Tag Archives: oceania

Two of South Australia’s most senior cabinet ministers resign

Two of South Australia's most senior cabinet ministers, Deputy Premier Susan Close and Treasurer Stephen Mullighan, will quit politics at next year's state election in March.

Premier Peter Malinauskas was visibly emotional when he announced the pair will not be contesting their seats at a sudden press conference this afternoon.

He said he was taken aback when he was approached by the ministers separately a few weeks ago and tried his best to convince them not to leave, but they both shared personal reasons for their departures.

READ MORE: Number of full-time workers drops ahead of next rates call

Two of South Australia's most senior cabinet ministers, Deputy Premier Susan Close and Treasurer Stephen Mullighan, will quit politics at next year's state election in March.

"'I'm here today to make it very clear that my persuasive powers failed, and they have both announced their resignation to our cabinet earlier today," Malinauskas told the media.

"I'm really sad by this. I've known Susan and Stephen for a long time, and they're good friends of mine, and they've been incredible support to me in different ways over the last few years, and I'm really sad to see them go."

Malinauskas paid special tribute to them both and said he would miss them in their roles.

"It's really tough, and all of the service and loyalty they provided to the party and to the government and to me personally, demands nothing but gratitude from me for everything they have done, and nothing but the absolute best wishes for their journeys into the future outside of the political realm," he said.

"In my capacity, I feel I can safely say on behalf of everyone in the cabinet and the caucus and the party, I'm going to miss them."

READ MORE: ABC denied spot at Trump's UK press conference

Two of South Australia's most senior cabinet ministers, Deputy Premier Susan Close and Treasurer Stephen Mullighan, will quit politics at next year's state election in March.

Close, who was first elected in 2012 to the seat of Port Adelaide, said she had run out of energy to serve in her roles as deputy premier and minister for climate, environment and water, industry, innovation and science and workforce and population strategy.

"Life is really short. I have been watching my mother disappear into dementia over the last four years, and it was for me an alarm bell reminding me that life is finite and it's precious and it is way shorter than you think when you're young," she said.

"I want to do something else, I want to have some freedom, and I feel that I've given what I can give to public life."

Close denied her resignation was due to the state's ongoing algal bloom, saying she feared people may believe that's the reason. 

"Ironically, it made me hesitate because I was concerned that people might think that there was a connection between the two and that I was somehow fleeing the algal bloom, which is not the case at all," she said.

READ MORE: Why $30 billion sale of Australian company fell through

Two of South Australia's most senior cabinet ministers, Deputy Premier Susan Close and Treasurer Stephen Mullighan, will quit politics at next year's state election in March.

Mullighan was elected to the seat of Lee in 2014 and also acts as minister for police and defence and space industries.

The treasurer said that while he had been "tremendously lucky" to have been granted opportunities in politics, the job was "extremely demanding".

"It's not necessarily just us that's required to make that sacrifice or to commit that dedication, it's our families and it's our loved ones," he said.

"I didn't feel I had another four years of committing this much time and effort to these roles, to the exclusion of the time that I can show at home, as a husband and as a father."

Mullighan added that he had lost both his parents and his wife had lost her father.

"It takes a village to raise children, and our village is a little bit smaller than most, so I want to make sure the kids are still young, and I'm relatively young that I can I can be around more and be more present," he said.

Close and Mulligan will be replaced by new ministers in the coming days, but will remain in their seats until the state election in March. 

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Trump’s historic feud with Kimmel spans almost 10 years and two presidencies

In late 2015, Donald Trump appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live! for the first time.

He'd just been announced as the frontrunner for the Republican nomination and sat comfortably on an armchair opposite Kimmel, while the pair gabbed like old friends.

Ten years, one more Kimmel appearance and two Trump administrations later, the US president is seemingly hell-bent on getting the long-running late-night show cancelled for good.

READ MORE: Jimmy Kimmel yanked off air over Charlie Kirk comments

This photo provided by ABC shows guest Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump, left, with host Jimmy Kimmel, on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” on Wednesday, Dec. 16, 2015, in Los Angeles. The ABC show airs every weeknight, 11:35 p.m. - 12:41 a.m., ET. (Randy Holmes/ABC via AP)

Trump celebrated Kimmel being pulled off air over a controversial comment about Charlie Kirk's assassination in a scathing post on Truth Social, describing his former talkshow chum as having "zero talent" with "worse ratings" than Stephen Colbert, whose own show was recently cancelled.

They were once friends – or at least amicable entertainment industry colleagues.

So, where did it all go wrong for Kimmel and Trump?

READ MORE: Trump fixated on 'so healthy, so beautiful' host

Kimmel's early criticism of Trump over healthcare bill

Their now-public feud subtly began in 2017 after Trump secured the presidency in a race against Hillary Clinton the previous November.

Kimmel had already moved towards light political satire and spent a great deal of his opening monologues poking fun at Trump.

This time, it was personal.

He spoke on-air about Trump and the Republican Party's bid to overhaul the Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare.

An emotional Kimmel told viewers his own son was born with a rare heart defect.

He tearfully said that, before Obamacare, people like his child may not have been able to have health insurance due to it being labelled a "pre-existing" condition.

In this April 11, 2017 photo, host Jimmy Kimmel appears during a taping of "Jimmy Kimmel Live," in Los Angeles. Kimmel says his newborn son is home and doing great after open-heart surgery. A tearful Kimmel turned his show's monologue Monday, May 1, into an emotional recounting of the crisis with what Kimmel called a "happy ending."  (Randy Holmes/ABC via AP)

Later that year, he accused Trump on his show of being willing to "sign anything if it meant getting rid of Obamacare", referring to the Graham–Cassidy health care amendment.

"For Donald Trump, this isn't about the Graham-Cassidy bill. It's about getting rid of Obamacare, which he hates, primarily because Obama's name is on it," Kimmel said.

"At this point, he would sign anything if it meant getting rid of Obamacare.

"He'd sign copies of the Koran at the Barnes and Noble in Fallujah, if it meant he could get rid of Obamacare."

He also claimed Trump "doesn't know anything" about the bill.

When he faced criticism for straying outside of comedy with political commentary, Kimmel fired back once again on-air.

"I feel like it's my duty to remind these people who are so concerned about my qualifications: the guy you voted for president – his job qualification was this: he fired Meatloaf. And you put him in the White House," he said.

READ MORE: The Epstein files question the FBI Director refused to answer nine times

Emotional plea to Trump for action on gun violence

Kimmel has been vocal in his criticism over America's gun laws.

In 2018, he took aim at the president for his response after 17 were killed at a mass shooting in South Florida.

"Children are being murdered," Kimmel said.

"Do something. We still haven't even talked about it, you still haven't done anything about it."

He also pointed out that Trump nullified an Obama-backed rule which added people with mental illnesses to a national background check database for gun purchases.

READ MORE: Sheriff reveals why Charlie Kirk suspect turned himself in

President Donald Trump says he plans to sue the New York Times for $US15 billion.

Trump blasts Kimmel's show as 'fake news'

Trump was an early adopter of so-called "fake news" media critique and used this term to describe Kimmel's late-night show in 2020.

Kimmel claimed on his show that then-Vice President Mike Pence delivered fake boxes of PPE during the pandemic in 2020.

Trump took to his former platform of choice Twitter, now X, and said: "More Fake News, this time from Jimmy Kimmel's last place show!"

That same year, Trump called the host a "wacko 'last placer'" in a post congratulating TV presenter Greg Gutfield on his ratings.

Trump administration tries to intervene

Rolling Stone reported in 2023 that members of the Trump administration once complained to Disney, the parent company of ABC which airs Jimmy Kimmel Live!, over the constant Trump barbs.

The publication claimed the White House pressured Disney to censor Kimmel's monologues which included any anti-Trump sentiment.

READ MORE: Trump names his next target after Jimmy Kimmel pulled off air

HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA - MARCH 10: Host Jimmy Kimmel speaks onstage during the 96th Annual Academy Awards at Dolby Theatre on March 10, 2024 in Hollywood, California. (Photo by Kevin Winter/Getty Images)

An Oscars rant

Kimmel was the host of the Oscars in 2024 and used the stage to openly mock Trump's real-time online criticism of him.

Between his monologue and returning to the stage, Trump penned a fiery message on Truth Social where he slammed Kimmel's performance.

"Has there EVER been a WORSE HOST than Jimmy Kimmel at The Oscars. His opening was that of a less than average person trying too hard to be something which he is not, and never can be. Get rid of Kimmel and perhaps replace him with another washed up, but cheap, ABC 'talent,' George Slopanopoulos," Trump wrote.

"He would make everybody on stage look bigger, stronger, and more glamorous."

Kimmel used his sharp wit to hit back on-stage.

"Blah, blah, blah… OK, now, see if you can guess which former president just posted that on TruthSocial. Anyone? No?" he said.

"Well, thank you, President Trump. Thank you for watching, I'm surprised you're still – isn't it past your jail time?"

In response, Trump tried to hit Kimmel where it hurts: his ratings.

"His ratings are terrible, he's not a talented guy," Trump told Fox News shortly after.

"I hear he hits me all the time, so I figured I'd hit him, because I thought he was a lousy host."

READ MORE: King Charles backs AUKUS submarine deal in hint for Trump

Jimmy Kimmel reveals he is now a grandfather during his opening monologue

Feud reignites after 2024 election

When Trump clinched the 2024 presidential election against Kamala Harris, Kimmel returned to air with a piercing criticism of the re-elected president.

He was visibly emotional as he addressed viewers in the aftermath of the election.

"Let's be honest. It was a terrible night last night," he said.

"It was a terrible night for women, for children, for the hundreds of thousands of hard-working immigrants who make this country go, for health care, for our climate, for science, for journalism, for justice, for free speech.

"It was a terrible night for poor people, for the middle class, for seniors who rely on Social Security, for our allies in Ukraine, for NATO, for the truth and democracy and decency."

Final straw for Trump

Kimmel and Trump's historic fallout reached new heights when Kimmel's show was pulled off the air.

The host accused the MAGA movement of scoring political points off the death of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, a comment which prompted Disney's ABC to suspend the show.

"Jimmy Kimmel Live will be pre-empted indefinitely," an ABC spokesperson told CNN, declining to share any further details.

Trump was fast to respond with celebratory post on Truth Social.

"Great News for America: The ratings challenged Jimmy Kimmel Show is CANCELLED," Trump wrote.

"Congratulations to ABC for finally having the courage to do what had to be done. Kimmel has ZERO talent, and worse ratings than even Colbert, if that's possible. That leaves Jimmy and Seth, two total losers, on Fake News NBC. Their ratings are also horrible. Do it NBC!!! President DJT."

Kimmel is yet to respond, however is said to be "livid" over the decision, according to US media reports.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Brittany Higgins lodges appeal over costly defamation loss to former boss

Brittany Higgins is appealing elements of her costly defamation battle loss to her former boss, adding another chapter to the bitter legal saga.

Linda Reynolds sued Higgins over a series of social media posts the ex-Liberal senator believed damaged her reputation.

The Western Australian Supreme Court in August found the posts were defamatory and awarded damages of $315,000 plus $26,109 interest to Reynolds.

READ MORE: Trump fixated on 'so healthy, so beautiful' host

Brittany Higgins is appealing elements of her costly defamation battle loss to her former boss.

Higgins was also ordered to pay 80 per cent of Reynolds' legal costs, which are yet to be determined, in a judgment published last week.

The former political staffer is appealing the damages award and the costs order, according to documents filed in the WA Court of Appeal yesterday.

She's also seeking to challenge the finding that she breached a 2021 deed of settlement between the pair with an Instagram post referring to her being a defamation victim.

READ MORE: Jimmy Kimmel yanked off air over Charlie Kirk comments

Linda Reynolds sued Higgins over a series of social media posts the ex-Liberal senator believed damaged her reputation.

Higgins previously apologised to Reynolds after the former defence minister emerged victorious from the duo's high-profile five-week defamation trial, which ended in September 2024.

Justice Paul Tottle found Higgins' social media posts carried an array of imputations.

They included Reynolds engaged in a campaign of harassment against Higgins, mishandled her rape allegation and engaged in questionable conduct during Bruce Lehrmann's aborted criminal trial for rape.

Justice Tottle's 360-page judgment made factual findings about the events involving Reynolds and Higgins, including her alleged 2019 rape and the events in the years after it.

Higgins made 26 false or misleading statements in media interviews after her alleged sexual assault, it said.

She alleges former co-worker Lehrmann raped her in the senator's ministerial suite.

A Federal Court judge overseeing a defamation case launched by Lehrmann against Network Ten found Higgins was, on the balance of probabilities, raped by her former co-worker in the office.

Lehrmann is appealing that finding.

He has always denied the rape allegation and his criminal trial was derailed by juror misconduct.

Support is available by calling 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) or National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028.

Coroner finds missing radio host was killed by croc

A former radio host who went missing in Far North Queensland has been fondly remembered by his colleagues after a coroner found he had most likely been taken and killed by a crocodile.

Roman Butchaski was an avid fisherman and outdoorsman and formerly a host with Nine radio station 2GB, where he presented a fishing show.

The 76-year-old went missing during a fishing trip in the Olive River region of Queensland on November 12, 2023.

READ MORE: NRL star hit by media scrum before facing court

Roman Butchaskihttps://omny.fm/shows/ben-fordham-full-show/we-miss-him-coroner-rules-on-death-of-popular-2gb-radio-host/embed?style=cover

Butchaski was last seen at Bramwell station at around 8am, but all that was found of him were his ATV buggy and some possessions.

At the time, two large saltwater crocodiles were known to be in the vicinity of where Butchaski was last seen, and the coroner believes one of them was responsible for his death.

"The fact that no sign of the missing person was located during the extensive and thorough search leads me to suspect the MP has entered the water and has been consumed by a crocodile," coroner Christine Roney said in her findings published on July 30.

"It is highly probable given the fact that there are large crocodiles which inhabit that section of water.

"It is also highly probable given the type of fishing the missing person was doing which involved him getting close to the water's edge and traversing snags in the form of fallen trees and steep banks and flicking small lures as close to these snags as possible."

READ MORE: Why Ben and Jerry's co-founders split after nearly 50 years

Roman Butchaski, a former Sydney radio host who went missing in Queensland in 2023.

Despite an eight-day search by authorities, Butchaski could not be located.

Radio host Ben Fordham paid tribute to Butchaski today, saying he was glad closure could be offered to his friends and family.

"It's awful when something terrible happens to anyone, but when you don't know what happened, it's even worse," Fordham said on 2GB.

"So in many ways, we are relieved to know what happened to Butch.

"So to Butch's family who are listening, we're thinking of you guys, and we only hope that you feel the same way that we do that, even though it's not what we want to hear."

Michael Guest, who hosted The Outdoor and Fishing Show with Butchaski, said the coroner's finding was in line with what he suspected.

"It's not until it sort of touches you directly that you actually sort of feel this really strange sort of empty feeling where there's no closure," he told Fordham.

"So it's nice to get some closure through the words of the coroner.

"I agree totally with what she said and it's what I thought happened in the first place, early days."

Guest admitted Butchaski could be "gung ho" and the thrill of a catch sometimes meant risks were taken.

"I think as fishermen we get a bit complacent and especially when the fish are biting," he said.

"It's just one of those things, the hunting instinct, the instinct to catch that big fish sort of takes over and you tend to get a bit closer to the water than you should sometimes."

Butchaski's character was integral to the show's success, his old colleague Guest said.

"He represented the average Joe Blow fisherman so well and asked the right questions and created a really great banter."

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

‘Incredibly grateful’: Family’s message after murder charge laid over cold case

The family of allegedly murdered woman Susan Goodwin have reflected on the "difficult" 23 years they endured before her remains were found.

SA Police said yesterday they are very confident they found 39-year-old Susan's remains and have since charged a man with murder.

Susan disappeared in 2002 and, until yesterday, her body had never been found.

READ MORE: Sheriff reveals why Charlie Kirk suspect turned himself in

Susan Goodwin, who disappeared in 2002.

Major crime detectives discovered human remains while digging up a backyard in Port Lincoln in the state's Eyre Peninsula.

Police then arrested and charged a 64-year-old man from Port Lincoln with murder.

He is expected to appear in Port Lincoln Magistrates Court today.

Both of Susan's parents have died but police spoke to her partner and sister yesterday.

READ MORE: The Epstein files question the FBI Director refused to answer nine times

Susan Goodwin was last seen at her local Coles and Woolworths in July 2002.

Susan's family thanked police for their exhaustive search for her remains and said they now have the answers "we've been looking for after such a long time".

"We'd also like to give a heartfelt thank you to the people who have been on this journey with us over the years, both in friendship and through investigations – your ongoing support, care and pursuit of the truth have meant more than these few words can say," the family said in a statement.

READ MORE: Jimmy Kimmel yanked off air over Charlie Kirk comments

Major crime detectives started to dig at the property in Port Lincoln at 9am today, after the backyard was scanned with a ground-penetrating radar yesterday.

"You've helped carry us through some of the hardest moments and we are incredibly grateful for that.

"Now begins a very personal journey for us as we try to come to terms with what's happened; laying Sue to rest once this is over so that she can be at peace with family that has gone before her and finding some sense of peace and acceptance within ourselves."

The family asked for privacy following an "emotional and difficult time".

"We're dealing with a lot and we ask for privacy and space so that we can look after our mental health and support each other," the statement ended.

READ MORE: Trump fixated on 'so healthy, so beautiful' host

Police searching a home in Port Lincoln following Susan Goodwin's 2002 disappearance.

Susan was reported missing on Friday, July 18, 2002, from her home on Moonta Crescent at Port Lincoln.

She was last seen around lunchtime that day, after shopping at Coles and Woolworths in Port Lincoln.

Police previously offered a $200,000 reward for any information which led to a conviction or discovery of Susan's remains.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Chinese media labels Albanese government trade policy as ‘two-faced’

Chinese state media has labelled Australia's attempt at smoothing trade barriers between the countries as "two-faced" and accused the government of attempting to "butter bread on both sides" in a piercing editorial.

English-language newspaper China Daily published an opinion piece warning Canberra over simultaneously pursuing stronger trade relations with China while strengthening security ties with the United States.

"Australia should confront the stark contradiction between its economic interests and its security alignment, as the latter only escalates regional tensions and undermines stability," the editorial reads.

READ MORE: Trump fixated on 'so healthy, so beautiful' host

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese while meeting with representatives from Football Australia and the Socceroos, at Parliament House in Canberra on Thursday  4 September 2025. fedpol Photo: Alex Ellinghausen

READ MORE: Sheriff reveals why Charlie Kirk suspect turned himself in

"While benefiting from trade with China, Australia continues to try and sustain the AUKUS arrangement, a US-led mechanism targeting China, and lend support to the Philippines in the South China Sea.

