Priya's parents wanted to prevent what happened to them from happening to any other family going through an unimaginable.

Priya was born prematurely at not even 25 weeks old in June 2024, and died just 42 days later.

Her grieving parents' situation was made worse when the company Priya's mum* had worked at for 11 years cancelled her three months of pre-approved paid parental leave.

READ MORE: Reddit in, Roblox out: Warning five weeks out from social media age ban

She was offered a month of personal leave while her husband, Chris Breen, was able to take his full parental leave entitlement. 

Sadly, what her company did was technically legal. 

What started as an online petition became legislation this week after Baby Priya's Bill passed federal parliament, preventing workplaces from cancelling paid parental leave if an employee experiences stillbirth or infant loss.

Priya's mum said she felt a vast range of emotions, from being relieved parliament had voted in support, to being sad because her advocacy had been a way to love and demonstrate her love to Priya.

"Her name is law," she told 9news.com.au.

"There were moments in my life where I felt her life was not validated by others, and to have her name as law and her light shine on forever is something I am so grateful for.

"She lived on earth for only 42 days, but her love, light, and essence will live on forever through Baby Priya's Bill."

READ MORE: COVID vaccines far safer for kids' health than infection, study finds

Priya's mum said a part of her knew her situation would "hit a nerve" with Australians, while Breen said the support they received had "overwhelmed" them. 

"It's not just about grieving parents, it's a woman's issue as well," Priya's mum said. 

More than 17 months on from Priya's death, the pair continue to make time to remember her every Sunday at the time she passed away.

"Priya has left a lasting impact on me. She is a part of me, and I may not be able to carry her in my arms, but I carry her in my heart and always will. She made me a mother, and for that I will forever be grateful to her," Priya's mum said.

"Memory is a strange thing, and sometimes the strongest memories of Priya come when I am not intentionally thinking about her at all," Breen said. 

Now that their fight is over, Priya's parents are looking forward to some much-needed rest.

"I started my advocacy work about eight months into her passing, and so now I am going to take this time to think of her, love her, grieve her, and just be," Priya's mum said.

"We are looking forward to the summer holidays, relaxing, spending time with family and doing the things we enjoy," Breen said. 

READ MORE: This common sight on Aussie kerbs could cop you a $500,000 fine

Priya's mum hurt by 'derogatory' comments

Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth welcomed the bill, saying it filled an "inconsistency" in the previous legislation.

"This is a good day for parents, and I hope not only gives people rights in this circumstance but brings out of the shadows a conversation about stillbirth and early death," she said at a press conference.

While the bill was largely supported by all sides of parliament, a small minority of the opposition, including Andrew Hastie, Barnaby Joyce, and Henry Pike, argued the law could be used by those who have had a late-term abortion.

Priya's mum said she was hurt by the "derogatory" comments.

"I am deeply disappointed by some over the past few days who have tried to turn Priya's Bill into something it is not," she said.

"Their words were hurtful, and it was shocking to see the discussion take such an absurd direction."

READ MORE: Why the upcoming cyclone season could be more severe than usual

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley today criticised the comments from members within the Coalition, labelling them as "insensitive".

"Losing a baby is one of the most difficult things that can ever happen to a mother and to a family. And as a mother and a grandmother, this is very personal," she told ABC.

Priya's mum said: "Politicians like this should not be in parliament."

*Priya's mum has asked not to be named. 

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

A senior federal bureaucrat who dismissed her own department's cybersecurity advice and ordered a trove of parliamentary emails be released to a private company previously hacked by Russian criminals says she believed the risk assessment was "overrated".

Jaala Hinchcliffe, the Parliamentary Services secretary, has conceded she should have sought advice from the clerk of the Senate before instructing her department to send hundreds of thousands – possibly millions – of emails and documents to a third party.

Hinchcliffe is now facing calls from the federal opposition for her conduct to be investigated.

