Tag Archives: oceania

Armed men fight on busy Melbourne freeway after crash

Drivers in Melbourne have been left terrified after armed men clashed in the middle of a busy freeway.

The chaos began about 2.30pm yesterday when two cars lost control after weaving through traffic on the Monash Freeway in Narre Warren in Melbourne's south-east.

Several masked men, some apparently armed with machetes and metal poles, then spilled out of the cars and began brawling in the middle of the freeway.

READ MORE: Captured president walked through detention office in New York

Several masked men then spilled out of the car and began brawling in the middle of the freeway and in front of other drivers.

Phone video shows some of the men approaching the windows of a car with a family inside.

Innocent drivers tried to speed away while others attempted to reverse to a nearby exit.

By the time police arrived at the scene, most of the men had fled into nearby bushland.

READ MORE: Bondi terror attack first responders and heroes honoured at SCG

Three lanes of the freeway were closed as the dog squad was brought in to search the area.

Only one man was questioned and was released without charge.

There were no injuries reported during the incident.

READ MORE: US military operation in Venezuela disrupts travel with hundreds of flights cancelled

Housing Minister Harriet Shing insisted Victoria's ban on machetes was having a positive impact on crime, but conceded incidents like this highlight areas for improvement.

"The vast majority of people who call Victoria home have an experience of safety, cohesion and connectedness," she said.

"There's always more work to do, however."

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Sporting stars join call for royal commission into Bondi terror attack

More than 60 Australian sporting stars have joined the chorus calling for a federal royal commission into the Bondi terror attack, antisemitism and radicalisation.

They have put their names to an open letter, as some of the heroes were honoured in Sydney today.

"We cannot remain silent. This is not who we are. This is not the Australia we represented," the letter says.

READ MORE: Captured president walked through detention office in New York

Olympians Dawn Fraser, Nova Peris and Jewish sprinter Steve Solomon left flowers at Bondi.

At what's left of the memorial at Bondi, Olympians Dawn Fraser, Nova Peris and Jewish sprinter Steve Solomon left flowers and consoled family members of the victims.

"If we fail to investigate with a royal commission – now, honestly, rigorously, without fear, we risk investigating funerals once again," Peris said.

"Come down off your high horse and stop trying to run for cover," Fraser told Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

READ MORE: Injured man found tied up in back of car in Sydney's west

England and Australia teams form a guard of honour for the Bondi terrorist attack first responders.

"If the Jewish community is calling for a royal commission then do the right thing by this community that has suffered enough."

Solomon said: "This is something that comes naturally to those who wear the green and gold, is to take on feedback, to learn from it, to get better and to improve as a community." 

Other signees included Ian Thorpe, Grant Hackett, Lleyton Hewitt, Scott Pendlebury and Isaac Heeney

While the prime minister has launched an inquiry into federal agencies, calls for a commonwealth royal commission are growing from the families of victims, the legal fraternity, business community and religious leaders.

READ MORE: World leaders react with condemnation and caution after US attack on Venezuela

Man dies after stolen car drives over road spikes in South Australia

A man has died after a stolen car crashed in regional South Australia, having allegedly reached speeds of 180km/h during a police pursuit.

The blue Ford sedan was reported stolen from a Port Augusta home on Friday afternoon, and was seen driving off from a petrol station in the same town about 10.30am yesterday.

It was seen by police 30 minutes later, with a pursuit briefly starting, before being stopped a short time later due to safety concerns.

READ MORE: Why is the US attacking Venezuela?

The blue Ford sedan was reported stolen from a Port Augusta home on Friday afternoon, and was seen driving off from a petrol station in the same town about 10.30am yesterday.

READ MORE: 'Devastating': Two miners dead after separate incidents in Queensland

The car was then seen several times in Whyalla, about 75 kilometres south of Port Augusta, and a police helicopter began to track its movements about 1.30pm.

It was seen travelling on Iron Knob Road, before heading west onto the Eyre Highway towards Kimba.

Police said the car hit speeds about 180km/h and was at times driving on the wrong side of the road.

The car briefly stopped at a rest stop about 2.40pm, allowing police to lay down road spikes.

The Ford hit the spikes and continued driving for about two kilometres before crashing.

The driver, a 33-year-old Hilton man, was found unconscious, with police attempting to revive him.

READ MORE: Australia issues South American travel warnings after USA strikes Venezuela

However, he was pronounced dead at the scene.

The death will be investigated as a death in custody, as the man was evading police at the time of the crash.

Police claim the decision to use road spikes was done to protect the safety of other drivers.

Major crash investigators initially attended the scene yesterday, and returned this morning to complete their investigation.

A report will be prepared for the coroner.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Venezuela’s VP condemns ‘kidnapping’ and says country will never be a US colony

Venezuela's executive vice president Delcy Rodriguez – the potential successor of captured president Nicolas Maduro – has demanded his release and declared the South American country will never be a US colony.

In the hours after Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were dragged from their bedrooms by US troops in a late-night military operation, Rodriguez condemned the "illegitimate kidnapping" when speaking on state television.

Rodriguez called for calm and unity, before contradicting Donald Trump's earlier claims that she had been sworn in as president of Venezuela.

READ MORE: Why is the US attacking Venezuela?

 Venezuela's Vice President Delcy Rodriguez in televised speech after Nicolas Maduro capture

READ MORE: US captures Venezuela's president and wife, removes them from the country

"We demand the immediate release of President Nicolas Maduro and his wife. The only president of Venezuela is President Nicolas Maduro," Rodriguez said.

The VP said Venezuela's government was prepared to defend itself, adding that the country's defence council had been activated.

She confirmed an official government response would be expected soon.

"To our Venezuela, to our people: There is a clear government here," she said.

Rodriguez emphasised that Venezuela "will never again be anyone's colony – neither of old empires, nor of new empires, nor of empires in decline".

READ MORE: Who is Nicolas Maduro? From bus driver to Venezuela president

She warned other countries that what the US did to Venezuela "they can do to anyone".

"This brutal use of force to bend the will of peoples can be done to any country," she said.

Rodriguez has served as Maduro's VP since 2018.

She has been previously described by Maduro as a "tiger" due to her loyalty and strong support of his socialist government.

Trump earlier claimed that Rodriguez had already been formally established as president and was "willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again".

He also said the US would assume control of Venezuela for the time being.

Speaking from Mar-a-Lago Trump said "we're going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition".

Trump confirmed Maduro's capture by posting a photo on Truth Social of Maduro, blindfolded, handcuffed, wearing a grey Nike tracksuit and holding a bottle of water on board the warship USS Iwo Jima on its way to New York.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Trump attacked Venezuela and arrested its president. Is that legal?

On November 2, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles told Vanity Fair that land strikes in Venezuela would require the approval of Congress.

She said if Donald Trump "were to authorise some activity on land, then it's war, then (we'd need) Congress".

Days later, Trump administration officials privately told members of Congress much the same thing – that they lacked the legal justification to support attacks against any land targets in Venezuela.

READ MORE: Venezuela's vice president says country will never be a US colony

President Donald Trump listens to a question during a news conference at Mar-a-Lago, Saturday, Jan. 3, 2026, in Palm Beach, Fla., as Secretary of State Marco Rubio watches. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Just two months later, though, the Trump administration has done what it previously indicated it couldn't.

It launched what Trump called a "large scale strike against Venezuela" and captured its president, Nicolas Maduro, to face charges. And it launched this regime change effort without the approval of Congress.

(Trump in November claimed he didn't need congressional authorisation for land action, but it clearly wasn't the consensus view in the administration.)

It appears the mission is, for now, limited to removing Maduro.

But as Trump noted, it did involve striking inside the country – the same circumstance some in the administration previously indicated required authorisation that it didn't have.

CNN reported in early November that the administration was seeking a new legal opinion from the Justice Department for such strikes.

And Trump in a news conference spoke repeatedly about not just arresting Maduro, but also running Venezuela and taking over its oil – comments that could certainly be understood to suggest this was about more than arresting Maduro.

Legally dubious strikes inside another country – even ones narrowly tailored at removing a foreign leader – are hardly unheard of in recent American history.

But even in that context, this one is remarkable.

READ MORE: Why is the US attacking Venezuela?

Shifting justifications

That's because the Trump administration has taken remarkably little care to offer a consistent set of justifications or a legal framework for the attack.

And it doesn't even appear to have notified Congress ahead of time, which is generally the bare minimum in such circumstances.

A full explanation of the claimed justification has yet to be issued, but the early signs are characteristically confusing.

Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah said shortly after the strikes that Secretary of State Marco Rubio told him the attack was needed to, in Lee's words, "protect and defend those executing the arrest warrant" against Maduro.

"This action likely falls within the president's inherent authority under Article II of the Constitution to protect US personnel from an actual or imminent attack," Lee, a frequent critic of unauthorised foreign military action, said.

Hours later, Vice President JD Vance echoed that line.

"And PSA for everyone saying this was 'illegal': Maduro has multiple indictments in the United States for narcoterrorism," Vance said on X.

"You don't get to avoid justice for drug trafficking in the United States because you live in a palace in Caracas."

At a later news conference, Rubio echoed the line that the military had been supporting "a law enforcement function."

But there are many people living in other countries that are under indictment in the United States; it is not the US government's usual course to launch strikes on foreign countries to bring them to justice.

The administration also hadn't previously indicated that military force could be legally used for this reason.

Initially, Trump threatened land strikes inside Venezuela to target drug traffickers – this despite Venezuela being an apparently somewhat small player in the drug-trafficking game.

Later, the administration suggested strikes might be needed because Venezuela sent bad people into the United States.

And then, after initially downplaying the role of oil in the US pressure campaign against Venezuela and Maduro, Trump said he aimed to reclaim "the oil, land, and other assets that they previously stole from us."

The signals were confusing enough that even the hawkish Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina in mid-December indicated the administration lacked "clarity" in its messaging.

"I want clarity right here," Graham said.

READ MORE: US captures Venezuela's president and wife, removes them from the country

"President Trump is saying his days are numbered. That seems to me that he's gotta go. If it's the goal of taking him out because he's a threat to our country, then say it. And what happens next? Don't you think most people want to know that?"

Despite the focus on the law enforcement operation, Trump at the news conference said the United States would now participate in running Venezuela, at least temporarily. And he repeatedly spoke about its oil.

"We're going to rebuild the oil infrastructure," Trump said, adding at another point: "We're going to run the country right."

And even if the administration had offered a more consistent justification, that doesn't mean it would be an appropriate one.

A controversial 1989 memo

The most recent major example of using the US military for regime change is the war in Iraq.

That war was authorised by Congress in 2002. The broader war on terror was authorised by Congress in 2001, after the 9/11 attacks.

Since then, administrations have sought to justify several military actions in the Middle East using those authorisations – sometimes dubiously.

But Venezuela is in an entirely different theatre.

While many have compared the effort in Venezuela to Iraq, the better comparison – and one the administration apparently intends to make – is Panama in 1989.

Like in Venezuela, Panama's leader at the time, Manuel Noriega, was under US indictment, including for drug-trafficking. And like in Venezuela, the operation was less a large-scale war than a narrowly tailored effort to remove the leader from power.

The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel in 1980 had concluded that the FBI didn't have the authority to apprehend and abduct a foreign national to face justice. But George H.W. Bush administration's OLC quietly reversed that in the summer of 1989.

READ MORE: Who is Nicolas Maduro? From bus driver to Venezuela president

A memo written by William P. Barr, who would later become attorney general in that Bush administration and Trump's first administration, said a president had "inherent constitutional authority" to order the FBI to take people into custody in foreign countries, even if it violated international law to do so.

That memo was soon used to justify the operation to remove Noriega. (As it happens, Noriega was captured January 3, 1990.)

But that memo remains controversial to this day. It's also an extraordinarily broad grant of authority, potentially allowing US military force anywhere

And the situation in Venezuela could differ in that it's a larger country that could prove tougher to control with its leader in foreign custody. It also has significant oil wealth, meaning other countries could take an interest in what happens there next. (China has called the attack a "blatant use of force against a sovereign state".)

In both the news conference and an interview with Fox News, Trump invoked the possibility of further military option, reinforcing that this could be about more than just arresting Maduro.

That also means the questions about Trump's legal authorities could again be tested – just as he's already tested them with his legally dubious strikes on alleged drug boats and other actions in the region.

What's clear is that Trump is seeking to yet again test the limits of his authority as president – and Americans' tolerance for it. But this time he's doing it on one of the biggest stages yet.

And the story of his stretching of the law certainly isn't over.

Operation Absolute Resolve: The US mission to capture Maduro

The US mission to capture Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro was planned over many months and involved more than 150 aircraft.

General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said US intelligence agencies had tracked Maduro to "understand how he moved, where he lived, where he travelled, what he ate, what he wore".

"The operation, known as Operation Absolute Resolve, was discreet, precise and conducted during the darkest hours of January 2, and was the culmination of months of planning and rehearsal — an operation that frankly only the United States military could undertake," Caine said in a press conference at Mar-a-Lago with US President Donald Trump.

READ MORE: Why is the US attacking Venezuela?

CNN previously reported that the CIA had installed a small team inside Venezuela over the northern hemisphere summer to keep a close watch on Maduro's activities.

Caine said Operation Absolute Resolve involved more than 150 aircraft launched from 20 different bases on land and sea.

Among them were helicopters carrying an extraction force that began their flight into Venezuela at just 30 metres above the water.

The helicopters, safeguarded by a series of strikes carried out in the area, arrived at Maduro's compound about 1am ET (5pm AEDT).

The effort to capture Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, required multiple "self defence engagements" as the forces came under fire, Caine said, before flying out of Venezuela about 3.29am ET (7.29pm AEDT).

Maduro and his wife were subsequently transferred to the warship USS Iwo Jima, where they were then on their way to New York to stand trial.

READ MORE: Trump says US 'is going to run' Venezuela after capture of Maduro

"Failure of one component of this well-oiled machine would have endangered the entire mission, and failure is never an option for America's joint force," Caine said.

CNN reports on a source saying "a handful of troops sustained bullet and shrapnel wounds, but none are life-threatening".

Trump earlier told Fox News that "a couple of guys were hit. But they came back and they're supposed to be in pretty good shape."

Caine said one US aircraft was struck during the operation, "but remained flyable".

He also highlighted the role of intelligence teams in supporting the mission in real time.

"Our air and ground intelligence teams provided real time updates to the ground force, ensuring those forces could safely navigate the complex environment without unnecessary risk."

Maduro was 'trying to get into safe place'

Trump said Maduro could have been killed.

"It could have happened," he said.

"He was trying to get into a safe place. You know, the safe place's all steel, and he wasn't able to make it to the door because our guys were so fast."

The US military "went through the opposition so fast", Trump said, while also noting that "there was a lot of opposition".

READ MORE: Venezuelan president and wife on US warship heading to New York. Here's what to know

"People were wondering, do we get them by surprise? Sort of surprised, but they were waiting for something. It was a lot of opposition. There was a lot of gunfire," he said.

Trump said lights in Caracas were shut off during the operation.

"No nation in the world could achieve what America achieved yesterday," Trump said this morning.

"In just a short period of time, all Venezuelan military capacities were rendered powerless as the men and women of our military, working with us, law enforcement, successfully captured Maduro in the dead of night.

"It was dark, the lights of Caracas were largely turned off due to a certain expertise that we have.

"It was dark and it was deadly."

US prepared for second wave of attack

Trump praised the US operation, calling it a success and emphasising that no American service members were killed and no US military equipment was lost.

He said it involved extensive US military assets.

"If you would have seen what I saw last night, you would have been very impressed," Trump said.

READ MORE: Who is Nicolas Maduro? From bus driver to Venezuela president

"I'm not sure that you'll ever get to see it, but it was an incredible thing to see not a single American service member was killed and not a single piece of American equipment was lost.

"We had many helicopters, many planes, many, many people involved in that fight."

Trump said the US was prepared to mount a second attack on Venezuela.

"We were prepared to do a second wave if we needed to do so — we actually assumed that a second wave would be necessary, but now it's probably not," he said.

"The first wave, if you'd like to call it that, the first attack was so successful, we probably don't have to do a second, but we're prepared to do a second wave, a much bigger wave, actually."

– Reported with CNN

Who is Nicolas Maduro? From bus driver to Venezuela president

Nicolas Maduro, who rose from unionised bus driver to Venezuelan president and oversaw his country's democratic undoing and economic collapse, was captured on Saturday during an attack by US forces on his capital.

US President Donald Trump, in an early morning social media post, announced Maduro's capture.

Venezuela's vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, later announced that the whereabouts of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, remained unknown.

Trump's attorney general, Pam Bondi, said Maduro and Flores would face charges after an indictment in New York.

Maduro's fall was the culmination of months of stepped-up US pressure on various fronts.

READ MORE: Trump posts photo of captured Venezuelan president

He had spent the last months of his presidency fuelling speculation over the intentions of the US government to attack and invade Venezuela with the goal of ending the self-proclaimed socialist revolution that his late mentor and predecessor, Hugo Chávez, ushered in 1999. Maduro, like Chávez, cast the United States as Venezuela's biggest threat, railing against Democratic and Republican administrations for any efforts to restore democratic norms.

Maduro's political career began 40 years ago. In 1986, he traveled to Cuba to receive a year of ideological instruction, his only formal education after high school. Upon his return, he worked as a bus driver for the Caracas subway system, where he quickly became a union leader. Venezuela's intelligence agencies in the 1990s identified him as a leftist radical with close ties to the Cuban government.

Maduro eventually left his driver job and joined the political movement that Chávez organised after receiving a presidential pardon in 1994 for leading a failed and bloody military coup years earlier. After Chávez took office, the former youth baseball player rose through the ranks of the ruling party, spending his first six years as a lawmaker before becoming president of the National Assembly. He then served six years as foreign minister and a couple months as vice president.

READ MORE: Venezuelan president and wife on US warship heading to New York. Here's what to know

Appointed the political heir to Chávez

Chávez used his last address to the nation before his death in 2013 to anoint Maduro as his successor, asking his supporters to vote for the then-foreign affairs minister should he die. The choice stunned supporters and detractors alike. But Chávez's enormous electoral capital delivered Maduro a razor-thin victory that year, giving him his first six-year term, though he would never enjoy the devotion that voters professed for Chávez.

Maduro married Flores, his partner of nearly two decades, in July 2013, shortly after he became president. He called her the "first combatant", instead of first lady, and considered her a crucial adviser.

Maduro's entire presidency was marked by a complex social, political and economic crisis that pushed millions into poverty, drove more than 7.7 million Venezuelans to migrate and put thousands of real or perceived government opponents in prison, where many were tortured, some at his direction. Maduro complemented the repressive apparatus by purging institutions of anyone who dared dissent.

Venezuela's crisis took hold during Maduro's first year in office. The political opposition, including the now-Nobel Peace Prize winner María Corina Machado, called for street protests in Caracas and other cities. The demonstrations evidenced Maduro's iron fist as security forces pushed back protests, which ended with 43 deaths and dozens of arrests.

Maduro's United Socialist Party of Venezuela would go on to lose control of the National Assembly for the first time in 16 years in the 2015 election. Maduro moved to neutralise the opposition-controlled legislature by establishing a pro-government Constituent Assembly in 2017, leading to months of protests violently suppressed by security forces and the military.

More than 100 people were killed and thousands were injured in the demonstrations. Hundreds were arrested, causing the International Criminal Court to open an investigation against Maduro and members of his government for crimes against humanity. The investigation was still ongoing in 2025.

In 2018, Maduro survived an assassination attempt when drones rigged with explosives detonated near him as he delivered a speech during a nationally televised military parade.

Bedeviled by economic problems

Maduro was unable to stop the economic free fall. Inflation and severe shortages of food and medicines affected Venezuelans nationwide. Entire families starved and began migrating on foot to neighboring countries. Those who remained lined up for hours to buy rice, beans and other basics. Some fought on the streets over flour.

Ruling party loyalists moved the December 2018 presidential election to May and blocked opposition parties from the ballot. Some opposition politicians were imprisoned; others fled into exile. Maduro ran virtually unopposed and was declared winner, but dozens of countries did not recognise him.

READ MORE: Why is the US attacking Venezuela?

Months after the election, he drew the fury after social media videos showed him feasting on a steak prepared by a celebrity chef at a restaurant in Turkey while millions in his country were going hungry.

Under Maduro's watch, Venezuela's economy shrank 71 per cent between 2012 and 2020, while inflation topped 130,000 per cent. Its oil production, the beating heart of the country, dropped to less than 400,000 barrels a day, a figure once unthinkable.

The first Trump administration imposed economic sanctions against Maduro, his allies and state-owned companies to try to force a government change. The measures included freezing all Venezuelan government assets in the US and prohibiting American citizens and international partners from doing business with Venezuelan government entities, including the state-owned oil company.

Out of options, Maduro began implementing a series of economic measures in 2021 that eventually ended Venezuela's hyperinflation cycle. He paired the economic changes with concessions to the US-backed political opposition with which it restarted negotiations for what many had hoped would be a free and democratic presidential election in 2024.

Maduro used the negotiations to gain concessions from the US government, including the pardon and prison release of one of his closest allies and the sanctions licence that allowed oil giant Chevron to restart pumping and exporting Venezuelan oil. The license became his government's financial lifeline.

Losing support in many places

Negotiations led by Norwegian diplomats did not solve key political differences between the ruling party and the opposition.

In 2023, the government banned Machado, Maduro's strongest opponent, from running for office. In early 2024, it intensified its repressive efforts, detaining opposition leaders and human rights defenders. The government also forced key members of Machado's campaign to seek asylum at a diplomatic compound in Caracas, where they remained for more than a year to avoid arrest.

Hours after polls closed in the 2024 election, the National Electoral Council declared Maduro the winner. But unlike previous elections, it did not provide detailed vote counts. The opposition, however, collected and published tally sheets from more than 80 per cent of electronic voting machines used in the election. The records showed Edmundo González defeated Maduro by a more than 2-to-1 margin.

Protests erupted. Some demonstrators toppled statues of Chávez. The government again responded with full force and detained more than 2000 people. World leaders rejected the official results, but the National Assembly sworn in Maduro for a third term in January 2025.

Trump's return to the White House that same month proved to be a sobering moment for Maduro. Trump quickly pushed Maduro to accept regular deportation flights for the first time in years. By the summer, Trump had built up a military force in the Caribbean that put Venezuela's government on high alert and started taking steps to address what it called narco-terrorism.

For Maduro, that was the beginning of the end.

Venezuelan president and wife on US warship heading to New York. Here’s what to know

US President Donald Trump announced early on Saturday morning (Saturday night AEDT) that the US carried out a "large-scale strike against Venezuela" and that President Nicolas Maduro and his wife had been captured, a stunning development that plunged the country into uncertainty after weeks of spiraling tensions.

"The United States of America has successfully carried out a large scale strike against Venezuela and its leader, President Nicolás Maduro, who has been, along with his wife, captured and flown out of the Country," he wrote on Truth Social.

Venezuela requested an urgent meeting of the United Nations Security Council in response to the attack, Foreign Minister Yván Gil Pinto said.

READ MORE: Why is the US attacking Venezuela?

"No cowardly attack will prevail against the strength of this people, who will emerge victorious," he said on Telegram, sharing the letter sent to the UN.

Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez said in an audio call with state-run VTV that the government doesn't know the whereabouts of Maduro and first lady Cilia Flores, demanding "immediate proof of life" from the Trump administration.

Speaking to Fox News on Saturday morning, Trump said that Maduro and his wife are aboard the USS Iwo Jima heading to New York. Earlier, in an interview with The New York Times, he declined to answer questions about whether he had sought congressional authorisation for the strike, saying he would address the issue at a news conference.

Here's what we know.

What has happened?

A CNN team witnessed several explosions and heard the sounds of aircraft early Saturday in the Venezuelan capital Caracas, and reported that some areas of the city were without electricity.

Videos verified by CNN showed helicopters roaring over Caracas, with plumes of smoke rising into the night sky. Footage also showed a large blaze and explosions at an airport in the city of Higuerote.

Hours after the strikes, CNN's Mary Mena said from Caracas that the capital was calm.

"We listened to many airplanes and helicopters passing by, but right now the city remains quiet, for the past two hours," she said. "We haven't heard people for example coming to the streets, and the state channel keeps repeating this message from the ministry of defense saying they want people to remain calm and they will deploy military forces across the country."

READ MORE: US captures Venezuela's president and wife, removes them from the country

The first blast witnessed by the CNN team was recorded about 1.50am (5.50pm AEDT).

"One was so strong, my window was shaking after it," CNN correspondent Osmary Hernandez said.

Several areas of the city were without power, and CNN journalists in the capital heard the sound of aircraft after the explosions.

One video obtained and verified by CNN showed two plumes of smoke rising into the night sky amid city lights. An orange glow could be seen at the base of one of the plumes. Then a flash in another location was briefly seen, followed by a dull booming sound.

Two sources familiar with the matter said that Maduro and his wife were dragged from their bedroom by US forces during the raid that led to their capture. The couple was captured in the middle of the night as they were sleeping, the sources said.

The raid, carried out by the US Army's elite Delta Force, did not lead to any US casualties, a US official said.

Why is it happening?

The Trump administration has for years said that Maduro was a criminal and has looked to prosecute him through the US legal system.

In 2020, during Trump's first term, Maduro was charged in the Southern District of New York for "narco-terrorism", conspiracy to import cocaine, and related charges.

The Trump administration offered a $US15 million ($22 million) bounty for Maduro's arrest. That bounty was increased to $US25 million ($37 million) in the waning days of the Biden administration, in early January 2025, and was increased again, to $US50 million ($74 million), in August 2025 after Trump took office for a second term and designated Cartel de los Soles as a foreign terrorist organization. The administration has claimed that Maduro is the leader of that group, which it describes as a criminal organisation.

Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee said Secretary of State Marco Rubio told him that Maduro was arrested to stand trial in the US.

"He informed me that Nicolás Maduro has been arrested by US personnel to stand trial on criminal charges in the United States, and that the kinetic action we saw tonight was deployed to protect and defend those executing the arrest warrant," Lee posted on X early Saturday.

In recent weeks, Trump had repeatedly warned that the US was preparing to take new action against alleged drug trafficking networks in Venezuela and that strikes on land will start "soon".

Trump's pressure campaign on Maduro has included strikes destroying more than 30 boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean in what the US has described as a counter-narcotics campaign. Trump last month ordered a blockade of sanctioned oil tankers coming to and leaving Venezuela.

The CIA carried out a drone strike in December on a port facility on the coast of Venezuela, CNN reported last month, citing sources, marking the first known US attack on a target inside that country.

How has the international community reacted?

Several world leaders have reacted with concern to the US operation.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he "wants to establish the facts" and speak to Trump about the military operation in Venezuela, according to the UK's PA Media news agency.

"I always say and believe we should all uphold international law," Starmer said, adding that Britain was "not involved in any way" in the strike on Caracas, PA Media reported.

Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said in a post on X that the commission "stand(s) by the people of Venezuela and support(s) a peaceful and democratic transition. Any solution must respect international law and the UN Charter."

Meanwhile, Venezuela's allies Russia and Iran condemned the US attack.

The Russian foreign ministry denounced what it called an "act of armed aggression against Venezuela" by the US, calling any "excuses" given to justify such actions "untenable".

"We reaffirm our solidarity with the Venezuelan people and our support for the Bolivarian leadership's course of action aimed at protecting the country's national interests and sovereignty," a statement from the foreign ministry said. "Venezuela must be guaranteed the right to determine its own destiny without any destructive, let alone military, interference from outside."

Similarly, the Iranian foreign ministry said the attack violates Venezuela's sovereignty and territorial integrity as well as the UN charter, Iranian state news outlet Press TV reported.

What comes next?

What happens next in Venezuela is far from clear. The country's constitution states that power will pass to Maduro's vice president, Delcy Rodríguez.

But the future of the regime is in doubt, and the opposition – within and outside the country – will likely see this moment as a critical opportunity.

Venezuela's opposition says the rightful president is the exiled politician Edmundo Gonzalez.

Amid the uncertainty, there are a range of scenarios.

If the constitutional path – Article 233 – is followed, in the "absolute absence" of the president, the executive vice president – Delcy Rodriguez – takes over and calls for an election within 30 days. The newly elected president then serves a full six-year term.

The regime collapses and its senior figures resign or flee, the most likely opposition candidate is Edmundo González Urrutia, who ran in the 2024 election. Gonzales, an academic and long-time diplomat, is now in exile in Spain. He is supported by the recent winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, democratic activist María Corina Machado. Speaking in Oslo last month after receiving the prize, Machado said her movement was preparing for "an orderly and peaceful transition" once Maduro was gone. She said in December that González had invited her to be vice-president and that "the vast majority" of the police and armed forces would follow the new administration's orders once the political transition began.

There could also be a military takeover. But the current defence minister, Vladimir Padrino López, has spoken out against the US strikes, saying Venezuela would resist the presence of foreign troops in the country. "This invasion represents the greatest outrage the country has suffered," he said.

World leaders react with condemnation and caution after US attack on Venezuela

World leaders have responded with a mixture of condemnation and caution after US President Donald Trump captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and wife Cilia Flores, and declared the US would seize control of the South American nation.

Trump posted an image of a handcuffed and blindfolded Maduro on board a flight bound for the US on Truth Social before claiming his administration would "run the country" until a judicious transition.

Vice President JD Vance and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio both supported the large-scale strike on Venezuela, while Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed the captured pair have been indicted on narco-terrorism and cocaine importation conspiracy charges

READ MORE: Trump attacked Venezuela and arrested its president. Is that legal?

READ MORE: Trump declares US will take control of Venezuela's massive oil reserves

The response from many foreign governments around the world – including Australia – has been measured.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the Australian government urges "all parties to support dialogue and diplomacy in order to secure regional stability and prevent escalation", but stopped short of criticising the operation itself.

"Australia has long held concerns about the situation in Venezuela, including the need to respect democratic principles, human rights and fundamental freedoms," the PM said.

"We continue to support international law and a peaceful, democratic transition in Venezuela that reflects the will of the Venezuelan people."

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese during a press conference at Parliament House in Canberra on Monday 22 December 2025. fedpol Photo: Alex Ellinghausen

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said she welcomed the news and that Maduro was now facing justice after serving as an "illegitimate president".

"Under his rule, Venezuela has endured years of repression, systemic human rights abuses, corruption, and the crushing of basic democratic freedoms," Ley said in a joint statement alongside Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister Michaelia Cash.

"The Venezuelan people deserve the chance to restore their sovereignty through a peaceful return to democracy.

"We should live in a world where dictators and despots face justice for their crimes."

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer initially said he was working to "establish the facts".

In a second update posted to X, Starmer said the UK supported a transition of power in Venezuela.

"We regarded Maduro as an illegitimate President and we shed no tears about the end of his regime," Starmer said.

https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2007540837224255602

French President Emmanuel Macron reacted with a similarly tempered response.

"The transition to come must be peaceful, democratic, and respectful of the will of the Venezuelan people. We hope that President Edmundo González Urrutia, elected in 2024, will be able to ensure this transition as quickly as possible," Macron wrote on X.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said his government would "take our time" to evaluate the developments in Venezuela.

Merz added that "a transition to a government legitimised by elections must be ensured" and said "political instability must not arise in Venezuela".

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a joint press conference after a trilateral meeting with Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides and Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis at the Citadel of David Hotel in Jerusalem, Monday Dec. 22, 2025. (Abir Sultan/Pool Photo via AP)

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu congratulated Trump in a post on X.

"Congratulations, President @realDonaldTrump for your bold and historic leadership on behalf of freedom and justice," Netanyahu wrote.

"I salute your decisive resolve and the brilliant action of your brave soldiers."

Other foreign governments swiftly responded with strong criticism of the US' military action.

The Mexican Ministry for Foreign Affairs said it "strongly condemns and rejects the military actions carried out unilaterally in recent hours by the armed forces of the United States of America against targets in the territory of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, in clear violation of Article 2 of the Charter of the United Nations".

READ MORE: Operation Absolute Resolve: The US mission to capture Maduro

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said that while Spain did not recognise Maduro's regime, his government also does not recognise an intervention that is a violation of international law and of which "pushes the region toward a horizon of uncertainty and belligerence".

"We call on all actors to think of the civilian population, to respect the United Nations Charter, and to articulate a fair and dialogued transition," Sanchez said.

Russia's foreign ministry condemned the action as an "act of armed aggression".

"The pretexts used to justify such actions are unfounded. Ideological animosity has prevailed over business pragmatism and the willingness to build relationships based on trust and predictability," the ministry said in a statement.

"In the current situation, it is important, first and foremost, to prevent further escalation and to focus on finding a way out of the situation through dialogue."

FILE - Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez looks on during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer inside 10 Downing Street, in London, Wednesday, Sept. 3, 2025. (Toby Melville, Pool Photo via AP, File)

READ MORE: What to know about the Swiss Alpine bar fire that killed 40

China's foreign ministry said in a statement that it was "deeply shocked".

