Tag Archives: oceania

‘We’re gutted’: Organisers pull plug on Aussie music festival

Australian metal music festival Park Waves has been cancelled just two months before it was to go ahead due to "rising costs".

Australian band Parkway Drive was due to headline the 11-date travelling metalcore festival, with tickets sold for gigs in NSW, Queensland, Victoria, Western Australia and South Australia during February and March next year.

Organisers confirmed the "devastating" news that the festival will no longer go ahead and blamed it on a number of issues, including financial challenges.

READ MORE: Hundreds of jobs on the line as caravan maker collapses

Park Waves festival

READ MORE: Trump gives green light to release MRI results

"With a heavy heart, we've had to make a difficult decision. We've tried everything. We're gutted," organisers said in a statement on its website.

"We know everyone will be understandably disappointed."

Headlining act Parkway Drive took to Instagram to apologise to fans.

The band said Park Waves was yet another festival casuality in the tough Australian music scene.

Parkway Drive

"This is a message we never imagined we'd have to write, and it weighs heavily on us. Park Waves Australia has been cancelled," Parkway Drive said in a statement.

"Just writing this feels like a kick in the guts, but here we are – another festival being crushed by the rising costs across our entertainment industry.

"We've tried every possible option to keep this dream alive, but the reality of the circumstances won't allow for it."

Ticketholders will be refunded the price of tickets and booking fees.

"Please know that your support is what keeps this culture alive and standing strong through the worst of times," the band added.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DRvzVq3k3is/

Park Waves was set to be an inaugral Australian festival showcasing Parkway Drive as the main act alongside several other metal bands, including Amity Affliction, Northlane and Story of the Year.

It was billed as a "never-before-witnessed" event with circus performers, carnival rides, food and sideshow alleys.

Plenty of legacy festivals have fallen victim to Australia's turbulent live music scene.

So far this year, Good Life, A Festival Called Panama, Esoteric, Souled Out, Groovin the Moo and Forth Valley Blues have been forced to axe their events.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Countdown to the under-16s social ban is on, so what apps are about to be restricted?

With the under-16s social media ban set to come into effect on December 10, platforms have already begun preparing for the world-first measure.

So which platforms are set to be restricted, and which are set to remain accessible for under-16s?

What platforms are getting banned for under-16s?

The federal government gradually announced that Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube, Kick, Reddit, and, most recently, Twitch will be included in the ban, which will take effect on December 10.

READ MORE: Australia's world-first social media ban comes into effect this month. Here is what it will look like

Facebook Homepage Closeup on LCD Screen, Chrome Web Browser

Why are these platforms getting banned?

These platforms are being restricted after the government determined that the risks of social media for young Australians outweigh the positives.

The growing dangers of cyberbullying, harmful content and online predators have caused the Australian government to step in and ban the platforms for people under the age of 16, with more potentially on the way.

The companies that own these platforms have been warned that if they do not take reasonable steps to ensure that under-16s are off their platforms by December 10, they could face hefty fines of up to $50 million.

What is not getting banned?

Certain social platforms, including Messenger Kids, WhatsApp, Kids Helpline, Google Classroom and YouTube Kids, are exempt from the ban. 

Discord, a popular social platform predominantly used for gaming, is also not included in the ban.

READ MORE: Under-16s are set to lose their data in the looming social media ban. Here's how to save it

Discord logo on smartphone screen (Getty)

Julie Inman Grant, the eSafety Commissioner has described Discord as "a social chat platform originally designed for gamers, now widely used by communities of all kinds", however, it is excluded from the social media ban.

Similarly, Roblox also is not included in the world-first ban.

The video game is massively popular with children and features communication features with no minimum age to play.

READ MORE: Are video games impacted by Australia's world-first social media ban?

The company has confirmed it will roll out age verification systems in Australia, New Zealand and the Netherlands from this month, with a worldwide rollout to follow in the new year.

What could be banned in the future?

The government have made it clear that the current list of platforms in the social media ban is subject to change, with the eSafety commissioner stating she won't "totally turn off the spigot."

"We watched what American kids did when TikTok went blank. They went to Rednote, they went to Lemonade, which is an Instagram clone," eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant said.

READ MORE: The apps Australian kids are switching to ahead of social media ban

Julie Inman Grant. eSafety Commissioner, during a Senate estimates hearing at Parliament House in Canberra on Thursday 30 May 2024. fedpol Photo: Alex Ellinghausen

"We've been talking to the likes of Yubo, which is a French site. We expected there will be some migration, and some of these will become age-restricted social media platforms," she said.