READ MORE: Sensitive parliamentary documents handed to private company against risk advice

And she has been instructed by parliament's presiding officers to retrieve the data for safe storage in parliament.

As revealed by 9News, the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age last week, federal politicians are deeply concerned that their confidential communications may have been compromised.

Hinchcliffe was advised in September last year that giving a private contractor full administrator rights to the department's entire computer network posed an "extreme" risk of unlawful disclosure of sensitive information, including matters of national security.

There was particular concern among Department of Parliamentary Services (DPS) cybersecurity experts about handing the data to law firm HWL Ebsworth, given the company had been the victim of a massive cyberattack in April 2023 by a Russian-based ransomware group which stole 3.6TB of data.

She ordered the IT department to grant access anyway.

"I was of the view that the draft risk assessment that had been given to me had been overrated," Hinchcliffe told a parliamentary committee, saying the law firm had assured the department it had upgraded its security protocols.

READ MORE: The 4-word slogan that scares Aussie cyber experts

The released data was analysed by TransPerfect, which had been subcontracted by HWL Ebsworth to find information to support an investigation into potential wrongdoing by senior DPS colleagues, including former DPS Secretary Rob Stefanic.    

All up, 170GB of parliamentary data was released from Parliament's computer network under Hinchcliffe's orders. Based on the average size of a plain-text email, up to two million emails may be contained in the cache.

Hinchcliffe has been told by parliament's presiding officers, Senate President Sue Lines and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Milton Dick, to retrieve the emails from HWL Ebsworth.

Lines said she was "uncomfortable" about so much parliamentary data being held by a third party, especially when some of the material may be subject to special legal protection and immunity under so-called parliamentary privilege.

"To satisfy all of us who are parliamentarians, and a potential issue of privilege, the data is best held here," she told the Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee.

"It's of concern to me, so bringing it back here takes that concern away.

READ MORE: Corporate watchdog warns $200 billion Aussie industry to lift its game

"The speaker and I have been talking about this and we believe the data is best held in the parliament under the supervision of the clerks because that is what the parliamentarians expect."

The DPS data was taken out of parliament in three tranches – 299.7MB in June last year, 32.63GB in August last year and 136.95 GB in a "bulk extract process" over two days conducted by TransPerfect in late October/early November of last year.

Asked by Liberal senator James Paterson if she had sought advice on parliamentary privilege, Hinchcliffe said she had not, saying she had based her decision on "first principles" that MPs and senators' data would not be handed to an investigation being overseen by barrister Dr Fiona Roughley.

"But I concede, given the concerns raised in this committee, that it would have been beneficial for me to have sought advice from the (Senate) clerk which I did not do," Hinchcliffe said.

Paterson responded: "Did you really prefer your own judgment over the clerk's judgment about the risk of parliamentary privilege?"

READ MORE: Trump has failed his first electoral test of his second term, and he isn't on the ballot

She replied: "Senator, I've conceded that I didn't seek the advice of the clerks and that it would've been better placed if I had."

Liberal senator Jane Hume said she was deeply concerned that the Senate president was not informed of the data extraction until after it had occurred, despite IT's risk assessment.

"I would have thought that this would constitute further investigation as a potential breach of the department's code of conduct," Hume told the committee.

Lines said she would consider strengthening data handling protocols, "to make sure there is an oversight in place".

Asked by Hume if she retained confidence in Hinchcliffe, Lines said: "Yes I do."

Hume said she would formally request the Senate president seek advice from the Australian Public Service commissioner about whether Hinchcliffe had breached the department code of conduct.

Hume said she would also seek to hold an inquiry into potential breaches of parliamentary privilege.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

A Perth football club has been suspended from its league for two years after a player dressed up as late physicist Stephen Hawking viewing fake child abuse material.

The player was in a wheelchair with a mock-up of a communication system that had doctored images of a fake pornographic website on it as part of the Osborne Park Football Club's "Silly Sunday" end-of-season celebrations at Robinson Reserve in August.

