpE7/?img_index=1

"I feel angry at how many people have been blaming others for this tragic accident. This was no one's fault, you cannot comment when you do not understand the situation, and sending death threats is never okay," she wrote.

In her lengthy post, she went on to explain that several members of her team, herself included, tried to assist the fallen porter for 90 minutes before an avalanche distress call forced her to leave Hassan with her cameraman to go higher up.

Hassan was reportedly an inexperienced operator in high alpine environments, having previously only worked at base camp. However he took on the role with a rope-fixing team at high elevations to earn money to pay for his mother's medical treatment.

Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox.

At-home DNA test led to discovery of identity of body found in wall

An at-home DNA test led police to identify suspected homicide victim Tanya Lee Glover months after her body was found, 9News can reveal.

Donna Truscott and Tanya Lee Glover had never met, but a sample of Truscott's DNA helped police investigators identify the human remains of Glover, who had been missing for more than a decade before her body was discovered behind a wall at a Brisbane unit complex last December.

Truscott took an at-home DNA test after becoming curious about her family's ancestry, ticking a small but important box when submitting her sample.

READ MORE: Hawaiian island declared a disaster zone as fires kill dozens

"That box you tick gives police access to your DNA if you ever need it," she said.

After detectives searched through the DNA database, they reached out to Truscott and her family, informing them that their DNA matched human remains found in Alderley.

"That's where the story sort of started for us," Truscott said. 

"The next couple of days there [were] several conversations, emails with police."

Truscott supplied investigators with her lineage information and family tree which provided police with a roadmap of potential matches for the unidentified woman.

After months of searching, Glover was formally identified on Thursday.

"We can put a name and a face to this tragic discovery," Superintendent Andrew Massignham said.

"The next piece of this investigative jigsaw puzzle is (to) try to establish who knew Ms Glover so we can build a victim profile of her."

READ MORE: Australian jailed in China releases rare message

Although the two had never met and their relation to each other is still unknown, Truscott says she and her family are hopeful that "Tanya's killer (will be) brought to justice."

The Australian Federal Police is using the same genealogy tracking technology in over 2500 long-term missing persons cases.

"Supplying your DNA, adding it to a database like that, it's going to help bring people home," Truscott said.

Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox.

William Tyrrell's ex-foster parents in court over Sydney property sale

William Tyrrell's former foster parents have faced court over allegations they rigged the sale of a property they owned on Sydney's upper north shore.

Police allege the pair – who cannot be identified – placed a dummy bidder to bump up the auction price of the Killara home, in December 2020.

They were each charged with one count of dishonestly obtaining financial advantage or causing disadvantage by deception.

READ MORE: Hawaiian island declared a disaster zone as fires kill dozens

William Tyrrell's foster parents

During a brief hearing in Parramatta Local Court on Friday, prosecutors said they would introduce a lesser, regulatory charge and dismiss the existing allegations.

Police are awaiting authorisation from the NSW Department of Fair Trading to lay the new charges.

The couple's lawyer told the court an agreement was reached late on Thursday evening they would plead guilty to the new charges.

A next hearing date has been set for September 4.

Mystery surrounds the 2014 disappearance of William Tyrrell, who was three years old when he vanished from a property belonging to his grandma, in Kendall on NSW's mid-north coast.

Police have consistently sought answers in the years since his disappearance including conducting a thorough search of the Kendall property in December 2020.

READ MORE: Australian jailed in China releases rare message

William Tyrrell disappeared in September, 2014.

In June, 9News revealed detectives handed a brief to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) with evidence against William's foster mother recommending she be charged with perverting the course of justice and interfering with a corpse.

Lawyers for the foster mother called on detectives to respond to reports criminal proceedings were being considered against her over William's disappearance.

"The foster mother has always, and maintains, she has nothing to do with William's disappearance," the lawyers said in a statement.

The woman, aged in her late 50s, was acquitted in 2022 of lying to the NSW Crime Commission about hitting a different child with a wooden spoon.

– Reported with AAP.

Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox.

Fire that killed Queensland dad and five sons 'not suspicious'

Queensland Police believe the Russell Island fire that killed a man and his five sons was not intentionally lit.

Wayne Godinet and his five sons, Zac, 11, Harry, 10, four-year-old twins Kyza and Koah, and Nicky, three died almost a week ago when the blaze broke out at their Russell Island home.

The cause of the blaze has not been determined despite an extensive investigation, with police ruling the deadly incident "not suspicious".

READ MORE: Young tradie dead after accident on construction site in Melbourne's east

Wayne Godinet and his five children - Zac, 11, Harry, 10, four-year-old twins Kyza and Koah, and Nicky, three - died early on Sunday morning.

"Despite this, no suspicious circumstances have been identified," Queensland Police said.

"An extensive report will be prepared for the coroner now that the post-mortem examinations have been completed."

Police said they had updated the victim's families with the status of the investigation.

"Officers would like to thank the community for their ongoing support following this tragedy."

READ MORE: Hawaii wildfire death toll climbs to 53

A traditional Maori ceremony has held for the victims of the Russell Island house fire.

A traditional Maori ceremony described as "a lifting of the spirits" was held outside the remains of the home.