"It's not going to be perfect, but the normative change in the mid to long term will be significant."

Communications Minister Anika Wells has described the policy as a "whack-a-mole situation" as new platforms and apps continue to show up for teens to use.

"Big tech is innovative, agile and moves quickly, and we must do the same," Wells said.

READ MORE: Australia to 'accelerate' broad adoption of AI under new national plan

Communications Minister Anika Wells speaking at a press conference.

"We're trying to get to the platforms that do the most harm."

"I've also made the point, LinkedIn is currently an exempt platform."

"If everybody ends up on LinkedIn, and LinkedIn becomes a place where there is online bullying, algorithms targeting 13 to 16-year-olds in a way that's deteriorating their mental and physical health, then we will go after LinkedIn.

"That's why all platforms are on notice.

"If we find that because they've been locked out of Snapchat, Instagram, TikTok, what have you, they end up on Lemon8, then we will look at whether the harm has transferred there and whether we need to add them to the list."

"We'll have more to say about Lemon8 this week, so stay tuned."

The ban is set to come into effect on December 10, with Meta already starting to lock under-16s out of their accounts. 

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Even platforms exempt from the social media ban aren’t safe

The list of age-restricted social media platforms could grow even after Australia's under-16s social media ban comes into effect on December 10.

Even platforms that are are currently exempt from the ban could later be included.

Minister for Communications Anika Wells and eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant anticipate that under-16s will migrate to other platforms when their Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok accounts are deactivated next week.

READ MORE: Australia's world-first social media ban comes into effect this month. Here is what it will look like

Close-up group of teenagers using mobile phones in school corridor

Some will move to platforms that are exempt, like Discord and Messenger, but Wells and Inman Grant say they won't hesitate to age-restrict those platforms if necessary.

"We will be watching the migratory patterns, and we'll be talking to these companies," Inman Grant said.

"It's not going to be perfect, but the normative change in the mid-to long-term will be significant."

Wells singled out Lemon8, a photo and video-sharing social media platform developed by ByteDance, the same Chinese technology company behind TikTok.

Many US teens migrated to the platform when they briefly lost access to TikTok at the start of the year.

READ MORE: Are we really in an AI tech bubble and what happens if it bursts?

Shanghai,China-Jan.15th 2025: Xiaohongshu (RedNote), TikTok and Lemon8 app icons. Assorted social media mobile applications

"If we find that because they've been locked out of Snapchat, Instagram, TikTok, what have you, they end up on Lemon8, then we will look at whether the harm has transferred there and whether we need to add them to the list," Wells said.

"We'll have more to say about Lemon8 this week, so stay tuned."

What sites and apps are not included in Australia's social media ban?

Platforms currently exempt from the under-16s social media ban include:

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • Google Classroom
  • LEGO Play
  • Messenger
  • Pinterest
  • Roblox
  • Steam and Steam Chat
  • WhatsApp
  • YouTube Kids
  • LinkedIn

The eSafety Commissioner said that this list is not final and more platforms may be made exempt at a later date.

Why are these sites exempt?

These sites have been excluded from the age-based social media ban because they fall under one of several exempt classes.

They include:

  • messaging
  • email
  • making calls
  • online games
  • education
  • professional development
  • health
  • platforms that provide information about products or services

But platforms that are currently exempt are not guaranteed to stay that way.

Many platforms serve multiple purposes and the eSafety Commissioner will update the list of exempt and age-restricted platforms based on each platform's primary purpose.

That purpose may change as the ban comes into effect.

For example, online games that are currently exempt but allow social interaction through features like direct messaging and livestreaming may become age-restricted if the platform's primary purpose changes.

"LinkedIn is currently an exempt platform," the Minister for Communications said.

"If everybody ends up on LinkedIn, and LinkedIn becomes a place where there is online bullying, algorithms targeting 13- to 16-year-olds in a way that's deteriorating their mental and physical health, then we will go after LinkedIn, and that's why all platforms are on notice."

READ MORE: The apps Australian kids are switching to ahead of social media ban

Linkedin

What sites and apps are included in Australia's social media ban?

Social media platforms must meet four specific conditions to be age-restricted under the ban.