"Such behaviour exposes Australia's implicit calculations to butter both sides of its bread at the same time."

The newspaper claimed China would "under no circumstances tolerate such infringements on its core interests".

"Its two-faced policy toward China is not sustainable in the long run," the article stated.

The editorial, which has no byline, plainly stated that China "poses no threat to Australia".

It then urged the government to develop a "rational perception" of China, which captures its key role as a major trading partner and one that promotes peace in the Asia-Pacific region.

The writer finished by claiming the Albanese government knows what to do to keep relations stable.

The blunt message from Chinese media comes as Australian government officials spend time in China in a bid to court local tourism and investment.

Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan is visiting four cities, including Beijing, to cement a warmer relationship with one of Victoria's key trading partners.

READ MORE: The Epstein files question the FBI Director refused to answer nine times

President Donald Trump reviews the Guard of Honour after the arrival at Windsor Castle in Windsor, England, Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2025.(AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth, Pool)

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also made a five-day visit to China in July, a seemingly successful trip which provoked a glowing editorial in Chinese newspaper Global Times.

The writer heaped praise on Albanese for having wisdom in "seeking harmony without uniformity" during his meeting with Chinese leaders.

The same publication previously heaped praise on Albanese for achieving a "turnaround" in Chinese-Australia relations.

The PM is also expected to meet with US President Donald Trump next week in New York as he heads to the UN General Assembly.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

‘Sad it’s come to this’: Why ice-cream icons split after nearly 50 years

Hours after Ben and Jerry's co-founder Jerry Greenfield resigned from the ice cream company he founded nearly five decades ago, his former business partner, Ben Cohen, revealed to CNN why Jerry felt he had to leave.

"Jerry has a really big heart, and this conflict with Unilever was really kind of tearing him apart. So he felt like he had no choice to resign," Cohen told CNN's Vanessa Yurkevich.

"Jerry's kind of sad that it's come to this, but part of him is feeling a sense of relief that he's no longer in this intense conflict."

READ MORE: Trump fixated on 'so healthy, so beautiful' host

Earlier Wednesday, Greenfield shared on social media that he was quitting the ice cream company, accusing parent company Unilever of curtailing Ben and Jerry's ability to speak out on social and political causes, which is synonymous with the brand's identity.

The conflict between the co-founders and Unilever has erupted into public view over the past several years, resulting in lawsuits and publicly posted letters.

British-based Unilever bought Ben and Jerry's ice cream for US$326 million ($490 million) in 2000 but allowed the company to operate independently and continue its social mission without interference from its new parent company.

READ MORE: Jimmy Kimmel yanked off air over Charlie Kirk comments

Cohen and Greenfield remained at the company, which they founded in 1978, but not in operational roles. Instead, they focused on the company's social missions.

But Cohen told CNN that as management at Unilever turned over, no one who signed the deal with Ben and Jerry's remains, and the conglomerate started to disrespect the terms of its unique arrangement with the ice cream maker. Tensions boiled over in recent years as Ben and Jerry's opted to pull its operations from Israel, a decision that was overruled by Unilever.

Since then, the company and its parent have feuded, mostly over politically focused social media posts that Cohen said Unilever opposed – and threatened to fire people over.

READ MORE: Sheriff reveals why Charlie Kirk suspect turned himself in

Speaking out on political issues, ranging from President Donald Trump to Israel and the Gaza Strip, angered Unilever, which fired the company's chief executive earlier this year.

Ultimately, Greenfield had enough. But Cohen said he chose to stay to continue to fight for the company's independence.

"I'm glad that we're both standing up for the values of Ben and Jerry's," Cohen told CNN.

"I think that I can be most helpful from the inside and and Jerry's going try to be helpful from the outside."

Despite Greenfield's exit, Cohen said he is committed to the independent board that helps control the brand and will work to convince its parent company to sell the brand to a group of investors committed to Ben and Jerry's social mission.

READ MORE: The Epstein files question the FBI Director refused to answer nine times

Tubs of Ben & Jerry's, manufactured by Unilever

Ben and Jerry's is currently being spun off from Unilever into a new company called The Magnum Ice Cream Company, which expects to be publicly traded in November.

The Magnum Ice Cream Company in a statement said it disagrees with Greenfield's and Cohen's perspective, and said it has tried to work with the brand's co-founders.

"We remain committed to Ben and Jerry's unique three-part mission – product, economic and social – and remain focused on carrying forward the legacy of peace, love, and ice cream of this iconic, much-loved brand," a Magnum spokesperson said in a statement.