Earlier this week, mother Samantha Stephenson offered her thanks to the community.

She told 9News she was overwhelmed by grief but was grateful for the outpouring of love and support.

Police are still appealing for any information to assist with the investigation.

Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox.

Shingles sending thousands to hospital but only a select few eligible for vaccine

Up to one-third of Australians are prone to developing shingles, a condition that can flare up for those who've had chickenpox, but only a select age group is eligible for the free vaccine.

NSW Health data shows 1075 people visited hospital with the disease in their 60s compared to 780 people in their 70s but the vaccine is only free for those in the latter group, prompting experts to call for a change.

Michelle Washington had no idea the piercing nerve pain she suddenly experienced was due to shingles.

READ MORE: Fire that killed Queensland dad and five sons 'not suspicious'

Shingles can appear as a blistering rash in those who've previously had chickenpox.

"It was scary, I thought I was having a heart attack and because I didn't know what was wrong with me, that just perpetuates the worry," Washington said.

The 52-year-old went to an emergency department twice as it continued to affect her left side.

"It probably took three to four weeks to get over it," she said.

READ MORE: Murder-accused behind bars after deaths of wife, baby

Hundreds of Australians are ending up in hospital from shingles but only a select age group is eligible for the free vaccine.

Symptoms include a blistering rash that usually appears when the chickenpox virus reactivates.

Washington's symptoms were caught early enough and she took antivirals but she had no awareness of a vaccine.

"There is no way I would want this to happen to anyone else."

The vaccine is only free for 70-year-olds, with a catch-up program for anyone in their 70s available but due to expire in October.

READ MORE: Lahaina 'heartsick' as death toll climbs to 53 while search continues

"A significant proportion of people have long-term pain lasting for more than three months, sometimes years," infectious diseases expert Robert Booy told 9News.

"I think people vaccinated in their 60s would have a much bigger impact on the workforce, keeping people at work longer.

"The company GSK charges a lot of money for this vaccine.

"It has already cost the government $440 million budgeted for just over-70s."

A private prescription for the older vaccine Zostavax can cost about $190 and the newer one Shingrix, which is more effective and lasts about 10 years, is more than $500. 

A federal health department spokesperson said the catch-up program was extended due to the pandemic.

"The catch-up program was originally offered for five years until the end of October 2021, however, this has been extended to 31 October 2023."

Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox.

Murder-accused behind bars after deaths of wife, baby

A double murder accused has been remanded in custody over the deaths of a mother and baby whose bodies were found in a central Queensland home.

WARNING: Some readers may find content in this story distressing.

Matthew James Cox was arrested after walking into a Brisbane police station on Thursday, allegedly telling police his wife and her 11-week-old daughter were dead at the property hundreds of kilometres away in Rockhampton.

Cox, 31, did not appear in Brisbane Magistrates Court when his matter was mentioned briefly on Friday.

READ MORE: Hawaiian island declared a disaster zone as fires kill dozens

Matthew Cox, Tayla Cox and baby Murphy Margaret. Rockhampton.

He was unable to apply for bail due to the serious nature of the charges.

Cox is able to appear by video when his matter is mentioned again in the same court on August 21.

Police suspect Tayla Cox, 30, and baby Murphy Margaret Cox died on Tuesday, with Cox allegedly flying from Rockhampton to Brisbane that evening.

There was no history of domestic violence in the relationship and Cox and his wife were not known to police, Detective Superintendent Darrin Shadlow said on Thursday.

Matthew Cox and Tayla Cox. Rockhampton.

Officers discovered the bodies in a "quite confronting" scene at the property and weren't looking for anyone else in connection with the deaths, he said.

When asked whether it was a mental health-related incident, Shadlow said it "will obviously form part of our investigations".

Shadlow ruled out reports a gunshot had been heard at the address but would not comment on how the mother and baby died other than to say police came across "quite a confronting scene".

"A deceased infant child is always confronting for first responders," he said.

READ MORE: Australian jailed in China releases rare message

Two bodies found in Rockhampton home, Queensland.

The mother's family had been notified, "and as you'd expect, they're devastated", Shadlow said.

Cox's family provided the following statement to 9News on Thursday night.

"The family are devastated by the news today that we have not only lost a beautiful daughter-in-law Tayla but also our much loved granddaughter Murphy," parents Denis Cox and Linda Lind said.

"At this stage, we have very few other details and are in an absolute state of shock.

"We ask that the media respect our privacy while we grieve and try and process what has occurred."

READ MORE: Ex-Olympian, mum and daughter on landmark space flight

Two bodies found in Rockhampton home, Queensland.

Police will remain at the scene for days.

Cox's vehicle was seized at the Rockhampton airport for forensic examination.

"We have scientific and forensic officers currently at the scene … they will be there for some time examining the scene and the investigations will be ongoing," Shadlow said.

A crime scene was also established at an apartment in Fortitude Valley where police believe Cox was staying.

Cox is a TV account manager with Southern Cross Austereo and Tayla was on maternity leave.

The couple welcomed their child Murphy Margaret in June.

Neighbours were left shocked by the incident.

"I feel sick to my stomach. They're one of your generic, lovely families," a neighbour said.

– Reported with AAP.

Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox.