Hardly a day goes by without a major new development in the Mar-a-Lago investigation, whether it's a document drop from the Justice Department, a stunning comment from former President Donald Trump, a fireworks-filled court hearing or a long-awaited ruling.
The Justice Department's criminal probe into potential mishandling of classified materials is ongoing. The damage assessment is underway by US intelligence agencies. And the political fallout is still being shaped, as the November midterms approach and the 2024 election looms.
Here's a breakdown of what's going on and where things are headed in the investigation.
READ MORE: Trump search inventory reveals new details from FBI seizure
What's in the classified documents?
The government has recovered at least 325 unique classified documents from Mar-a-Lago, according to court filings describing Trump's turnover of materials in January, the subpoenaed documents he returned to the Justice Department in June and the fruits of August's FBI search.
We've known that some of these files were at the very highest level of classification, including some in an "SAP" program that severely restricts who can access the information. But since this scandal burst into public view, the big mystery has been: What are these classified files about?
Details have been very hard to come by — after all, these are national security secrets. But on Tuesday, The Washington Post reported that one of the documents seized by the FBI during the August 8 search described "a foreign government's military defences, including its nuclear capabilities."
"That's the kind of strategic information that can do tremendous damage," CNN's chief law enforcement and intelligence analyst John Miller said Wednesday on "CNN Newsroom."
READ MORE: Trump undermines defence with admission about classified documents
Where do things stand right now?
On Monday, federal District Judge Aileen Cannon issued a landmark ruling, granting Trump's request to appoint a "special master" to independently review everything that the FBI carted away from Mar-a-Lago.
The immediate next steps look like this: The judge ordered Trump's lawyers to confer with the Justice Department and prepare a joint filing explaining their views on who should serve in the position, what their exact responsibilities should be, how they should be paid, how fast they should do their work and more. The deadline for this major court filing is Friday.
Meanwhile, the judge blocked the Justice Department from using any of the seized materials in connection with the ongoing criminal probe. That could slow down the investigation. The judge allowed the US intelligence community to finish its review of potential national security fallout.
Will the Justice Department appeal?
Cannon's ruling has been critiqued by a wide array of legal scholars, Trump critics, and even some former Trump allies, who described the decision as an unprecedented hamstringing of a major criminal investigation. (Cannon is a Trump appointee.)
Prosecutors have 30 days since the ruling dropped on Monday to file an appeal. The Justice Department has only publicly said so far that it's "examining the opinion" and mulling next steps.
Former Attorney General William Barr — a Trump loyalist during his tenure, who broke with Trump over the 2020 election and is now a Trump critic — says prosecutors should pursue an appeal.
READ MORE: US court shuts off Wi-Fi to block live Trump hearing reporting
"The opinion, I think, was wrong, and I think the government should appeal it," Barr said Tuesday in a Fox interview. "I don't think the appointment of a special master is going to hold up. But even if it does, I don't see it fundamentally changing the trajectory. I don't think it changes the ball game so much, as maybe we'll have a rain delay for a couple of innings."
There's a chance prosecutors will try to move full speed ahead on the special master process, while they simultaneously appeal the part of Cannon's ruling that blocked criminal investigators from doing anything with the fruits of their Mar-a-Lago search, like showing them to a grand jury.
What is the political fallout?
We're in uncharted territory, and the political fallout isn't clear yet. Both sides see an opening, but centrist voters seem to have sided against Trump as it relates to the Mar-a-Lago affair.
The Mar-a-Lago search has catapulted into Trump's top-of-mind. It's all over his social media pages, with multiple postings almost daily, filled with "deep state" conspiracy theories. At a rally last weekend in Pennsylvania in support of his handpicked candidates for Senate and governor, Trump devoted meaningful time during his speech to attacking the FBI and Justice Department.
READ MORE: Files in Trump's desk, storage clearly marked 'top secret': DOJ
On the other side, it's possible that the investigation could give a boost to Democrats, who have used the probe to attack Trump and raise the prospect of him possibly getting indicted or jailed.
Politically speaking, the reaction has been predictable. Polling indicates that most Republicans have Trump's back in the investigation, while most Democrats think he broke the law. So, it's more insightful to analyse how independent voters are assessing the fast-moving investigation.
A strong majority of independents, 59 per cent, said the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago to protect national security, compared to just 41 per cent who disagreed, according to a recent CBS News/YouGov poll. A Wall Street Journal poll found that only about one-third of independents believed that the FBI search was "just another example of the endless witch hunt and harassment" against Trump.