Those conditions are:

  1. its sole or significant purpose is to enable online social interaction between two or more users
  2. it allows users to link or interact with other users
  3. it allows users to post material
  4. material is accessible or delivered to users in Australia

Several platforms have already been classified as age-restricted and under-16s will be unable to access existing accounts or create new ones from December 10.

These age-restricted platforms include:

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Snapchat
  • TikTok
  • X (formerly Twitter)
  • YouTube
  • Threads
  • Reddit
  • Kick
  • Twitch

Snapchat to start banning under 16s

Additional platforms may become age-restricted after the ban comes into effect and under-16s migrate to other sites and services.

"We watched what American kids did when TikTok went blank," Inman Grant said.

"They went to Rednote, they went to Lemon8, which is an Instagram clone.

"We expected there will be some migration, and some of these will become age restricted social media platforms."

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Google to be forced to pay $55 million fine

Internet giant Google will be forced to pay a $55 million fine for signing anti-competitive deals with the nation's two largest telcos that banned the pre-installation of competing search engines on smartphones. 

Federal Court Justice Mark Moshinsky approved the fine proposed by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission today, finding it should be significant enough to deter future anti-competitive behaviour. 

The penalty is one of the largest issued to the US tech giant, second to a $60 million fine ordered by the court in 2022 for secretly collecting location data from some Android phone users. 

READ MORE: Hundreds of jobs on the line as caravan maker collapses

The competition watchdog launched legal action against Google Asia Pacific in August over deals with Telstra and Optus that ran from December 2019 to March 2021. 

The contracts required the telcos to pre-install Google's Search app on Android smartphones, set it as the default search option on the devices, and banned the pre-installation of competing search services. 

In exchange, the telecommunications companies receive a share of advertising revenue from Google search results shown on the devices. 

Google had admitted the deals and agreed with the commission that they were "likely to have the effect of hindering competition within the market in Australia," Moshinsky said in his findings. 

The $55 million penalty proposed by the commission and agreed to by Google was within the appropriate range for the law, he said, and should discourage similar anti-competitive acts. 

"The cases emphasise that the primary if not sole purpose of civil penalties is deterrence of further contravening conduct of a like kind," Moshinsky said. 

"I'm satisfied that the proposed total penalty is a sufficiently significant figure to achieve the object of deterrence, both specific and general."

SMH Generic .Law and Order Sydney Courts Crime Justice Legal Lawyers  Photos shows, Supreme and Federal Court Building Queens Square. Photo by.  Monday 25,  February, 2019

Telstra, Optus and TPG have signed court-enforceable undertakings not to make similar anti-competitive arrangements with the tech company in future, and the commission's lawyer told the court it would not seek further action against the telcos. 

Stamping out anti-competitive behaviour on digital platforms was vital to ensuring consumers could access the best technology for their needs, commission deputy chair Mick Keogh said, particularly as more advanced, artificially intelligent options emerged. 

"This penalty should send a strong message to all businesses that there are serious and costly consequences for engaging in anti-competitive conduct," he said.

"Search tools, including those that incorporate AI, are rapidly changing how we search for information and it's critical that competitors to Google can gain meaningful exposure to Australian consumers."

The court ruling comes nine months after the commission wrapped its five-year inquiry into Digital Platform Services, which recommended mandatory codes of practice to boost competition and greater protections against unfair trading practices. 

Google dominates web search queries in Australia, with Statcounter estimating it delivered 91 per cent of search results over the year to November, followed by Bing (6.2 per cent) and Yahoo (1.35 per cent).

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Food authority issues warning over common act in Aussie kitchens

Countless Australians have unknowingly risked food poisoning by leaving meat to defrost on the kitchen bench.

It's a common mistake the NSW Food Authority has warned against.

Raw red meat and poultry can carry dangerous bacteria including salmonella, listeria, campylobacter and E. coli, which can cause food poisoning.

READ MORE: Hundreds of jobs on the line as caravan maker collapses

The NSW Food Authority shared this image to its official Facebook page.

Cooking meat typically destroys these bacteria, but it's not guaranteed if the meat has been thawed incorrectly.

Leaving frozen meat to defrost on a bench at room temperature is the worst offender.

That's because bacteria like salmonella and E. coli grow rapidly in the 'temperature danger zone' between five and 60 degrees celsius.

Some microorganisms may even produce heat-resistant spores in the 'temperature danger zone'.

These can't be destroyed through cooking and can cause serious illness if ingested.