Politics is profit

A major factor in Cohen's remaining at the company is to keep intact Ben & Jerry's three-part mission: a social mission to support justice and equality, along with a product and financial mission. He says all three are core to the brand – and claims it's good for business.

"When we came up with that three part mission, we deliberately wrote it horizontally to make the statement that they are all equally as important," he said.

"As the company acts on its social values and as it produces great ice cream, it ends up making a good profit."

Unilever, which doesn't break out Ben and Jerry's sales separately, said in its 2024 annual earnings report that its ice cream division rose 3.7 per cent from the year before.

Cohen doesn't regret maintaining its political and social stances, saying that Ben and Jerry's products have a small portion of the market so "we don't have to appeal to everybody."

"The reality is that businesses are incredibly political," he said.

"The average business, (are) using their money to influence elections, and they're using their money and their lobbyists to influence legislation."

He added: "The only difference is that Ben and Jerry's political aspects are overt, where we let people know what we think, whereas other businesses are covert."

Even with Greenfield leaving the company, the "spirit of Jerry will always be at Ben and Jerry's," Cohen said. And their friendship, which reaches back to junior high when they were the "two, slowest, fattest kids" in their class, will endure.

"I was a failure as a potter. Nobody would buy my pottery. Jerry was a med school reject, and we got together when we were 26 and said, 'Let's try starting a little business. Maybe that'll work.' We ended up starting this homemade ice cream shop in an old gas station in Burlington, Vermont, on an investment of US$8000 ($12,027) and we had no plans to be anything larger than that," Cohen said.

"It's been an amazing ride. It's been an amazing adventure, an amazing odyssey. There's been good times, there's been bad times, there's been challenging times, and we've been through them all together, Jerry and myself, and it's just built a stronger bond between us."

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

The Epstein files question the FBI Director refused to answer nine times

FBI Director Kash Patel this week became the first prominent Justice Department official to testify under oath since the Donald Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files blew up in its face.

While Epstein was an occasional subplot during Patel's testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, it was a huge focus of his appearance in front of the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

The hearing got very heated at times as Democrats decided to go with a scorched-earth approach and Patel responded in kind, leading to several shouting matches.

READ MORE: 'Priceless and eternal': Trump, Charles speak at lavish banquet

FBI Director Kash Patel speaks to Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., as Patel appears before the House Judiciary Committee, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2025.  (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

After one Democrat said that the courts had called "bullsh*t" on the administration's strategy to try and get grand jury testimony unsealed, Patel ultimately responded, "I'm going to borrow your terminology and call bullsh*t on your entire career in Congress because you've been a disgrace to the American people."

At another point, Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington pressed Patel repeatedly on whether he had ever met with Epstein's victims. The director again didn't answer directly, eventually saying, "Any insinuation by you or any people on your side that I am not manhunting child predators and sex traffickers, just look at the stats."

Here's what to know from Patel's testimony on Epstein:

Patel was repeatedly evasive on Trump

The director was repeatedly evasive when the subject turned to President Donald Trump's proximity to the files.

Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell of California asked Patel no fewer than nine times whether he had told Attorney General Pam Bondi that Trump's name appeared in the Epstein files. Each time Patel declined to directly answer the question.

He instead said there had been many conversations about the files and noted the administration has released some documents with Trump's name in them. He later criticised Swalwell for not focusing more on crime in his home state. But he never answered the question.

IN PICTURES: The moment of Donald Trump's UK visit cameras weren't allowed to see

President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, Sept. 15, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

The question of how Trump was informed he was in the files is a significant one. Trump initially falsely denied he was told he was in the files, but we later learned Bondi had told him in May that he was. It was around this time that the administration began downplaying what the files might reveal.

In another exchange, Democratic Representative Ted Lieu of California asked Patel whether Prince Andrew's and Trump's names were on an Epstein client list. The Department of Justice has said there is no client list, but instead of citing that denial, Patel instead responded that the FBI had already released an index of names.

Vouched for Trump on one key point

But Patel was willing to address Trump's proximity to Epstein in another way – in a way beneficial to the president.

When Lieu asked him if there were any "photos of Trump with girls of an uncertain age," Patel responded, "No."

But when pressed on how he knew that, Patel suggested it wasn't from his own review.

"Because that information would have been brought to light by multiple administrations and FBI investigators over the course of the last 20 years," Patel said.

Trump has likewise argued that if there was anything bad in the files that the Biden administration would have used it against him.

In fact, it's not normal for administrations or the FBI to release derogatory information about people who haven't been charged with crimes. As a counterpoint, Lieu noted that we only recently learned about the alleged birthday letter Trump wrote Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003.