Stirling Mayor Mark Irwin said council staff were "very distressed" to find the discarded costume during a routine inspection of the headquarters a couple of days later and reported the matter.

READ MORE: This common sight on Aussie kerbs could cop you a $500,000 fine

The Perth Football League has now announced that the club will be unable to compete for two seasons after ruling the incident a severe breach of its integrity standards.

"At a club-sanctioned event, offensive material was displayed depicting a doctored image of a child in a pornographic context," Perth Football League boss Andrew Dawe said.

"Senior club officials were present but failed to act.

"A two-year suspension reflects the severity of the breach, and gives the club time to rebuild governance capability, re-engage with the City of Stirling to see if they can find a home for the club and time to demonstrate considerable reform before the possibility of returning to the competition."

The suspension will begin in two weeks, but the club has that time to appeal the decision.

WA Police investigated the costume and found "no criminality".

The City of Stirling has, however, chosen to evict the club from its headquarters, arguing that it breached the behaviour clause in the lease agreement.

"Survivors of child abuse talking to us about the impact it has on them, I don't think any of them would find this a joke, or find it funny, or find that there is a level of this that is acceptable in our community," Irwin told reporters.

"I don't believe there is any way of explaining how this is okay."

READ MORE: 'Be proud': Council giving away free flags for Australia Day

Osborne Park Football Club president Jeremy LaBianca issued a statement in early October saying the player had only used photos of himself and nobody else in the fake material.

"It was an offensive and incredibly distasteful costume, I am in no way trying to dispute that or defend the decision," he said.

"The allegation of child pornography hits me really hard – as it does for many members of our community who are parents, own businesses and/or have public-facing roles."

LaBianca had earlier said he was "really embarrassed that we allowed this to happen and that we didn't intervene on the day".

9News understands that the player involved is also embarrassed by his behaviour and apologises for any distress caused.

He is also upset with the impact of his actions on the club. 

Support is available from the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Voters have dealt a stinging rebuke to Donald Trump today, even though the president wasn't on the ballot.

In elections for major offices across the country, Democrats have defeated Republicans.

Democrats have made the unpopular president the centrepiece of their campaign, and it has paid off.

READ MORE: Zohran Mamdani elected New York mayor

In Virginia, Democrat Abigail Spanberger won comfortably over Republican Winsome Earle-Sears – becoming that state's first female governor.

"Tonight, we sent message," Spanberger said in her victory speech.

"We sent a message to the whole world that in 2025 Virginia chose pragmatism over partisanship. We chose our Commonwealth over chaos."

Meanwhile in New Jersey, Democrat Mikie Sherrill beat Republican Jack Ciattarelli for the governor's mansion.

And despite Donald Trump's late endorsement of his opponent Andrew Cuomo, Zohran Mamdani has won comfortably in New York City.

The 34-year-old is the youngest mayor in the city for more than a century, and the first Muslim elected to the top job.

Turnout in the Big Apple was the highest it has been since 1969, with a surprisingly high number of young voters casting a ballot.

Exit polling has confounded expectations after the 2024 results showed Hispanic, black and younger male voters turning conservative.

Those demographic groups have swung hard towards the Democrats.

In the race for mayor of Cincinnati, Democrat Aftab Pureval has absolutely trounced JD Vance's half-brother Cory Bowman.

And while the race for Public Service Commissioner is hardly an event that draws voters to the polls in Georgia, the Democrats' comfortable win there will have Republicans anxious over what used to be one of their most reliable states.

READ MORE: Trump team's latest courtroom move 'whitewashes history'

Democrats haven't won an election for the role since 2006.

"Tonight's results are a repudiation of the Trump agenda," Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement. 

"The cruelty, chaos, and greed that define MAGA radicalism and are skyrocketing costs were firmly rejected by the American people."

The president meanwhile, responded to the results with an all-caps post on Truth Social.

"'TRUMP WASN'T ON THE BALLOT, AND SHUTDOWN, WERE THE TWO REASONS THAT REPUBLICANS LOST ELECTIONS TONIGHT,' according to Pollsters," Trump wrote.

Meanwhile in California, voters have taken the extraordinary step of overturning an independently drawn congressional map in favour of a gerrymander.

In response to the Texas legislature redrawing their districts to give Republicans five extra seats, California set out to do likewise.

But this required a referendum, which is on track to pass in a landslide.

READ MORE: New poll spells out Australians' falling out with Trump's US

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

A cloud is lingering over the family of a murdered bank teller as a man serving life behind bars challenges DNA evidence used in the notorious case.

Stephen Wayne "Shorty" Jamieson, 59, was convicted in 1990 and sentenced to life in prison for leading a gang of youths in the 1988 abduction, rape and murder of Janine Balding.

Long claiming he was the victim of mistaken identity and had been confused with another "Shorty", Jamieson has been fighting for further DNA testing he claims could clear his name, taking the matter to the NSW Supreme Court.

READ MORE: Choice reveals its Shonkys 'award' winners for 2025

The further inquiry had to come to a conclusion for the sake of Balding's family, the detectives that investigated the bank teller's murder and the community, Justice Ian Harrison said as the case returned to court today.

"The resolution of this issue, whatever it is, is important," the judge said.

"Once having been raised, there is … a cloud hanging over these matters."

READ MORE: Mum joked as six-year-old daughter died from neglect, court hears

The matter had to be dealt with following the law so some certainty could prevail, Justice Harrison said.

Jamieson watched silently by audio-visual link from Goulburn Prison as the judge spoke.

His barrister Richard Wilson SC said NSW Police had agreed to provide further information and conduct additional DNA testing.

That followed Justice Harrison ruling in February police could be asked to conduct testing on a certain area of a bandana used to gag Balding.

Jamieson contends this item of clothing could implicate a 63-year-old man who went by the same nickname: Mark "Shorty" Wayne Wells.

Wells' DNA profile had been obtained by NSW Police from Queensland authorities.

The 63-year-old has denied any involvement in the rape or murder and has never been charged over the crime.

The DNA testing would be expanded to include other areas of the bandana as well as other items connected with the crime, Wilson said.

The public defender noted there may not be conclusive results from the tests given the age of the incident and the fact Balding's body was found in a body of water.

The state government and police agreed the matter should be resolved soon.

But it was difficult to know exactly when the testing would be completed, the judge was told.

Balding's murder shocked the nation in its brutality after the bank teller was grabbed from a Sydney train station by the gang of homeless youths, who repeatedly raped her.

The 20-year-old was bound, gagged and thrown over a fence before being held underwater in a dam until she drowned.

The matter will return to court on December 17.

Support is available from the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

Lead guitarist of Australia-based New Zealand rock band Dragon, Robert Taylor, has died, his former bandmate has revealed.

Taylor was the lead guitarist for the band during arguably its most prominent period in the late 1970s, playing on hits like Are You Old Enough and April Sun in Cuba.

The band's drummer during much of that same period, Kerry Jacobson, took to social media to share the "unexpected and devastating news" of Taylor's death.

READ MORE: Choice reveals its Shonkys 'award' winners for 2025

Jacobson said the "irreplaceable" Taylor was his "mentor", "partner in crime", "musical comrade", and a "dear friend of decades".

"Many admired his songwriting and his musical talent and, after all these years people would still speak to me with great reverence of his talent and contribution to Australian music," he wrote.

"I admired his loyalty, I treasured his mateship, I valued his consistency and I absolutely loved it when often the phone would ring and he was up for a chat."

READ MORE: Mum joked as six-year-old daughter died from neglect, court hears

The New Zealand-born Taylor played with Dragon from 1974 to 1979, and then again from 1982 to 1985.

"He had a dry wit, was a keen observer and had a memory like a razor but mostly he was just one of the good ones," Jacobson said.

"That's what has stuck in my head today, 'he was one of the good ones' and I think that sums it up. I will miss him terribly."