"China is deeply shocked and strongly condemns the use of force by the US against a sovereign country and the use of force against the president of a country," a ministry statement said.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

US military operation in Venezuela disrupts travel with hundreds of flights cancelled

The US military operation that captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and flew him out of the country on Saturday also disrupted Caribbean travel at a busy travel time for the region.

No airline flights were crossing over Venezuela that day, according to FlightRadar24.com.

And major airlines cancelled hundreds of flights across the eastern Caribbean region and warned passengers that disruptions could continue for days after the Federal Aviation Administration imposed restrictions.

READ MORE: World leaders react with condemnation and caution after US attack on Venezuela

Palm Beach Aruba Caribbean,

Flights were cancelled to and from Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Aruba and more than a dozen other destinations in the Lesser Antilles island group north of Venezuela. Airlines waived change fees for passengers who had to reschedule flights.

But US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said on Saturday night that the restrictions would end at midnight EST and airlines would be able to resume normal operations on Sunday.

At the Queen Beatrix airport in Aruba, a popular holiday destination for US vacationers just 124 kilometers off Venezuela’s coast, officials said they expected a return to normal on Sunday after a day of cancelled flights that stranded travelers or blocked them from flying to the island.

In Barbados, Prime Minister Mia Mottley said at a news conference that “the consequences of the conflict have been exceedingly disruptive to both of our ports of entry,” an airport as well as a seaport from which cruise ships sail.

READ MORE: Why is the US attacking Venezuela?

In Puerto Rico, Lou Levine, his wife and their three children were due to return to the Washington, DC area on Saturday morning, but he woke up to his wife saying their flight was cancelled. He found out why when he checked his phone.

They first tried calling JetBlue to reschedule.

The airline called back about two hours later, but the agent was not able to help them. Levine and his wife saw others messaging JetBlue on social media and did the same.

The airline responded and booked them on a flight on Saturday, turning their weeklong New Year’s holiday into a two-week sojourn.

READ MORE: Australia issues South American travel warnings after USA strikes Venezuela

Venezuelan citizens dance during a rally on the Colombia-Venezuela border after the confirmation of Nicolas Maduro's capture.

Levine, a manager at a software company, said he is fortunate to have a flexible and understanding employer. But his daughter will be missing a week of high school. And then there are the unexpected expenses.

“I love it here. But we have dog-sitting and cat-sitting and car rental. It’s fine. It’s just really painful on the wallet,” Levine said.

The Levines hoped to book an earlier trip back if possible.

READ MORE: Trump declares US will take control of Venezuela's massive oil reserves

This weekend was already past the peak 13-day holiday period when AAA projected that 122.4 million Americans would travel at least 80 kilometers from home, but there were plenty of travelers still trying to squeeze in some more time on tropical beaches before heading back to colder temperatures.

“The Caribbean is a top destination this time of the year,” AAA spokesperson Aixa Diaz said. “We do have a lot of people who are trying to get back home this weekend ahead of work and school on Monday.”

Diaz said “it’s understandable we want to unplug,” but travellers should keep track of what's going on and allow airlines to send them phone alerts.

READ MORE: Trump attacked Venezuela and arrested its president. Is that legal?

An announcement by Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport in San Juan, Puerto Rico, that was posted on the social platform X said restrictions were put in place because of the “security situation related to military activity” in Venezuela.

As a result most commercial flights to and from the airport that are operated by US airlines were suspended or canceled.

Foreign airlines and military aircraft were not included in that restriction, the statement said.

Air Canada said its flights to the Caribbean were operating normally, though it gave travellers an option to rebook. Another Canadian airline, WestJet, said it canceled Aruba flights “out of an abundance of caution.”

READ MORE: Trump says US 'is going to run' Venezuela after capture of Maduro

All major US airlines cancelled flights across the Eastern Caribbean because of the restrictions and adjusted their schedules.

Nearly two dozen island destinations were affected by the cancellations, including Anguilla, Antigua, Curacao, St. Lucia and the US and British Virgin Islands.

But destinations farther to the west like the Dominican Republic and Jamaica were generally not affected.

New York-based JetBlue said it canceled about 215 flights “due to airspace closures across the Caribbean related to military activity.”

READ MORE: Venezuela's VP condemns 'kidnapping' and says country will never be a US colony

Dutch airline KLM said it too cancelled flights affecting thousands of passengers but planned to resume service Sunday to and from Curacao, Aruba, Bonaire and other islands.

The flight disruptions also affected some travelers booked for Caribbean cruises.

Cruise operator Virgin Voyages said airline travelers unable to make it to San Juan in time for an upcoming cruise departure would be able to get a full credit for a future trip.

READ MORE: Who is Cilia Flores, Maduro's wife and 'first combatant'?