READ MORE: Suspect in Charlie Kirk shooting appears in court

Committee Ranking Member Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., speaks as FBI Director Kash Patel appears before the House Judiciary Committee, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2025. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

Patel was cautious when asked about other Epstein trafficking victims

The big question most people have about Epstein is whether there is any evidence he trafficked girls or women to other men.

A few answers Patel gave on that subject are worth reflecting on.

He seemed to suggest it was possible Epstein had done so, but that he couldn't say so definitively because there was no credible evidence of it and/or because of the terms of a non-prosecution agreement Epstein reached with US attorney Alex Acosta in the late 2000s.

On Tuesday, he said there was "no credible information" Epstein had trafficked victims to other men.

But he caveated that by saying it was based on "the information that we have." He also made a point to cite how that non-prosecution agreement limited the investigation and what he was "able to speak to publicly."

On Wednesday, Patel was asked a similar question. He emphasised that he wasn't ruling out the possibility.

READ MORE: Woman's fatal fall in Queensland pub sparks investigation

"Let me make something crystal clear: I never said Jeffrey Epstein didn't traffic other people, other women, and there are not other victims," Patel said. "This is the investigation we were given from 2006, '07, and '08, and the search warrants from 2006, '07, and '08. That's what we're working with."

Later in the hearing, Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky noted that Epstein's victims have alleged Epstein trafficked victims to at least 20 men.

Ultimately, Patel suggested the information was deemed not credible enough by prosecutors and suggested he wouldn't share it.

"We are also not in the habit of releasing incredible information," Patel said. "That's not what we do, but multiple authorities have looked at the entirety of what we have."

Answers like these emphasise how difficult it could be to satisfy those who want full disclosure and suspect there's more that lies beneath the surface. And, of course, Patel was once among those who alleged a massive coverup.

Democrats are going big on this issue

One thing Wednesday's hearing made abundantly clear: Democrats intend to push this issue long and hard.

One of the dilemmas in these hearings is there are often many subjects lawmakers want to ask about, and you only get these top officials testifying every once in a while. Patel's much-criticised handling of the manhunt for Charlie Kirk's assassin last week could have been fodder, too.

But after Senate Democrats largely glossed over the Epstein issue on Tuesday, House Democrats focused on it intently. Virtually all of them asked about it, and they seemed to have a plan to touch on many different facets of the issue.

READ MORE: 'Pay attention': Passenger flight repeatedly warned to steer clear of Air Force One

Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., speaks with FBI Director Kash Patel as he appears before the House Judiciary Committee, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2025.  (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

Polling suggests Republican voters are more critical of the administration's handling of the Epstein files than any other issue, with large numbers of them believing the government is still hiding key information. And the House of Representatives is also a central battleground, given it's where Massie's threat of a discharge petition is forcing GOP leaders' and the administration's hand in turning over documents.

(That discharge petition could reach the crucial 218-vote threshold next week to force the release of the files, after a special election in Arizona that the Democrat is expected to win.)

Their focus on pressing Patel over and over again led to a number of tense scenes in which Patel responded by insulting the lawmakers. That might appeal to Trump, who likes his officials to be combative in their testimony. But there's a real question about whether that's what the American people want to see, especially given how skeptical they've been of the administration's handling of this subject.

A particularly flippant moment

And one moment stands out on that front. It came when Patel, rather remarkably, decided to commit to an investigation in real time.

Democratic Representative Jared Moskowitz of Florida noted that Trump has denied the legitimacy of the Epstein birthday letter signed in Trump's name. But the letter was turned over by Epstein's estate.

So Moskowitz asked if the FBI would investigate Epstein's estate for furnishing an allegedly "fake document with the president's signature" linking Trump to Epstein.

Moskowitz and many others are obviously skeptical of Trump's denials, given Trump's false claims about the birthday letter. So the idea was to demonstrate that even the FBI didn't take Trump's denials seriously.

Patel at first downplayed the idea, saying, "On what basis?"

Moskowitz repeated that Trump was basically claiming Epstein's estate released a fake document that made Trump look bad.

And quickly, Patel suddenly agreed to investigate.

"Sure, I'll do it," he said.

That Patel so quickly relented – however seriously he intends to actually investigate – spoke to how much pressure has been brought to bear.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Who landed the best seats at Trump’s UK state banquet

More than 150 guests attended the banquet in honour of US President Donald Trump's second state visit to the UK, from royals to billionaires.

Photos from the lavish event show a room dripping in gold and members of the British monarchy rubbing shoulders with key figures in the Trump administration.

But who landed the best seats in the house? Here's a breakdown of some of the biggest names on the guest list.

READ MORE: Trump fixated on 'so healthy, so beautiful' host

The king is sitting next to Trump at the center of the 50-meter long table in St. George's Hall, where the ceiling is adorned with the coat of arms of every Knight of the Garter since the order was founded in 1348. Catherine, the Princess of Wales, is seated to the president's right.
On the other side of the table, Queen Camilla is seated next to first lady Melania Trump and Treasury chief Scott Bessent. Media mogul Rupert Murdoch also has a seat at the table.