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

Up to 20 per cent of Australian households are skipping meals or going days without eating, a new report has found.

One in five Aussie households admitted to missing meals, whilst 3.5 million said they had experienced food insecurity in the last year, according to Foodbank's Hunger Report for 2025.

The Australian Government defines food insecurity as anxiety or uncertainty about the quality or access to food, or where meals are missed or inadequate from a nutritional standpoint.

BREAKING NEWS: Three killed, multiple injured after cargo plane crashes in US airport

The concerning numbers are a small increase from last year, with renters and families feeling the pinch especially.

Almost half of all renters reported experiencing some sort of food insecurity, with 30 per cent saying they have had to skip meals.

The number of two-parent households with children struggling with food jumped to 39 per cent.

A staggering 68 per cent of single-parent households reported struggling for food.

Of these responders, 46 per cent said their food insecurity was severe.

Reasons for rising food insecurity include changes to living arrangements, natural disasters, and rising living expenses.

Aussies have also revealed the measures they are resorting to as cost-of-living pressures continue to bite.

READ MORE: One person is $20 million richer, they just don't know it yet

This includes cutting back on foods high in protein or on fresh produce, which has a significant impact on human health.

Nearly 30 per cent of people with severe food insecurity admitted they used buy now pay later apps or credit cards to pay for groceries, while 12 per cent said they have been forced to move to lower cost accommodation.

Experts say urgent action needs to be taken to fix a problem affecting millions of Aussies in the short-term and for years to come.

"For millions of Australians, the basics of life, food, shelter and security are still far from guaranteed in spite of what we hear about economic improvement," Foodbank chief executive and former politician Kylea Tink said.

"Greater investment in food relief, combined with action on the underlying causes of hunger including housing affordability, income inequality, and tax policy, is essential."

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

One local New South Wales council is offering residents a free Aussie flag to help celebrate on January 26 – and the mayor says he's "surprised" at the publicity it gets.

Late in October, Maitland Mayor Philip Penfold announced that submissions would open in November for residents to put their hand up for a free Australian flag, in the lead-up to Australia Day celebrations.

There are two options – one flag suitable for flying from a flagpole, and another flag with a bracket-and-pole kit that can be installed to hang off the side of a house.

READ MORE: Choice reveals its Shonkys 'award' winners for 2025

https://omny.fm/shows/ben-fordham-full-show/free-flags-local-council-restoring-pride-in-australia-day/embed

The flags are intended for display on private residences.

Penfold told 2GB's Ben Fordham it was the second year the council had put forward the offer, after it proved massively popular the first time around.

"We want Maitland residents to know they can be proud of their flag, of their country, and we're doing our little bit to promote that," he said.

READ MORE: Mum joked as six-year-old daughter died from neglect, court hears

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FCrPhilipPenfold%2Fposts%2Fpfbid02f3vSBnLpgT4E8jWoZzT3HExyvgok1Sarj3GG3bLJW1f45CShymawSxprqdPu5bHTl&show_text=true&width=500

"I wonder why we're a country now why we're a country now where it's controversial to promote flying your own flag."

He said he regretted that "unfortunately" the demand was expected to outstrip the $5000 to $10,000 budget allocated to the initiative, but that the council was determined to help people celebrate Australia Day.

"It's a small token gesture, but it means a lot to a lot of people," he said.

READ MORE: Former NRL star charged over alleged cryptocurrency fraud

January 26 marks the landing of the First Fleet at Sydney Cove, about a week after its arrival in Botany Bay.

It has often – though not always – been the day chosen to celebrate the British arrival in Australia, or Australian nationality and identity, and was first declared a public holiday in 1818, though differences existed between the colonies and later the states and territories.

It became an officially fixed national public holiday in 1994 but by then the date had been consistently marked in some way for decades.

There has been longstanding opposition to January 26 as Australia's national day, headed by Indigenous people and organisations who see it as "Invasion Day" and a day of mourning.

DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.

At least one person lost their licence after a council error that meant 172 drivers were wrongly issued speeding fines in central Wellington, New Zealand.

Last week reported that Wellington City Council admitted a lower speed limit on Aotea Quay could not be enforced because they had changed it incorrectly.

In 2023, the council introduced a temporary 50km/h limit on the busy arterial road between Sky Stadium and State Highway 1 while a roundabout was built. The permanent speed limit was 70kph.

After the roundabout was completed, in April 2024, the council installed 50km/h signs and consulted on lowering the speed limit permanently – a change it said was necessary due to the roundabout.

READ MORE: Meth-addicted mum joked as six-year-old daughter died, court hears

There was no opportunity for public feedback and the council approved the change in August 2024.

However, the council failed to submit the change to the National Speed Limit Register before the new Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits 2024 was signed by the minister of transport, returning many recently reduced limits to higher levels.

50km/h signs 'not legal'

Following last week's story, Stuff obtained emails between the council and police, released under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act.

The documents showed that in September 2024, the council's former chief of infrastructure, Siobhan Procter, emailed police to let them know about the speed limit change.

However, a month later, Gordon Keay from the Police Infringement Bureau replied, telling Procter the council had used the incorrect law to change the speed limit.

This meant the police had been enforcing a speed limit that was incorrect.

"The 50[km/h] signposted limit in place on Aotea Quay is not legal and as a result police have had to cancel and refund or withdraw from Ministry of Justice jurisdiction a total of 172 speeding infringements."

At least one of the infringements had resulted in disqualification over total demerit points, Keay wrote.

"Police have been enforcing that limit in good faith, but have now ceased any speed enforcement on Aotea Quay until the problem has been rectified.

"I recommend that the illegal and non-compliant 50[km/h] signs be removed or covered immediately and replaced with 70[km/h] signs which are compliant with the current legal speed limit for the area until this matter is resolved."

Inspector Peter McKennie, acting director of road policing, told Stuff that officers rely on the accuracy of speed limits set by local authorities.

If police find an inconsistency, they alert the controlling authority to fix it, as well as reviewing and cancelling any tickets issued in error.

For now, there are no speed limit signs posted along the several hundred metres of arterial route which takes traffic in and out of the city.

Wellington City Council referred Stuff to comments from the previous week's story, which said the public were getting a chance to comment on the speed change.

However, the consultation was going ahead for legal reasons and appeared unlikely to change the reality: without a lower speed limit, the roundabout would need to be rebuilt.

The consultation is open until early December, and the proposal will be decided by a council committee early next year.

This article was originally published on Stuff.co.nz and has been reproduced here with permission.

Plenty of Australians have tossed unwanted items on what they assume is a council clean-up pile, not realising they could be risking fines of up to half a million dollars.

Illegal dumping is an offence in every Australian state and territory, attracting on the spot fines of up to $15,000 and even higher court-imposed penalties.

The most common kind of illegal dumping is household waste and items left on the footpath or kerbside when there's no scheduled council collection.

READ MORE: Your guide to Australia's skies: The lunar eclipses, meteor showers and celestial events happening in 2025

Examples include leaving an old nightstand or mattress on the median strip, or dumping green waste that doesn't fit in your green bin in a local nature reserve.

As well as making the street look messy, illegal dumping can negatively impact human health, plants and animals, pollute waterways, and make public places unsafe.

The impacts can be even more severe if the waste being dumped is dangerous, or blocks emergency access.

Not to mention that it costs millions of dollars in hard-earned taxpayer cash to clean up every year.

So even if you've never dumped waste illegally, you may still be paying for it.

As for the Australians who have been guilty of illegal dumping – knowingly or otherwise – here are the state and territory fines you could be risking.

NSW

Under NSW legislation, it is an offence to deposit more than 50L or 50kg of litter or waste in or on a public place, an open private place, or a 'sensitive place'.