It's also dangerous to thaw frozen raw meat in warm water, though many Australians have used this method without knowing the risks.

Like thawing at room temperature, thawing in warm water exposes red meat and poultry to 'temperature danger zone' and should be avoided.

The only safe ways to thaw frozen raw meat are in the fridge, cold water, or the microwave, according to the NSW Food Authority.

READ MORE: Australia's happiest generation of workers revealed

Frozen meat which has been vacuum sealed and placed inside a fridge freezer.

Thawing in the fridge is the most time consuming method, as it can take several days for a whole chicken to fully thaw.

However, it is safe and allows thawed meat to be stored for up to one extra day before it needs to be cooked.

If thawing in cold water, make sure the meat is in airtight packaging or a leak proof bag before submerging it.

This method typically takes a few hours to thaw a whole chicken, however it is more labour intensive.

That's because the water needs to be changed every 30 minutes to ensure it stays cold.

Australians can also thaw meat in the microwave but only if they plan to cook it immediately after thawing.

This is because some areas may start to cook while being microwaved and it is unsafe to store partially cooked red meat or poultry.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Man injured in mystery Sydney shooting refusing to cooperate with police

Investigations into a suspected shooting in Sydney's south-west are being hampered by the victim's unwillingness to cooperate with police.

Police were called to Fairfield Hospital late last night after a 43-year-old man arrived with a gunshot wound to his leg.

It is not known where the shooting took place, or who the perpetrator may have been.

READ MORE: Man dies, another injured in retaining wall collapse in Brisbane

The man presented himself to Fairfield Hospital last night.

9News understands the victim has not been cooperative with police in presenting the circumstances of the shooting.

The man was then transferred to another hospital for treatment.

Police are investigating the incident, and have seized the car that the man was taken to hospital in for forensic examination.

A crime scene has not formally been declared, and police are urging anyone with information on the incident to call Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Are video games impacted by Australia’s world-first social media ban?

Australia's world-first social media ban will be implemented in a matter of days.

From December 10, children under 16 years of age will be barred from accessing or holding accounts on several social media platforms.

Popular platforms like Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat are part of the ban, but how will video game platforms used by children be impacted? We take a look at the ins and outs.

READ MORE: Will children under 16 get in trouble for accessing social media?

Young man wearing headset and play computer video games online - Home isolated for coronavirus outbreak

Will the social media ban affect video games?

Yes, some video game platforms will be impacted by the upcoming social media ban.

Whilst specific games themselves will not be impacted, platforms that children can play video games on, or can watch streamers play popular video games on will be part of the ban.

The key criteria for platforms to fall foul of the new legislation include having "the sole purpose, or a significant purpose, of the service is to enable online social interaction between two or more end-users," according to the website of the eSafety Commissioner.

"Platforms that have the sole or primary purpose of enabling messaging or online gaming are among a number of types of services that have been excluded under the legislative rules," it added.

However, some platforms are included and some platforms are excluded.

READ MORE: The little-known apps kids are switching to ahead of social media ban

eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant at a press conference at Parliament House in Canberra on Monday 1 December 2025.

What platforms are affected by the social media ban?

The main video game platform that falls under the ban is Twitch.

The site is an online streaming platform where users can broadcast live streams or view pre-recorded videos, and it is popular with streamers who show themselves playing video games.

Discord, a similar platform, has not been included in the ban as it stands.

Steam and Steam Deck, a platform where users can purchase and play video games on, has also not been included in the ban.

There has been no news about banning specific consoles or video games, despite both offering the ability to communicate with other users via text or audio chat.

For example, Playstation and Xbox consoles offer the ability for users to communicate with one another, even if the game they are playing doesn't have the infrastructure to do so.

Is Roblox included in the social media ban?

Roblox is another popular video game platform, particularly for children.

There is no minimum age for the platform, which is a game-creation platform where users can create their own games or play games designed by other users.

READ MORE: Noah learnt about the social media ban on social media. Now, he's fighting it in court

A child is seen playing a game on the Roblox platform. The platform will not be included in Australia's social media ban.

The platform, which also gives users the ability to communicate and chat with others, is not included in the social media ban.

However, the company has confirmed it will roll out age verification systems in Australia, New Zealand and the Netherlands from this month, with a worldwide rollout to follow in the new year.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Council row erupts over 100m footpath residents don’t want a bar of

Exclusive: Residents of a quiet cul-de-sac in Perth were confused when they first noticed workers marking the street outside their homes.

A letter sent out in early November had notified them that a footpath was soon to be installed on an adjoining street.

But families living on Godin Court didn't realise they were also in the firing line until contractors turned up on their front yards.

READ MORE: Leading Australian caravan maker collapses, 250 jobs at risk

Godin Court in Churchlands, Perth is a green and leafy cul-de-sac. Residents cant to keep it that way.

That's when they discovered a complicated design plan on the last page of the letter, which had a footpath drawn down one side of their street.

According to notes on the plan, construction of the 1.8m wide footpath would require the removal of plants, vegetation and other landscaping.

But they don't want a bar of it.

Jane*, who spoke to 9news.com.au on the condition of anonymity, said locals don't want to see their grassy yards replaced with metres of concrete.

"We live in a very quiet, secluded, green, safe cul-de-sac which is very family friendly," she said.

"The kids play cricket in the cul-de-sac, neighbours come out and stand under the trees, we congregate on the grass, we talk to each other.

"And having a nearly two-metre-wide concrete footpath [installed] is detrimental to our sense of community."

READ MORE: E-bike rider dies after garbage truck collision in Sydney

A design plan on the final page of the letter revealed Godin Court would also be getting a footpath.

She said the footpath will negatively impact multiple residents' front verges, where children play, and owners walk their dogs, without adding any real value.

Godin Court isn't a main thoroughfare and doesn't see much foot traffic during the day.

Dog walkers and bike riders come through sometimes, but it's a typically quiet street.

According to Jane and several other locals, they weren't properly informed or consulted about the footpath.

Many claim they did not receive early information flyers, and the November letter did not mention their street by name.

READ MORE: Weather whiplash as cities swelter, freeze on first day of summer

The letter sent to Godin Court residents at the start of November made no mention of the street.

It was only when neighbours started talking amongst each other that they realised what was at stake, just weeks before work was set to start.

City of Stirling Mayor Mark Irwin told 9news.com.au that information flyers were distributed to all residents in February 2025.

"The flyer provided advanced notification of a footpath and outlined the benefits and rationale for providing a safe and accessible path network," he said.

Jane claimed she and other residents never received the flyer.

The City of Stirling council was made aware that some residents of Godin Court did not receive the flyer and apologised.

However, Irwin also said that notifying residents with a letter on November 7 complies with the council's policy and procedures.

They require a minimum 14-day notification period for new footpath construction.

"After the recent notification letter, the City received several enquiries, primarily from residents of Godin Court," Irwin said.

READ MORE: Australia's happiest generation of workers revealed

Godin Court in Churchlands, Perth is a green and leafy cul-de-sac. Residents cant to keep it that way.

Despite a change.org petition and protests from some locals, works on the footpath are scheduled to start in early December.

Jane's just disappointed that their little slice of heaven will soon feature an extra 100m of concrete for no good reason.

"It just seems a waste of resources and unnecessary," she said.

"People are bothered by the lack of consultation and the lip service that's been given when we've pushed back."

*Name changed.

Have you got a story? Contact reporter Maddison Leach at Google Play.

Luigi Mangione’s lawyers seek to exclude key evidence

Luigi Mangione, the 27-year-old American man accused of killing a health insurance company executive in a brazen attack that sparked a national debate, has appeared in court as his lawyers seek to have his diary entries and other key evidence tossed from his state murder case.

He entered the New York courtroom through a side door on Monday (Tuesday AEDT) with his hands shackled, wearing a dark gray suit jacket. A court officer unshackled his hands as he reached the defence table.

Mangione was arrested at a McDonald's restaurant in Pennsylvania following a days-long manhunt after United Healthcare chief executive Brian Thompson, 50, was fatally shot on December 4, 2024, on a busy pavement in Manhattan.

READ MORE: Australia's happiest generation of workers revealed

During the arrest, law enforcement officers recovered several pieces of evidence from Mangione's backpack that authorities say tie him to the killing.

Mangione's lawyers argue police illegally searched his bag without a warrant, so that evidence should be barred from the state's case. Prosecutors denied the defence's claims and agreed to a hearing on the matter.

Mangione's defence team is battling prosecutors in two cases: Lawyers in his federal death penalty case also are trying to get much of the same evidence tossed. That case returns to court in January.