President Trump was sat in the centre of the 47m long banquet table, flanked by King Charles III and Catherine, the Princess of Wales.

Trump's nameplate reportedly read "President of the United States of America" in all capital letters.

In keeping with tradition, spouses were seated apart at the expansive table.

First Lady Melania Trump was in the chair across from the commander-in-chief.

Melania Trump with members of the British royal family at the State Banquet in Windsor Castle, England, on day one of U.S. President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump's second state visit to the UK, Wednesday Sept. 17, 2025.

On her left side was Camilla, Queen Consort, who sat opposite the Princess of Wales.

Prince William sat to Melania's right and across from his father.

Next to him was Paula Reynolds, who is chair of National Grid, a British multinational electricity and gas utility company.

READ MORE: Jimmy Kimmel yanked off air over Charlie Kirk comments

The Prince of Wales and Ms Paula Reynolds and the Princess of Wales with Michael Boulos, walk at the state banquet at Windsor Castle, Berkshire, on day one of US President Donald Trump's second state visit to the UK with his wife on September 17, 2025 in Windsor, England.

Other guests who nabbed seats near the centre of the table included US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

He was seated on the King's left hand side.

Lady Victoria Starmer, wife of British Prime Minister Kier Starmer, sat to the left of Rubio.

Her husband was seated elsewhere.

READ MORE: Sheriff reveals why Charlie Kirk suspect turned himself in

Marco Rubio and his wife at the State Banquet in Windsor Castle, England, on day one of U.S. President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump's second state visit to the UK, Wednesday Sept. 17, 2025. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer arrives to attend a State Banquet at Windsor Castle for the State visit by the President of the United States of America on September 17, 2025 in Windsor, England. President Trump is in England from Sept. 16-18 on his second UK state visit, with the previous one taking place in 2019 during his first presidential term.

Trump's son-in-law Michael Boulos was given a prime position on the Princess of Wales' right hand side.

Boulos is married to Tiffany Trump, the US President's fourth child and only child with second wife Marla Maples.

Tiffany was sitting a few seats away from her husband, next to Apple CEO Tim Cook.

Cook was one of many noteworthy tech guests, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who was seated further down the long banquet table.

Tiffany Trump, Tim Cook and more at the State Banquet in Windsor Castle, England, on day one of U.S. President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump's second state visit to the UK, Wednesday Sept. 17, 2025. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman (L) attends the State Banquet at Windsor Castle for the State visit by the President of the United States of America on September 17, 2025 in Windsor, England. President Trump is in England from Sept. 16-18 on his second UK state visit, with the previous one taking place in 2019 during his first presidential term.

Altman has a reported net worth of $US2.2 billion ($3.3 billion), while Cook's net worth is said to be around $US2.5 billion.

Another exceedingly wealthy attendee was media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who is believed to be worth more than $US23.7 billion.

Murdoch, 94, attended the banquet with his wife Elena Zhukova, 68, a retired Russian molecular biologist. She is the billionaire's fifth wife.

Rupert Murdoch arrives to attend the State Banquet at Windsor Castle during the State visit by the President of the United States of America on September 17, 2025 in Windsor, England. President Trump is in England from Sept. 16-18 on his second UK state visit, with the previous one taking place in 2019 during his first presidential term.

Murdoch's wealth was outdone by the chief executive of the Blackstone investment group Stephen Schwarzman, who is worth a reported $US54.3 billion.

Other important American guests included Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who was escorted in by Dame Katherine Grainger, and White House Special Envoy Steve Witkoff.

US Ambassador to the UK Warren Stephen also attended the banquet and was escorted inside by Anne, The Princess Royal.

READ MORE: The Epstein files question the FBI Director refused to answer nine times

Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent and White House Special Envoy Steve Witkoff attend the State visit by the President of the United States of America at Windsor Castle on September 17, 2025 in Windsor, England. President Trump is in England from Sept. 16-18 on his second UK state visit, with the previous one taking place in 2019 during his first presidential term. The Princess Royal walks with US Ambassador to the UK, Warren Stephen, followed by Vice Admiral Sir Tim Laurence and Dame Vivian Hunt, at the state banquet at Windsor Castle, Berkshire, on day one of US President Donald Trump's second state visit to the UK with his wife, First Lady Melania Trump on September 17, 2025 in Windsor, England.

Key British political guests included Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper and Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy.

A total of 160 guests attended the lavish banquet and dined on a menu of quail egg salad, chicken ballotine and vanilla ice cream bombe.

The drinks menu included a 1945 vintage port – a nod to Trump having been the 45th US president – and a more than 100 year old 1912 cognac.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.