Sensitive places include but are not limited to national parts, beaches, and the grounds of childcare centres, hospitals and schools.

Fines for individuals are as follows:

• $1000 on the spot fine for small-scale illegal dumping on public land or open private places, $25,000 maximum penalty if convicted in court
• $2500 on the spot fine for small-scale illegal dumping in or on a sensitive place, $50,000 maximum penalty if convicted in court
• $15,000 on the spot fine for larger-scale waste dumping offences, $500,000 maximum penalty with an additional daily penalty of $120,000 for a continuing offence if convicted in court

If the waste contains asbestos the maximum penalty is double.

If an individual is found guilty of wilful or negligent disposal of waste causing actual or likely harm to the environment, they may face penalties of up to $2 million and seven years in prison.

ACT

Under ACT legislation, it is an offence to dump or store rubbish in a public place, including on a nature strip.

Penalties for individuals include:

• $1000 fine for basic littering
• $5000 fine and six months in prison for aggravated littering that could cause injury to a person, animal or public place
• $200,000 fine and seven years in prison for dumping of illegal substances
• up to $7500 fine for dumping of concrete in a public place or open private space without occupier consent

READ MORE: How to maximise public holidays and make the most of your annual leave in 2025

Victoria

Rubbish dumping on public land is illegal in Victoria, with maximum penalties of up to $800,000 and five years imprisonment for individuals.

Based on the Environment Protection Act 2017 and the current penalty unit of $203.51, penalties for individuals are as follows:

• $4070.20 (20 penalty units) for illegally dumping waste
• $12210.60 (60 penalty units) for illegally dumping waste that is dangerous
• $20,351 (100 penalty units) for illegally dumping more than 50 litres but less than 1000 litres of waste
• $48,842.40 (240 penalty units) for illegally dumping more than 1000 litres of waste

Queensland

Unlawfully leaving more than 200 litres (about the volume of a wheelie bin) of any type of waste in a public space counts as illegal dumping in Queensland.

Under current legislation, fines for individuals can exceed $160,000.

The current penalties for individuals caught illegally dumping waste are as follows:

• $333 for general littering, or up to $5007 if convicted in court
• $677 for dangerous littering, or up to $6676 if convicted in court
• $2670 for illegal dumping of less than 2500 litres of waste, or up to $66,670 if convicted in court
• $3338 for illegal dumping more than 2500L of waste, or up to $166,900 or twice the waste levy that was avoided if convicted in court
• $1669 for failing to comply with a compliance notice, or up to $50,070 if convicted in court

READ MORE: Breastfeeding in public: What are your legal rights in Australia?

South Australia

In South Australia, disposing of waste on public or private land without the appropriate licence, permit or approval counts as illegal dumping.

Penalties can be as high as $500,000 or four years imprisonment for individuals.

The current penalties for individuals include:

• up to $60,000 if convicted in court of knowingly allowing waste to be dumped on your property without an appropriate licence
• up to $120,000 and two years imprisonment if convicted in court of disposing of waste illegally
• up to $500,000 or four years imprisonment, or both, if convicted in court of dumping waste that causes serious environmental harm

Western Australia

Illegal dumping is an offence in WA and can attract maximum penalties of up to $62,500 for individuals.

The current penalties for individuals include:

• $500 for minor illegal dumping
• $2000 if convicted in court
• $62,500 maximum court penalty for more severe offences

READ MORE: A court ruling has changed the way police conduct strip-searches in NSW. Here is what you need to know

Northern Territory

Illegal dumping is an environmental crime in the NT, punishable by hefty fines if convicted in court.

The current penalties for individuals include:

• $1890 infringement notice for causing an environmental nuisance
• $14,553 if convicted in court

Tasmania

Under Tasmanian legislation, fines for illegal dumping must not exceed 50 penalty units.

Based on the current $205 value of one penalty unit, the total fine for an individual could be up to $10,250.

Have you got a story? Contact reporter Maddison Leach at Google Play.