The hearing over the disputed evidence in the state case is expected to last several days, with both parties planning to call witnesses to testify, according to court documents.

In Monday's hearing, prosecutors showed the full surveillance video of Thompson being shot in front of a hotel, stumbling to the side before falling to the ground. They also played surveillance video inside the McDonald's as two officers first approached Mangione, with at least six more later joining them in the restaurant.

READ MORE: Leading Australian caravan maker collapses, 250 jobs at risk

UnitedHealthcare chief executive officer Brian Thompson.

As the videos played, Mangione appeared to watch them from the defence table, one finger resting on his chin.

The prosecution also played an emergency call made by the manager of McDonald's.

"I have a customer here that some other customers were suspicious of and he looks like the CEO shooter from New York," the manager is heard saying.

"So they're really upset, and they've come to me."

The caller stated the man was wearing a black jacket, medical mask and a tan beanie.

"The only thing you can see is his eyebrows," she said.

Mangione showed no visible signs of resistance in the surveillance video, which did not include audio.

Next to him is a backpack where police say they found writings they have described as a "manifesto" for the shooting.

READ MORE: Weather whiplash as cities swelter, freeze on first day of summer

Luigi Mangione being taken by officers into a Pennsylvania courthouse.

At one point, defence lawyer Karen Friedman-Agnifilo asked a police officer if anyone received the $US10,000 CrimeStoppers reward in the investigation, but Judge Gregory Carro sustained an objection from prosecutors.

In earlier court filings, Friedman-Agnifilo asked Carro to prevent the prosecution from showing the contents of Mangione's writings at the hearing, saying they could taint the jury pool.

She objected to the prosecution's use of the term "manifesto," calling it a "prejudicial, invented law-enforcement label."

She also asked the judge to allow at least one of Mangione's hands to be unshackled during the hearing so he can take notes.

In September, Carro dismissed the top two charges against Mangione – murder in the first degree in furtherance of an act of terrorism and murder in the second degree as a crime of terrorism – after he found the evidence had not established Mangione committed a terroristic act.

Mangione still faces nine charges in the state case, and the separate federal death penalty prosecution. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

Luigi Mangione supporters stand outside the Supreme Court on Friday, Feb. 21, 2025 in New York. (AP Photo/Stefan Jeremiah)

Key pieces of evidence seized

During Mangione's arrest last December, authorities seized several items from his backpack, including a handgun, a loaded magazine, and a notebook with handwritten entries – key pieces of evidence that prosecutors allege connect Mangione to the killing.

The recovered gun lines up with ballistic evidence from the Manhattan crime scene, prosecutors said in court documents.

Authorities have called the writings in the notebook a "manifesto," pointing to sections that detail his frustration with the healthcare industry and his intent to carry out an attack. Prosecutors said the entries "establish his responsibility for this vicious crime."

In a court filing, Friedman-Agnifilo argued the writings and all the items recovered from the backpack should not be admissible since police illegally searched the bag without a warrant, and there was no immediate threat to justify a warrantless search.

Prosecutors can overcome the challenge if they can prove the evidence would have inevitably been discovered legally during the course of the investigation.

Even if the judge rules in favour of Mangione, prosecutors still have evidence of his DNA or fingerprints on several items discarded by the shooter near the crime scene, according to court documents.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Weather whiplash as cities swelter, freeze on first day of summer

It was a tale of two coastlines for Australia's weather on the first day of summer yesterday, as Perth boiled while Melbourne froze.

The Victorian capital reached a chilly top of 16.1 degrees by mid-yesterday afternoon, its coldest summer day in four years, Weatherzone reported.

The website attributed the cold weather to a front that sent polar air over Victoria and southern New South Wales.

READ MORE: Will children under 16 get in trouble for accessing social media?

While Melbourne shivered, snow fell in the alpine country and temperatures stayed below freezing at Mount Hotham in Victoria and Thredbo in NSW.

Meanwhile, Perth sweltered under oppressive heat that reached 39 degrees in the city, and cracked 40 in some suburbs, Weatherzone said.

Geraldton's first day of summer saw it peak at 42.2 degrees.

READ MORE: Man allegedly shoots crossbow at police in Melbourne

This was reportedly due to a high-pressure system driving hot air toward western and north-western Australia.

Weatherzone said the heat was set to move across the country as the week went on, with Melbourne set to see temperatures top 30 degrees toward the weekend, while Perth cooled down into the 20s.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.